unlearny

unlearny

Joined on Apr 15, 2010

Comments

Total: 76, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

GordonAtWork: It's a real shame that the quality of tv programming hasn't increased with the technology. Just how much detail would you want to see on Strictly Come Dancing or The X-Factor or The Valleys (Vallies?).

Nowadays, resolution improves bad programming. These folks on the bachelor pad look pretty good, but how do their pores look? Huh? Well?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2012 at 23:52 UTC
In reply to:

munro harrap: What can move that many pixels at a fast enough refresh rate? It wont be workable for 20 years. There will be enormous problems with noise and lag and rolling shutter etc on any capture devices, but, that said there is now going to be a screen with enough resolution to exhibit my stills on, or yours in a museum or gallery- the way they should be seen

good point! It shirley impossibles! You need to call JVC and have them stop selling their 4k kamkorder. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/839193-REG/JVC_GY_HMQ10U_GY_HMQ10_4K_Compact_Handheld.html

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2012 at 23:49 UTC

imagine a sigma DP2M with 24fps 1080p raw output 1080X3... I'm just not feeling very imaginative today. Let's start with that.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2012 at 23:14 UTC as 130th comment
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 sample images article (288 comments in total)

Throwing my two cents in, to the chagrin of all. I think the digital photography story is far from over. Companies are still trying to make an ideal imaging tool that people will love forever, that's worth the price in the consumer's mind. The RX1 solves a couple problems, and has a couple problems.

The ideal camera? I would love a box of these cameras, each at a different focal length, with the speed and ease of the RX100, a full frame foveon sensor with Adobe software written to support it, and a blackmagic thunderbolt or USB 3 (I'm not picky) output dumping 4k video. I would take ten around in a pelican case and never touch a sensor again. I could probably live with just six of them.

I would call the 35mm one Bobby. What was I talking about, again?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 05:29 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On DSC00062 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

I was surprised by the photographer in the far background. I want this camera, but I want most cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 00:45 UTC as 1st comment
On DSC00060 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

12800 looks wow! the sample pics look like the photographer wasn't allowed to leave the grounds of the shopping mall.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 00:33 UTC as 1st comment

Nice viewfinder, but I seem to remember all 35mm p&s zooms having a more elegant system for magnifying the framelines... The viewfinder department doesn't seem to know about optics.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2012 at 09:04 UTC as 18th comment | 3 replies
On Photokina 2012: Sigma Stand Report article (40 comments in total)
In reply to:

HBowman: Ho my God, so much mistakes in this report ...

At first this is a DP2m, showed on the photo. Second, there is lot more to say about new lens line up but it seems Dpreview do not care (or have been paid to no care ? )

The thing that bothers me is how easy it is in photopro to upres to 200% and you never see any upres images here or anywhere else. They say it is because of their standardized system, but they could at least include one (compared to the Pentax 645d?) to illustrate the effect. It would be the same as if they reviewed the Hassy H4D-200MS without including a sample of the multi-shot image.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2012 at 08:54 UTC

M M good... sorry.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 02:53 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

RStyga: Call me shallow but holding a camera with the SONY logo ot its forehead is a huge turn off. And for enthusiasts (i.e., non professionals) it is a big deal. It detracts from the photographic feeling... Why didn't they hide it like Panasonic does in (at least some of) their Lumix series? What's wrong with introducing a similar branding? Even DPReview mentioned that using "Cybershot" for this camera is a brave decision by Sony. Branding is important.

I think that the current CEO started in the mailroom of Minolta and this is final phase of life-long Revenge Fantasy.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 05:38 UTC

Holy Crap!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 05:34 UTC as 30th comment
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview article (277 comments in total)

It looks awesome proving once again that Fujifilm still knows what a real camera looks like... I wish they'd stop hinting around with the stylistic nods and just start making a Digital GW690, wouldn't that be brainmeltingly great? Wouldn't you pay 6000 bucks for one? I probably would, sadly.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2012 at 06:00 UTC as 70th comment | 2 replies

The dp2-m reminds me of the Canonet 2.8 I used to use, and all of those great 45mm cameras of old... what later model P&S cameras had a 45mm f2.8 lens?

This camera reminds me of a Nikon, the Nikon 28Ti QD 35mm, to be exact... a very cool camera to pay tribute to.

If mainstream Photographers figure out the imaging power of these cameras, and start to embrace the brand and really funding Sigma, I bet we'll see a Hologon Based "DP0m" in no time... how about a fast macro DP3m? Since these cameras cost about the same as a lens, I would clear a shelf in my collection for whatever sigma can come up with.

Hopefully sales will support the kind of game changing features that need to be developed to make the next SD a truly competitive tool.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2012 at 19:48 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

Imagician: Part - II

The difference between the 5D II and SD1 images was also wide but not so much, but the 5D II is a much better sensor than the 24 MP APS-C chip of the D3200.

I also "downrezzed" the Nikon D800 E to 24 MP. It showed a better resolution than the Sigma, unquestionably. I uprezzed the Sigma image now to 30 MP and downrezzed the D800 E one to 30 MP. The Sigma was still holding up well, but it showed that now the SD1 was at its limit. I was just bowled over.

The per-pixel sharpness is jaw-dropping. I didn't compare the other sensors since as far as resolution is concerned, these 3 cameras are the Bayer benchmarks. Perhaps, the M9 also should have been checked.

This is not a P&S. It cannot do what most P&S do and the RX100 does rather well. But what it does, it does to a perfection that is unrivaled by any thing less than the D800 (which I didn't check) and D800 E.

Nice to see that you get it about the SD1, and that you felt it important enough to post a novel about it. That is how I used to be on these boards, but the crowd don't like it. I have posted an RX100 vs DP2m full sized jpegs on Flickr you might wanna visit.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9729517@N04/sets/72157631312117380/

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2012 at 19:24 UTC

If anyone cares I took some side by side photos using both the Sigma DP2 Merrill and the Sony RX100 and posted full size jpegs on Flickr.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9729517@N04/sets/72157631312117380/comments/#comment72157631347851076

cut and paste or search "rx100 vs dp2 merrill" on FLICKR

I therefore need to save up a tad before I can buy my DP1-M...I hope Lensmate will get going on some accessories.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 1, 2012 at 09:32 UTC as 39th comment | 5 replies
On marie69 photo in Luxius Radius's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

cool

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2012 at 01:12 UTC as 1st comment
On P1020667 photo in Pap38's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

That moth is amazing. It looks like a satellite dish!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2012 at 01:05 UTC as 1st comment
On DSC_9546 photo in sparkle1103's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

holy crow! nice shot!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2012 at 01:02 UTC as 1st comment
On SDIM2482_HD photo in Tom Schum's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

crap that is nice

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2012 at 01:01 UTC as 1st comment

Sergey Borachev seem dedicated to making some long anti-sigma screed in every single comment. The SD1 works... has quirks, just like every camera on the market, and inconveniences that Canon users, and more recently Nikon users don't have to worry about... like live view. God I wish my SD1m had Live View.

But I use the SD1M when I want resolution and micro-detail that is unavailable in anything less than a Leica S2. I am giving Leica the benefit of the doubt on this one. I assume that their 30-something megapixel camera comes close, maybe the D800E does too, I haven't seen comparisons.

Speaking of Leica and the DP2M, Sigma was the first to design an APS sensor P&S camera and everyone turned up their noses. Then the X1 and the X100 followed, utilized the basic imaging philosophy of the DP2, to the adulation of all. Sigma isn't as large as their competitors in terms of income or budget, but they are still making breakthrough cameras, at least Leica & Fuji think so.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2012 at 23:04 UTC as 6th comment
Total: 76, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »