GordonAtWork: It's a real shame that the quality of tv programming hasn't increased with the technology. Just how much detail would you want to see on Strictly Come Dancing or The X-Factor or The Valleys (Vallies?).
Nowadays, resolution improves bad programming. These folks on the bachelor pad look pretty good, but how do their pores look? Huh? Well?
munro harrap: What can move that many pixels at a fast enough refresh rate? It wont be workable for 20 years. There will be enormous problems with noise and lag and rolling shutter etc on any capture devices, but, that said there is now going to be a screen with enough resolution to exhibit my stills on, or yours in a museum or gallery- the way they should be seen
good point! It shirley impossibles! You need to call JVC and have them stop selling their 4k kamkorder. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/839193-REG/JVC_GY_HMQ10U_GY_HMQ10_4K_Compact_Handheld.html
imagine a sigma DP2M with 24fps 1080p raw output 1080X3... I'm just not feeling very imaginative today. Let's start with that.
Throwing my two cents in, to the chagrin of all. I think the digital photography story is far from over. Companies are still trying to make an ideal imaging tool that people will love forever, that's worth the price in the consumer's mind. The RX1 solves a couple problems, and has a couple problems.
The ideal camera? I would love a box of these cameras, each at a different focal length, with the speed and ease of the RX100, a full frame foveon sensor with Adobe software written to support it, and a blackmagic thunderbolt or USB 3 (I'm not picky) output dumping 4k video. I would take ten around in a pelican case and never touch a sensor again. I could probably live with just six of them.
I would call the 35mm one Bobby. What was I talking about, again?
I was surprised by the photographer in the far background. I want this camera, but I want most cameras.
12800 looks wow! the sample pics look like the photographer wasn't allowed to leave the grounds of the shopping mall.
Nice viewfinder, but I seem to remember all 35mm p&s zooms having a more elegant system for magnifying the framelines... The viewfinder department doesn't seem to know about optics.
HBowman: Ho my God, so much mistakes in this report ...
At first this is a DP2m, showed on the photo. Second, there is lot more to say about new lens line up but it seems Dpreview do not care (or have been paid to no care ? )
The thing that bothers me is how easy it is in photopro to upres to 200% and you never see any upres images here or anywhere else. They say it is because of their standardized system, but they could at least include one (compared to the Pentax 645d?) to illustrate the effect. It would be the same as if they reviewed the Hassy H4D-200MS without including a sample of the multi-shot image.
M M good... sorry.
RStyga: Call me shallow but holding a camera with the SONY logo ot its forehead is a huge turn off. And for enthusiasts (i.e., non professionals) it is a big deal. It detracts from the photographic feeling... Why didn't they hide it like Panasonic does in (at least some of) their Lumix series? What's wrong with introducing a similar branding? Even DPReview mentioned that using "Cybershot" for this camera is a brave decision by Sony. Branding is important.
I think that the current CEO started in the mailroom of Minolta and this is final phase of life-long Revenge Fantasy.
It looks awesome proving once again that Fujifilm still knows what a real camera looks like... I wish they'd stop hinting around with the stylistic nods and just start making a Digital GW690, wouldn't that be brainmeltingly great? Wouldn't you pay 6000 bucks for one? I probably would, sadly.
The dp2-m reminds me of the Canonet 2.8 I used to use, and all of those great 45mm cameras of old... what later model P&S cameras had a 45mm f2.8 lens?
This camera reminds me of a Nikon, the Nikon 28Ti QD 35mm, to be exact... a very cool camera to pay tribute to.
If mainstream Photographers figure out the imaging power of these cameras, and start to embrace the brand and really funding Sigma, I bet we'll see a Hologon Based "DP0m" in no time... how about a fast macro DP3m? Since these cameras cost about the same as a lens, I would clear a shelf in my collection for whatever sigma can come up with.
Hopefully sales will support the kind of game changing features that need to be developed to make the next SD a truly competitive tool.
Imagician: Part - II
The difference between the 5D II and SD1 images was also wide but not so much, but the 5D II is a much better sensor than the 24 MP APS-C chip of the D3200.
I also "downrezzed" the Nikon D800 E to 24 MP. It showed a better resolution than the Sigma, unquestionably. I uprezzed the Sigma image now to 30 MP and downrezzed the D800 E one to 30 MP. The Sigma was still holding up well, but it showed that now the SD1 was at its limit. I was just bowled over.
The per-pixel sharpness is jaw-dropping. I didn't compare the other sensors since as far as resolution is concerned, these 3 cameras are the Bayer benchmarks. Perhaps, the M9 also should have been checked.
This is not a P&S. It cannot do what most P&S do and the RX100 does rather well. But what it does, it does to a perfection that is unrivaled by any thing less than the D800 (which I didn't check) and D800 E.
Nice to see that you get it about the SD1, and that you felt it important enough to post a novel about it. That is how I used to be on these boards, but the crowd don't like it. I have posted an RX100 vs DP2m full sized jpegs on Flickr you might wanna visit.
If anyone cares I took some side by side photos using both the Sigma DP2 Merrill and the Sony RX100 and posted full size jpegs on Flickr.http://www.flickr.com/photos/9729517@N04/sets/72157631312117380/comments/#comment72157631347851076
cut and paste or search "rx100 vs dp2 merrill" on FLICKR
I therefore need to save up a tad before I can buy my DP1-M...I hope Lensmate will get going on some accessories.
That moth is amazing. It looks like a satellite dish!
holy crow! nice shot!