radissimo

radissimo

Lives in United Kingdom Glasgow, United Kingdom
Joined on May 14, 2010

Comments

Total: 102, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Shooting with the Canon PowerShot G3 X article (278 comments in total)

So by the time Canon will be able to incorporate EVF into the body, Sony will be announcing RX10 mark IV...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 27, 2015 at 21:02 UTC as 46th comment
On The big beast: hands on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 article (1229 comments in total)
In reply to:

raydream: somehow I wished for a
1) Olympus interface
2) Panasonic 4k video
3) GX8 body style
4) Olympus EM style folding LCD
5) Olympus 5 axis IBIS

it already has GX8 body style

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2015 at 13:43 UTC
In reply to:

drivecancel: I bought a Fujifilm X100 used and upgraded it to FW 2.0 instead of buying an RX100, looking at the studio tests I made the right choice! (had to use X100S results)

You should not compare the cameras just based on the fact that both have one X and number 100 in their names

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2015 at 10:18 UTC
In reply to:

DVT80111: is it just me? I did not see a huge different in IQ from RX100.

the strenghts lie somewhere else

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2015 at 10:17 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1073 comments in total)

I bet my bum that this camera will be reviewed at 90- 92% (clear Gold Award sprinkled with a Platinum dust)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 21:15 UTC as 78th comment | 5 replies

Nice video, even shooting mostly with sony, I like G7 x better than Rx100 series for various reasons, but main ones are: color and touchscreen. Very nice camera indeed.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2015 at 21:00 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

radissimo: I bet that if they would make Q just with the M mount, it would sell EVEN BETTER that with this, althought likely great lens...

That's right, but this body with a M-mount is what a majority of people would prefer and buy.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 09:47 UTC
In reply to:

jiijiiviivii: Why would any NORMAL person pay that much money for this?

I like LEICA company.
They just make 90% people happy realising how much cheaper and capable cameras they own
10% will start to doubt

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 21:48 UTC
In reply to:

carphil: As far as I'm concerned, it's not a camera if it doesn't have a somewhat accurate optical viewfinder, Leica or not. The human eye is a much better judge of what is being seen than a computer chip. Why would I want a close video approximation of reality when I have it right in front of me. Over ninety nine percent of todays cameras are merely computerized image recorders with too many buttons and controls. I'll take ANY Leica rangefinder (with all their faults) over any of todays over-computerized offerings. If overpaying is the price I have to pay, then so be it. Furthermore, who cares what the camera sounds or looks like, it's the image that counts.

I would suggest to put film just behind the eyeball then

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 21:06 UTC
In reply to:

rds: Leicas, sadly, have become bling, status symbols, Christmas gifts Mick Jagger gives his posse. *** You won't become Cartier-Bresson by getting a Leica, and photography is not and never has been about the tool. It's about being there and seeing. If C-B were around today he'd use an iPhone or a GoPro.

Last night H-C-B told me in my dream, that he would not use Leica Q (he knew about the announcement suprisingly!) and he would use Fuji X-E2 with primes.
I wanted to ask why not digital Leica, but he dissapeared :(

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 21:03 UTC

I bet that if they would make Q just with the M mount, it would sell EVEN BETTER that with this, althought likely great lens...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 20:42 UTC as 79th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

RichRMA: I don't know. In one sentence, you attack the T for having a finger-print magnet for an LCD, in another, you talk about using the Q's touch screen. Is the Q screen somehow immune to prints or is it better because it's a smaller target (unlikely to smudge it just by holding the camera?).

The difference is that you don't have to use it at all on Q=no smudges

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 20:37 UTC
On Leica Q First Impressions Review preview (564 comments in total)

Is it good camera? -Seems so
Do I need it? No
Would it improve my photography? Possibly
Will I buy it? Hmm, [checking the bank accout with a false hope]

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 14:23 UTC as 171st comment
On Fujifilm X100T Review preview (671 comments in total)

RE: SILVER award

I think for DPR team having higher expectations of recent cameras is only good for them and the readers.
We are tired of all GOLD awards and I think the award is starting to make more sense (e.g in this case silver award for incremental step).

Keep a great work!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2015 at 12:02 UTC as 117th comment
On A Compact PEN: Olympus Stylus SH-2 Hands-on article (150 comments in total)

So Software update only... :(

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 09:13 UTC as 37th comment

the key question is:
ZA Distagon or ZM Distagon 35/1.4?

-my prediction is:
ZA: sharper in corners and less CA, BIG
ZM: smaller, more character or "mojo" :) in OOF areas, still plenty sharp (I own one and is superb on A7 and A7s), if price of ZA falls I am eager to compare.
Any thoughts?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 09:51 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
On CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview article (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

Karl Summers: Was hoping he would be asked point blank, "When is the 85mm Art coming out"?

@Barney
just.....when

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 00:31 UTC
In reply to:

Tommygun45: So will the 90 be the best native AF portrait lens for the E mount system or will the 55 still hold that crown?

55 will be MUCH better @f1.8

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 13:44 UTC

Too little,too late.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 09:41 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Review preview (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

Trk: What does it mean "16MP Four Thirds sensor starting to look a bit dated"? It will have always the same physical size, only technology can change but I do not believe that it will mean significantly better quality. More megapixels? I do not need them with micro 4/3.

Perhaps you are not micro4/3 shooter, but there is whole generation of 12MP sensors and later 16MP sensors, which are used in a few generations of cameras. (Oly and Pany)
So they ment "16MP sensor, which was used many time before".
I think this is one of the major complaints with LX100.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2015 at 20:07 UTC
Total: 102, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »