radissimo

radissimo

Lives in United Kingdom Glasgow, United Kingdom
Joined on May 14, 2010

Comments

Total: 80, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Have your say: Best Lens of 2014 article (103 comments in total)

No sony FE 55/1.8= no vote

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2014 at 19:52 UTC as 54th comment | 3 replies
On Richard Franiec offers Canon PowerShot G7 X custom grip article (110 comments in total)

There are many excellent camera accessories made every month, but I can't understand why Richard Franiec is DPReview protégé with an DPR announcement almost every-time he makes a new grip.

People know about his products, it's great stuff, but why this publicity?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2014 at 11:59 UTC as 9th comment | 3 replies

Thank you for nice hands-on experience with a camera that is outdated by better cameras and NOT on the top5 list of enthusiast's compacts (as of end of 2014).
This camera is a big flop for Canon TBH.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2014 at 13:21 UTC as 49th comment

What has changed? Why are you more serious now than in previous years?

We’ve actually been serious about it since the very beginning.

LOL

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 19:13 UTC as 130th comment
In reply to:

radissimo: I know that Photokina is every two years, but introducing few lenses you can by IN A YEAR seems...I don't know... sad and lame at the same time ...

this was not a criticism of Dpreview at all, more criticism of companies who are showing us a product, make us drooling and then tell us that we can buy a product in 1+ year later....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 21:36 UTC

I know that Photokina is every two years, but introducing few lenses you can by IN A YEAR seems...I don't know... sad and lame at the same time ...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 11:42 UTC as 26th comment | 7 replies
On Zeiss introduces Distagon T* 35mm F1.4 ZM lens article (58 comments in total)

ouch!,at $2,290 is higher than I thought... :(

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 13:40 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

kadardr: They have to make damned sure that this is at least as good as the Sigma 1.4/50 Art lens. Otherwise there is no point.

I think SIGMA is larger and heavier, beeing AF, for MF this one is surely better

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 12:25 UTC
In reply to:

Juraj Lacko: It would be so much more appealing to me if it was made in m42 mount since that is easy to adapt with cheap adapter almost to any system.

Ahoj Juraj,
for me peronally it's not such a big deal.
I won't be interested in E-mount version for my A7, instead opting for (likely becoming cheaper) conon EOS version, putting it on helicoid EOS adapter to increase MFD

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 12:24 UTC
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (310 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: My fuji x20 got me laid more than my sony rx100 or canon 70 d...nuff said...

I always suspected that SIZE MATTERS when you want to get laid

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 11:40 UTC
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (310 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo perzon: Its about IQ

Thanks for you input. I will bookmark your comment so I can return to it as many times as possible in the future.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 11:37 UTC
On Fujifilm X30 First Impressions Review preview (453 comments in total)

non-clicky wheel=silver award ;)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 21:32 UTC as 68th comment
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (362 comments in total)

Q-ute camera ,but that's all...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 23:19 UTC as 23rd comment

I am not expecting anything BIG from Canon anymore...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2014 at 18:09 UTC as 75th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)

One step BEHIND: Nikon 1 V3 Review

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 09:32 UTC as 107th comment
On Leica T Typ 701 real-world samples gallery updated article (104 comments in total)

How I see it:

HIGH: in sharpness&detail,
LOW: in color&contrast ,
DR could be better

I like it though!

p.s. not for the price

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2014 at 10:19 UTC as 24th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

bluevellet: FZ1000 is much more bang for the buck.

in Uk the price is almost THE SAME £774 RX10 (UKdigital -£50off) vs £749 FZ1000

sony is eligible for £50cashback

I would then go with sony- for weathersealing, size, aperture ring, sharper lens, AF, bulid quality, top display

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2014 at 12:32 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greynerd: It seems to me that the RX10 sits in a sort of no man's land between the Canon G1X MkII which has 80mm less reach but a large rather than mid size sensor yet is substantially smaller and the FZ1000 which has the reach to justify its size.

is the reach or aperture more important? it depends on use

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2970 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Great camera, but too expensive. Have an original RX100, but rarely use it - too boring. I prefer my Pentax Q7 - that's where the fun is!
My Samsung NX20 setup is also rarely used. Pentax FTW!

I guess the fun begins only due the interchangeable or manual focus lenses?!?

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 13:43 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2970 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gonini: its getting bigger and heavier, not nice

wow , so much bigger!!!:

http://camerasize.com/compare/#332,555

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 13:40 UTC
Total: 80, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »