Peiasdf

Peiasdf

Lives in United States City, NY, United States
Joined on Sep 12, 2008

Comments

Total: 720, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Public employees were getting too fat and lazy to climb the stairs anymore so they had to build a new union-accessible building and demolish this wonderful building.

If Koch can make the subway runs on time why not?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 04:43 UTC

Public employees were getting too fat and lazy to climb the stairs anymore so they had to build a new union-accessible building and demolish this wonderful building.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2014 at 14:14 UTC as 11th comment | 8 replies
On ZTE announces Nubia Z7 with 5.5-inch QHD display post (35 comments in total)

This is not photography news DP. I understand review of iPhones, HTC One, Xperia Z, Galaxy S5 and Nokias because each claim to have new features that will improve photo taking experience but this ZTE make no such claim.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 17:13 UTC as 15th comment | 2 replies
On A look at the Lomography Petzval 85mm F2.2 lens article (156 comments in total)

Lomography, dumb down photography one photo at a time. At least Jersey Shore is off TV so there is hope Lomography will follow.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2014 at 18:53 UTC as 63rd comment
On Sony drops list price of Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 article (201 comments in total)

Now do RX100 III.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2014 at 18:44 UTC as 57th comment | 1 reply
On Budget M43: Kodak Pixpro S-1 First Impressions Review article (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Is it legal to post review of product banned from being sold due to copyright/patent infringement? This is a real question.

Thanks Revenant, I got that mixed up hence the question. I don't suppose DP review that Sakar/ Polaroid camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 14:25 UTC
On Budget M43: Kodak Pixpro S-1 First Impressions Review article (137 comments in total)

Is it legal to post review of product banned from being sold due to copyright/patent infringement? This is a real question.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 24, 2014 at 17:21 UTC as 24th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Saleen1999: Instead of competing with other smartphones, why don't someone come along and compete with cell phone companies so our bill can go down instead of keep going up, up, up. Insane what a cell phone bill is today.

Use T-Mobile. The other three big carriers are trying to kill T-Mobile because it shows what can be done for the market.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2014 at 14:25 UTC
On Panasonic FZ1000: Not just another superzoom... article (158 comments in total)

I think the future is 1" compact cameras and FF for enthusiast / pros. Bridge cameras such as m4/3 and APSC will die out.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 19:03 UTC as 11th comment | 5 replies
On DxOMark Mobile report: Samsung Galaxy S5 post (79 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: Samsung should join serious DSLR world since they are able to make great sensor. Chips and later lenses.

Note 4 is going to use 16mp SONY sensor with OIS so how good is Samsung's ISCELL sensor?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 18:50 UTC

So the sensor is 19.6mp blue + 4.9mp red + 4.9mp green that product image that looks like a downsampled 39mp image?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 18:30 UTC as 12th comment
On Nikon 1 V3: Real-world Sample Images article (175 comments in total)

Good IQ. No par with non-flagship m4/3s.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 14:13 UTC as 41st comment
On A GoPro Hero's journey into a dishwasher article (167 comments in total)

Stop hyping this junk. Just because it is going IPO doesn't mean it is any good.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 14:14 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply
On Sony a6000 Review preview (711 comments in total)

Drop in a FF sensor, IBIS and GPS and we are talking. That's be the best camera of the year.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 14:25 UTC as 135th comment | 3 replies

He love those deep DOF I see. The comparison by The Camera Store put E-M1 ahead of GH4 in S-AF IIRC. It is impressive how far mirrorless from every brand except Canon and Samsung have come.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 14:12 UTC as 27th comment
On LG releases G3 with QHD screen and laser-AF post (60 comments in total)

No off-screen buttons, no unibody construction, no integrated big battery, no front facing stereo speakers, no 64/128GB internal storage and no weatherseal. It is like LG isn't even trying.

SONY Z2 is good only if it has off-screen buttons and iOS.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 14:00 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies
On Lomography seeks crowdfunding for Lomo'Instant Camera article (44 comments in total)

Expecting to see a lot of these in Williamsburg. Goes well with $11 latte.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 13:53 UTC as 7th comment

So what's different from just tilting a high-res photo? Chain camera is cool if you know how to use it and clearly they don't.

Direct link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 00:24 UTC as 32nd comment | 2 replies
On Walmart sues photographer's widow over family pictures article (200 comments in total)

Liberal trash, it is the Waltons suing Bob’s Studio, not Walmart. If you read the source, the Waltons offered $2000 for those boxes of negatives of themselves but Bob’s Huff think she can cash them for more now that the Waltons are rich and famous.

Unless the Waltons were hired as models by Bob's, Huff shouldn't have the right to cash in by selling Waltons' studio photos to tabloids.

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2014 at 14:46 UTC as 54th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Bruce McL: Apple does not use everything that they patent. This is common knowledge. It is also common practice in the tech industry. Every company takes out more patents than they use.

Yet you wrote “Apple aiming to use...” as the title of the article. There is nothing in the article that supports this statement. The closest you come to that is using “could” and “might” in the last paragraph.

I understand you get more page views if you put made up things about Apple in headlines, but the cost is that it makes you look stupid.

Samsung should just pay Apple a license fee for using Apple patents like HTC. Samsung won't because if it did, it would need to fork over $1 billion a year to Apple with the volume Samsung is pushing. Just to note, HTC is paying Apple $6 for ever phone sold because Android's core system is copied from Apple.

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2014 at 20:14 UTC
Total: 720, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »