Trk: What does it mean "16MP Four Thirds sensor starting to look a bit dated"? It will have always the same physical size, only technology can change but I do not believe that it will mean significantly better quality. More megapixels? I do not need them with micro 4/3.
Perhaps you are not micro4/3 shooter, but there is whole generation of 12MP sensors and later 16MP sensors, which are used in a few generations of cameras. (Oly and Pany)So they ment "16MP sensor, which was used many time before".I think this is one of the major complaints with LX100.
David V: Honestly, these were disappointing samples, IMO. I think Sony is making the most impressive bodies out there, but their lenses do little to exploit that goodness.
I have been itching to pull the trigger on an A7II to add a FF mirrorless camera to my lineup but I think I will stick with just my Fuji X-System cameras/lenses for now.
I am interested to see what Sony does to follow up to the RX1R, which is a fantastic camera.
I am always abit suspicious when I see some fierce criticism to one product when the person mentions in the next sentence a competitors product... ;)
@Stephen Scharf- Ok, but you agree that images posted should not be much different from the few years old model, right?
No sony FE 55/1.8= no vote
There are many excellent camera accessories made every month, but I can't understand why Richard Franiec is DPReview protégé with an DPR announcement almost every-time he makes a new grip.
People know about his products, it's great stuff, but why this publicity?
Thank you for nice hands-on experience with a camera that is outdated by better cameras and NOT on the top5 list of enthusiast's compacts (as of end of 2014).This camera is a big flop for Canon TBH.
What has changed? Why are you more serious now than in previous years?
We’ve actually been serious about it since the very beginning.
radissimo: I know that Photokina is every two years, but introducing few lenses you can by IN A YEAR seems...I don't know... sad and lame at the same time ...
this was not a criticism of Dpreview at all, more criticism of companies who are showing us a product, make us drooling and then tell us that we can buy a product in 1+ year later....
I know that Photokina is every two years, but introducing few lenses you can by IN A YEAR seems...I don't know... sad and lame at the same time ...
ouch!,at $2,290 is higher than I thought... :(
kadardr: They have to make damned sure that this is at least as good as the Sigma 1.4/50 Art lens. Otherwise there is no point.
I think SIGMA is larger and heavier, beeing AF, for MF this one is surely better
Juraj Lacko: It would be so much more appealing to me if it was made in m42 mount since that is easy to adapt with cheap adapter almost to any system.
Ahoj Juraj,for me peronally it's not such a big deal. I won't be interested in E-mount version for my A7, instead opting for (likely becoming cheaper) conon EOS version, putting it on helicoid EOS adapter to increase MFD
Aroart: My fuji x20 got me laid more than my sony rx100 or canon 70 d...nuff said...
I always suspected that SIZE MATTERS when you want to get laid
photo perzon: Its about IQ
Thanks for you input. I will bookmark your comment so I can return to it as many times as possible in the future.
non-clicky wheel=silver award ;)
Q-ute camera ,but that's all...
I am not expecting anything BIG from Canon anymore...
One step BEHIND: Nikon 1 V3 Review
How I see it:
HIGH: in sharpness&detail, LOW: in color&contrast , DR could be better
I like it though!
p.s. not for the price
bluevellet: FZ1000 is much more bang for the buck.
in Uk the price is almost THE SAME £774 RX10 (UKdigital -£50off) vs £749 FZ1000
sony is eligible for £50cashback
I would then go with sony- for weathersealing, size, aperture ring, sharper lens, AF, bulid quality, top display