Incarnate . . . AGAIN !
Ben Raven: DP,SPEC CLARIFICATION PLEASE:
You are stating the LCD screen rez as 1,230,000 dots That sounded great, except:Sony site is giving it as: their "standard": 921,600
RE:My call for SCREEN SPEC CLARIFICATION:
SONY MIXED SIGNALS:Under "Specifications" Sony states 921,600, as I reported.But in the "Overview" blurb about the screen, they state the same rez spec as RX1(r) i.e. as DP reports: 1,229,000 ??I am choosing to believe the better spec (by the odds, and, frankly my wishes) and that Sony has made the lower Specification rez error.If true: Sony, WTF, it's a most basic spec. get it right.But, again, DP please clarify.
DP,SPEC CLARIFICATION PLEASE:
The most arresting shot of a classic windmill I have ever seen,And one that truly captures the essence of a WINDmill.
WIND and MILL and TIME as one !
A hearty congratulations on your originality.
Wye Photography: Very suitable for your bum pocket. I wonder does the curve fit a really huge ass or a small ass!
If Samsung expects to sell this phone in the US, it had better be for a huuuuge ass . . . and preferably expandable !
I PROFOUNDLY disagree with the implication of photographer Richardson's statement that "his iPhone wasn't exactly capturing "visually profound" images".Maybe HE wasn't. (in his own opinion)
Achieving the "visually profound" is most definitely not just proportional tothe level of technical performance of an artist's instrument, camera or otherwise.
Aaah, so much Leica HYPER-HYPE (trademark that Colbert-style) to choose from in this release.
My fave at the moment though is: "AN EXTRAORDINARILY LARGE SENSOR FOR ITS CLASS with a resolution of 12.1 megapixels".
And for what class, pray tell, would a 1/1.7" sensor be extraordinarily large ? There's only one size smaller in the dying compact market !! Phones, perhaps ?? And even phones soon . . . hmm, maybe the new coming iwatches.
Comedy gold, Leica.
PSA close second is: "the SULTRY BEAUTY of the Leica C". Uh oh, my zoom is extending !
SUPERB, MR. DALI !
Creatively conceived and elegantly executed.(even including the title)
Congrats, you deserve this win.
Powerful, with both "eyes" riveting !
Well done !!
Powerful picture, AC,
A great composition -- the balance of the faceless beggar in the dark and the man rushing past, about his business, into the light -- So much caught, and so much said, in an instant.
Well done, brilliant !
Ben Raven: A powerful image creation.Congrats, well done !
Apologies to carizi below, but I certainly hope for your sake, Samer AIR, that it was not an ACTUAL "capture" !!!!!!!!
Yes Samer AIR, I did realize that it was a long shutter exposure with a light following your face.
I was trying to make a funny remark that I hoped that you had not actually photographed your REAL NIGHTMARE.I hope you understand and get a laugh from what I said.
In any case, it is a super picture !!!By the way, your English is excellent.
A powerful image creation.Congrats, well done !
Worthy to be anyones' best shot !!
. . . and now you're stuck with having to top yourself --and it looks like you're up to it !!
Sweet shot of an obviously sweet kid, paulski66.Really captures the feeling of her natural energy and personality.
Exceptional original composition and perfect use of DOF.
Great shot, zinc,
Wonderful use of DOF to create a feeling of shimmering light, accentingthe deep forest feel of the tree and vine leaves.
What do people know ?Your shot deserves recognition !
Beautiful dreamlike image.Great use of small DOFA perfect match to the challenge.Should have placed way up.
Congratulations esmall on a most well deserved win !
A brilliant and original conception, flawlessly executed.The geometry and lighting are hypnotic.Indeed, most "uncommon" !
A most powerful arresting image. . . . and those eyes !
Composition, focus, bokeh, film choice (and pp) -- it all came together with your talent.
Congrats Mario !
Great lighting choice.
Beautiful shot !!!!
What post did you use to achieve such wonderful "portrait" skin quality ?transformed from the unvarnished reality of "Simply Kathy"(don't know how to interpret the notation: "Skin is photoshopped for model sedcard (?)" sedcard ?Thanx
CONGRATS !A well deserved win.
Indeed, a tough capture to get, but you GOT IT !
A uniquely engaging shot, as viewer and subject Owl meet, eye to eye.And the subtle motion blur of the wings, perfect !
psAdam F. -- agree with you totally.