Seems like a laughable waste if time to me
I loved my MGB back in the late 60's but wouldn't want one now. Same idea for this one.
16 Megapixels seems so passé
Reilly Diefenbach: Still 299, still way too much.
Buy an IQ digital back you'll get it free
What's film ?
Makes a Sony RX1 look like a good deal
I had a Fuji DS300 back in 1997. I think it cost about $2500. One megapixel ! Wasn't bad though well made
Nice to see an article like this instead of the latest piece of techno trash
Mushy photos = Silver Award ? That's weird
ArcaSwiss: Preordered one from B&H today.
So you are an a-hole
Preordered one from B&H today.
glacierpete: A Sigma DP3M with a 50/2.8 Macro lens is about € 600 after Sigma's cash back promo. The only thing the DPxM's lack is an EFV or OVF. Other than that the resolution, micro contrast and colors are great. But it is definitely not a high iso camera. :)
Yeah but you're stuck with Sugma's crappy raw processor, snail like write speeds and abysmal battery life
I'd never buy anything with the name Samsung on it
That gives me wood...oops I mean takes me back to my days of building electric guitars. The knobs are straight off a Stratocaster
My disgust with Adobe pales in comparison to my disgust with the US government. But they do have a lot in common.
Who cares I'm never giving Adobe another cent.
And of course you can buy it on Amazon !
ArcaSwiss: You'd have to be a real cheap ass to buy it over the Canon one. Heck I just dropped $15,000 on a Phase Ilone IQ140 :)
When I said bitch I didn't mean a dog. Talking about a female human. I've no use for one, never met one who is worthy
My house and car are paid for, I don't have a bitch, and I need the write off. And yes it's really really good
You'd have to be a real cheap ass to buy it over the Canon one. Heck I just dropped $15,000 on a Phase Ilone IQ140 :)