The Silver Fox

The Silver Fox

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Feb 29, 2012

Comments

Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

John McCormack: Good news. Now if Olympus will only put some money into R&D for fabled Olympus Trip digital we've been waiting for...

Why, Tedolph, you’re back! Glad to see you here.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2015 at 02:18 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know (612 comments in total)
In reply to:

pacnwhobbyist: Something I've been wondering: Where are Nikon and Olympus with their competing larger sensor compacts and bridges? I'd be interested to see what they come up with if they ever released a camera in this segment.

Olympus has cryptically stated that it will unveil a “street shooter’s dream camera” later this year. My hope is precisely that it will be a large sensor compact (imagine an XZ-2 with a 1" or even ⅔" sensor).

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 05:32 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100T Review (686 comments in total)
In reply to:

chillgreg: Ren Kockwell called the X100T the best camera in the world. Which gives even more credence to the DPR Silver award. Well done Richard!

Really? Do we need to resort to ad hominem attacks? Whatever you might think of Ken Rockwell’s opinions doesn’t justify personal attacks. Most unattractive.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 05:59 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100T Review (686 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: It's a very nice camera and all but the RAW output is still fuzzy with pixel-level artifacts due to the X-Trans structure. Fujifilm needs to resolve the RAW conversion otherwise X-Trans will become synonymous to low high-ISO noise at the expense of "double"-AA-filter style IQ. At a time where manufacturers remove the AA filter to achieve a crisper image, Fujifilm advertises a sensor with no need for an AA filter but -in essence- with an even more blurry IQ than traditional Bayer sensor that have an AA filter. No moire is great but I'm not sure why one would prefer an X-Trans camera since applying PP on a Bayer sensor can remove moire completely and obtain the same "blurry" image that an X-Trans camera produces.

I believe a better solution is simply to abandon the X-Trans sensor and return to a Bayer sensor. But I suspect Fuji is too invested in X-Trans to do this. Too bad, since a next-gen X-100 with a Bayer sensor would be remarkable.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 05:50 UTC
On article A Compact PEN: Olympus Stylus SH-2 Hands-on (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Naveed Akhtar: they should consider making an lx100 competitor with this beautiful body and an extended lens focal length range.

If Olympus could match Panasonic LX100's specs, but with beautiful Olympus color, I'd purchase it in a heartbeat.

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2015 at 23:24 UTC
In reply to:

ttran88: Give me 24MP with A6000 AF and I will buy as my apsc camera system. The Canon of the APSC mirrorless world. Gotta love fujifilm.

@kwa_photo: It might just be time for Fuji to ditch the X-Trans sensor. As the resolution in their sensor climbs, the benefits of the X-Trans over Bayer diminishes. And with a return to Bayer, they can hopefully improve their video capabilities as well.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 07:50 UTC
On article Budget X: Hands-on with Fujifilm's new X-A2 (163 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Good price but hate it that Fuji purposely strip away X-tans and direct-dial controls. I like my X-E1 but since I never use the EVF, I could easily see this as a smaller/lighter alternative.

If you don't like that the X-A1 or X-A2 are not equipped with the X-Trans sensor, you need only look to the virtually identical X-M1, which does indeed have the X-Trans sensor.

As for me, I am glad that Fuji is keeping at least one of its cameras in the X-line with the traditional Bayer sensor.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2015 at 23:54 UTC
On article Past and present: NYC's changing streetscape (49 comments in total)

Fascinating. Always great to see this kind of street photography that shows the passage of time.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 08:25 UTC as 24th comment
In reply to:

Jogger: I still shoot my D700 from late 2007.. the problem for Nikon is that i dont need to buy a new DSLR every year the way people do with mirrorless cameras. That is what is driving that market and why companies are trying to get in.

Consumers in the mirorrless segment of the market will buy lackluster cameras only to upgrade then annually (just read the m43 forum)... whereas a DSLR will last you a decade or more. Nothing glamourous here, nothing to show-off.. just a rock solid DSLR that does its job and lasts.

I agree with HFLM. I am a strong proponent for mirrorless (I own one, along with my DSLR), but it must be recognized that mirrorless cameras have been playing catch-up these last few years. Only now (perhaps since the release of the Olympus OM-D EM-5) are mirrorless at a level where they can replace DSLR's for many users (not every user, understand).

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2014 at 00:27 UTC
On article Google pulls plug on desktop version of Snapseed (63 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: I was a little upset when they discontinues igoogle.com ...it brought everything together into the best homepage we had ever seen.

Google used to be a one stop shop for a diversity of tidbits - tools here and there - that made it compelling to use google.

But as google sheds parts and components because of money problems and internal cost-cutting, it is becoming less and less attractive.

The whole was worth far more than the sum of it's parts... and now that they are breaking everything off, the ship is sinking for me.

Time to jump ship - Google has rendered itself useless to me.

Bing. Out of protest.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2013 at 00:45 UTC
On article Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested (138 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kinematic Digit: Some improvements from what I've seen so far on one of my toughest reference images I use to compare. The Watercolour effect (colour smearing) is much improved. Details is still lower than competing products like Capture One and SilkyPix. More testing to do and will publish my own results against the rest.

@Kinematic Digit
Thank you, Mr. Lam, for your report. It provides clarity on some questions I had about this update.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 05:58 UTC
In reply to:

jbagg: The absence of any mention of Apple Camera RAW in the article is quite striking. Apple Camera RAW is used by both Aperture and iPhoto. Despite the fact that Apple Camera RAW works on only one platform, I would not be surprised to find out that there are more Apple Camera RAW users out there an CaptureOne and DxO combined, if not more than Adobe Camera RAW as well. Lightroom has a larger market share than Aperture, but Aperture and its sibling iPhoto together represent a very large market.

Agreed. I would have liked to see Aperture included because so many of us use it.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2013 at 00:55 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): What about Apple Aperture??

The introduction to the article specifically mentioned that one of the criteria for being included in this review was that the program run on both Windows and Mac. Since Aperture is a Mac-only program, it was excluded. As an Aperture user, I too would have liked to see it go head to head with the others.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2013 at 00:53 UTC

This seems quite exciting. Offerings like this are making m4/3's too hard to ignore.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 05:06 UTC as 120th comment | 2 replies
On article Digital camera lens buying guide (57 comments in total)

Thanks for this!

Link | Posted on May 21, 2012 at 03:52 UTC as 37th comment
In reply to:

Vince876: Well. Now Panasonic or Olympus can make a copy of a m4/3 camera without the color array. It should not be expensive and puts a good idea at an earthly level.

Even further, without the IR-UV cut filter.

Not the hi-end cameras, something like the GF2. They could be not expensive and maybe cheap. With very good lenses ten times better than the Leica ones in terms of rendition/cost.

Hear, hear. My thoughts exactly.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 22:47 UTC
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (577 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Silver Fox: Ideas on what flash to pair with this bad boy? I know it's all the rage nowadays to shoot without flash, but it *does* have its uses!

Thank you all for your thoughtful replies — Very helpful!

Link | Posted on May 9, 2012 at 19:55 UTC
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (577 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Silver Fox: I'm sold on the OM-D and will buy one next month. While I plan to invest in several of the primes, I will also get an Oly zoom lens for general purpose shooting. But I'm unsure which kit lens to go with. Any suggestions?

I understand that the 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 is weather-sealed, which is a great thing to have for travel. However, both the 14-150mm 1:4-5.6 and the 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R are equally compact, with 3 times the zoom capability. Coming from SLR's, I'm new to m4/3, so I'm free to invest as needed. Though I've been taking pictures since a wee lad, I'm a relative newcomer to serious photography, and an out-and-out newcomer when it comes to m4/3. So, any help would be appreciated.

Thank you all for your thoughtful replies — Very helpful!

Link | Posted on May 9, 2012 at 19:54 UTC
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (577 comments in total)

Ideas on what flash to pair with this bad boy? I know it's all the rage nowadays to shoot without flash, but it *does* have its uses!

Link | Posted on May 3, 2012 at 06:06 UTC as 19th comment | 4 replies
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (577 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Silver Fox: I'm sold on the OM-D and will buy one next month. While I plan to invest in several of the primes, I will also get an Oly zoom lens for general purpose shooting. But I'm unsure which kit lens to go with. Any suggestions?

I understand that the 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 is weather-sealed, which is a great thing to have for travel. However, both the 14-150mm 1:4-5.6 and the 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R are equally compact, with 3 times the zoom capability. Coming from SLR's, I'm new to m4/3, so I'm free to invest as needed. Though I've been taking pictures since a wee lad, I'm a relative newcomer to serious photography, and an out-and-out newcomer when it comes to m4/3. So, any help would be appreciated.

Mssimo,

Thanks for the reply. Did you mean the 12-50mm or the 14-150mm?

Link | Posted on May 3, 2012 at 00:35 UTC
Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »