Roland Schulz

Lives in Germany NRW, Germany
Works as a electrical engineer
Joined on May 16, 2004
About me:

Nikon D4
Nikon D3
Nikon D2X
Fujifilm Finepix S2pro
Ricoh GR
Sony NEX-5 (sold)
Sony NEX-7 (sold)
Panasonic LX100
Sony RX-100 II
Panasonic LX5 (sold)
Nikon F4s

Nikon 70-200 VRII 2.8G AF-S ED
Nikon 24-70 2.8G AF-S ED
Nikon 14-24 2.8G AF-S ED (sold)
Nikon 24-120 VR 4.0G AF-S ED
Nikon 85 1.4G AF
Nikon 60 2.8D AF micro
Nikon 50 1.4G AF
Nikon 35 1.4G AF
Nikon 105 2.8G VR micro
Nikon 18-35G AF (sold)
Nikon 16-35 4.0G AF
Sigma 50 1.4 Art
Sony SEL 18-55 3.5-5.6 (sold)
Sony SEL 50 1.8 (sold)
Sony CZ SEL 24 1.8 (sold)
Sony SEL 55-210 (sold)

Nikon SB900
Nikon SB910
Nikon SB800 (4x)
Nikon SB29s
Nikon SB28

Epson Stylus Pro 3880
Epson Stylus Pro 3800 (died)
Canon i9950

Gitzo 1541
Gitzo 2542L
Manfrotto 055Pro MF3 + MGRC0 + others

i7 4770k (Win7/64) - 24GB
MacBook Pro Retina 13" 8/512GB
EIZO CG276
X-Rite i1 Publisher Pro 2 (i1Pro2)
X-Rite i1 Display pro
DTP94B (sold)
DTP70 (sold)
Monaco Profiler Gold
Wacom INTUOS Pro S
etc.

Comments

Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

ABSOLUTELY IMPRESSIVE how good the Nikon D500 performs in a comparison to the fat boys!!!
Being a D4 guy I´m still a bit disappointed of the D5´s DR performance while high ISO is really good, but the D500 again shows that Nikon is still the king in APS-C!

Link | Posted on May 5, 2016 at 08:33 UTC as 36th comment

Not bad, but is this the full truth?! Is the PD AF now compensated in regards of light temperature?
With my D4 it is not. Simply do a test using a D4, 85 1.4G and the AF illuminator of a SB910 for example. This lens tuned to "daylight" is way off when using the SB910 AF illuminator. There were many talks about issues regaring AF accuracy using PD AF cameras under different lightning.
No problem with a mirrorless...

When I look at the latest samples here using the D5 with 35 1.4G I can´t ignore that some pictures are still OOF, even with this masterpiece of AF system.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 19:19 UTC as 38th comment | 1 reply

I also have mixed feelings with these results:

The good is that the D5 seems to hold up to the same good pixel level noise performance the D4/s already had - but here at a higher resolution now.

The bad is that base ISO DR went down the first time in the D2x, D3, D4 era. For me a no go!

Video is even becoming more important for me, but seems Nikon left out many chances in comparison to others, especially to the upcoming EOS 1DxII.

Maybe there will be other strengths like ground breaking AF performance that many photographers will like - but for me it seems that I will leave this generation out (had and still have D2x, D3, D4).

Sorry Nikon, for "me" the D5 seems becoming a fail...

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 09:18 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

vermaden: Why bother about X70 while SONY RX100III is superior to it in almost every aspect (even size) while having a lot more versatile 24-70/1.8-2.8 lens ... not to mention RX100IV ...

LOL!! ...my GR is running circles around my RX100II and III especially in regards of corner sharpness - but the RX100x is a very good allaround camera!!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 15:13 UTC
In reply to:

PCN: Don't just compare with the Coolpix A or Ricoh, have a look at the Fuji vs. the Sigma DP1 (merrill), especially the RAW file.

...but don´t look at high ISO, lower contrast chroma resolution, overall speed... ;-)!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 15:10 UTC
On article GoPro's poor holiday sales lead to staff layoff (124 comments in total)

Sony beat's them all...

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 10:37 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies

Is it just me - sharpness of the samples isn't that great compared to the Ricoh GR!??
Beside of that nice camera, like the manual controls over the GR!

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 06:18 UTC as 37th comment
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (554 comments in total)

Thank you Nikon, you make me spending another 6.500 bucks!!!
Really great specs!! I´m looking forward for the real AF performance, especially precision! I´m also hungry for the real high ISO performance, I expect it somewhat better than the D4 - how much, we´ll see.
Also video became important for me, would have hoped for 60p UHD, but also 24/30p is ok for me.
Seems to become a really nice camera, looking forward to getting one!!

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:43 UTC as 80th comment
On Connect post Apple reveals 12.9-inch iPad Pro (212 comments in total)

Hmm, I was looking forward to a larger iPad to present photos better.
Now also the 4K video train completely arrived - but what about the display resolution of this device?! Neither native 4K nor UHD resolution (+additional vertical pixels for the aspect ratio)?!?! Steve Jobs himself had stated this as a fail!!!

I bet iPad Pro 2 will have native 4K/UHD res...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 19:18 UTC as 14th comment
On article Apple reveals 12.9-inch iPad Pro (212 comments in total)

Hmm, I was looking forward to a larger iPad to present photos better.
Now also the 4K video train completely arrived - but what about the display resolution of this device?! Neither native 4K nor UHD resolution (+additional vertical pixels for the aspect ratio)?!?! Steve Jobs himself had stated this as a fail!!!

I bet iPad Pro 2 will have native 4K/UHD res...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 19:18 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Roland Schulz: Ok folks, nice test, but not completely honest: The Sony may beat Nikon´s or Canon´s best AF systems in low light using a F1.4 lens, but that´s only half the truth for wedding photographers that often take F2.8 zooms or even F4.0 to be more versatile. I bet Nikon and even Canon run´s smoking circles around the Sony using F4.0 zooms – why? Simply because common dSLR phase detect AF systems work with an internal let´s say F8 AF system, result is that lenses up to F8 doesn´t alter the AF performance. Not so with the Sony, here the AF system hitting light is limited only by the lens, but a hefty F5.6 500mm telezoom would influence the AF by 4 stops where Nikon and Canon work as before. This fact wasn´t “pronounced” in this video. So maybe the A7RII´s AF is not the holy grail for some (many) folks.
Would really be nice to see a comparison with F4 lenses!!

On the other hand on sensor AF has many advantages as described, compared to dSLRs there will hardly be a front-/backfocus.

I often shoot 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 in really dark conditions on a D4 and yes, there are several hit and miss but I don´t expect the 7RII to be any better here, no, I expect the opposite. Not to forget that there is no SEL 24-70 or 70-200 2.8 yet and because of the narrow E-Mount there will probably never be.

And yes, you can also shoot 500+mm in dark conditions doing wildlife from a tripod.

Don´t understand me wrong, the 7RII is for sure an OUTSTANDING camera, but I find this test and "promotion" a bit biased. Nikon and Canon is "rubbish", Sony beat´s them all - maybe one day...

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2015 at 16:38 UTC

Ok folks, nice test, but not completely honest: The Sony may beat Nikon´s or Canon´s best AF systems in low light using a F1.4 lens, but that´s only half the truth for wedding photographers that often take F2.8 zooms or even F4.0 to be more versatile. I bet Nikon and even Canon run´s smoking circles around the Sony using F4.0 zooms – why? Simply because common dSLR phase detect AF systems work with an internal let´s say F8 AF system, result is that lenses up to F8 doesn´t alter the AF performance. Not so with the Sony, here the AF system hitting light is limited only by the lens, but a hefty F5.6 500mm telezoom would influence the AF by 4 stops where Nikon and Canon work as before. This fact wasn´t “pronounced” in this video. So maybe the A7RII´s AF is not the holy grail for some (many) folks.
Would really be nice to see a comparison with F4 lenses!!

On the other hand on sensor AF has many advantages as described, compared to dSLRs there will hardly be a front-/backfocus.

Link | Posted on Aug 20, 2015 at 16:44 UTC as 191st comment | 8 replies

Well done, Mark (Weir), absolutely very well done!!!

This will be the very most exciting camera in 2015 and probably further, leaving everything and everyone else behind in dense dust!!

But this is only the current top of the mountain, current strategy and products like lenses, also cooperation with Zeiss (Batis) shows that Sony really has taken off the gloves now!!
This is Sony as I liked in my childhood, this is innovation and power - again - I'm speechless!!

Awesome work, Mark!!

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 22:37 UTC as 182nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

PaulDavis: I have never seen so many positive comments for any product on this website. Way to go Sony.

I am a Nikon guy (D4/D3...), but this is really groundbreaking!!!

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 22:12 UTC
In reply to:

Anadrol: Am I the only one shocked by the price ? 3200 $ !!!

The A7R cost initially 2300 USD...

Price is ok for what you get!!

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 22:10 UTC
In reply to:

Horshack: Amazing how $1,800 lenses can have a decentered/tilted element. It's something you expect (and get) on a Samyang 14mm but not on a class of lens like the 14-24mm. Sadly it's a problem seen on many expensive optics. I've tried three different copies of a Canon 24-70 f/2.8L II and all have had significant tilting issues.

I also had two 14-24 Nikon where the first was a paperweight. The second was very fine but I also sold it after antime because I used it less.

Btw., I had 10!! 24-70 2.8G and my first and oldest is still the best but focusing with the very left AF sensor at 50mm. All the other were worse somewhere...

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 21:26 UTC
On photo G7X-ISO125-IMG_0260 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Nice photos, Jeff! But for the camera - the photos look somewhat better than the stuff I´ve seen to date - in my eyes that lens is inferior to the RX100I-III lenses, and even these were never near perfect.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2014 at 08:33 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Canon PowerShot G7 X photo gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Nice photos, Jeff! But for the camera - the photos look somewhat better than the stuff I´ve seen to date - in my eyes that lens is inferior to the RX100I-III lenses, and even these were never near perfect.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2014 at 08:33 UTC as 1st comment
On article Nikon Df combines classic design with modern technology (314 comments in total)

VERY NICE, well done, congratulations Nikon!!
Cute design, especially the silver one!
Best sensor, fair size and weigth, I think this camera will win many friends!!
Maybe I will get one beside my D4.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 12:34 UTC as 70th comment
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review (517 comments in total)
In reply to:

Roland Schulz: Reviews are coming down here: The new test scene is not where it should be.
I still have both cameras and tested for DR and noise. MKII is definitely better in DR (especially using ACR), here they found the opposite. ISO sensitivity is not accurate since RX100 ISO125 is as ISO160 on RX100II, so one must be wrong. Why are there no noise tests below ISO160? ISO100 is definitely better on the MKII than native ISO160, but I see only a whiny tiny bit of loss in DR, so I always use ISO100 as long as light allows that. The lens seems decentered from the test sample here. Ok, my first RX100 was decentered, too.
For me the MKII is about one stop better in the end, about half a stop in noise and half a stop in DR. So for me the MKII is an improvement. Lens could get somewhat better, but in the end for me the very best camera in that size and somewhat about, large headroom for PP. More than worth the price for me...

Roland.

Rechtshänder ;-)!!! The MKII for me, the MKI for my partner during last holidays. Now the MKI is going to eBay...

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2013 at 06:41 UTC
Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »