Erik van den Elsen

Erik van den Elsen

Lives in Ede
Joined on Jun 7, 2007

Comments

Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: All they need to do is break the price barrier by making a affordable MF system.

Come up with a 3000 to 3500 dollar MF body, that has the looks of the 500c and a few affordable lenses and sales will soar through the roof.

I think Hasselblad lost all connection with the photography world.
The money in this market is not to be made with the rich, but with the people that have a true heart for photography.

Unfortunately, their Headquarters is in Sweden...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 08:40 UTC
In reply to:

zzzxtreme: Please continue rebadging cameras so we can have a laugh. We need a joke in the photography industry

Indeed, rebadging others' camera's doesn't do the Hasselblad brand any good... Does Hasselblad really need this, pasting a wooden grip to others' bodies?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 08:25 UTC
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: All they need to do is break the price barrier by making a affordable MF system.

Come up with a 3000 to 3500 dollar MF body, that has the looks of the 500c and a few affordable lenses and sales will soar through the roof.

I think Hasselblad lost all connection with the photography world.
The money in this market is not to be made with the rich, but with the people that have a true heart for photography.

Very true.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 08:24 UTC
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

pew pew: @dpreview rather show the portfolio of some dpreview members, theres some excellent photographers on the forums, then this pseudo wannabe artsy photos.

...think before you write...

Direct link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 12:37 UTC
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

ironcam: I don't think this guy deserves all of the hate. I think he is only a humble person who loves photography just like any of us. The blame is on dpreview who puts him in this embarrassing spot. How would you guys feel if dpreview put your flickr account up, claim you're the next Ansel Adams en let everyone laugh at you?

I don't think this is completely true; I assume DPreview asked Luke for permission before spending an article on him? If you want to be in the spotlight, you risk being loved or being maligned... I see both types of comment appear here.

All is a matter of taste; are the images good or not? It depends on who looks at them. I can imagine some people like them.

I myself don't like them; the majority is underexposed (or is that artistic?) fail to have a real subject/are not composed, and are therefore totally uninteresting to me. I would not expect these images to be a product of a three-year course in graphic design and photography at a University.

But as I said before, this might work differently for someone else.

Direct link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 12:34 UTC
In reply to:

davidrm: Oh, he used a Leica S2, so it must be art.....

Leaving aside sarcasm and cheap shots, which given the prentention of this series are all to easy, from an art perspective I don't see much value either. There seems to be no coherent vision, just randomness. And absolutely no oiginality of expression.

Whatever, he's not hurting anyone.

Totally agree; you can 'sell' anything as long as you call it 'art'... I wouldn't like to put my name under it.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 11:04 UTC
On Fujifilm X-M1 Preview preview (226 comments in total)
In reply to:

Acrill: " Overall, the X-M1's feature set and form factor places it squarely up against cameras like the Sony NEX-5R and Olympus PEN-EPL5."

Nonsense.

The newer PEN cameras blow this one out of the water in terms of features. Its not even close.
Touch interface is a massively important feature for a camera with this form factor, and the PENs, along with Panasonic GF and GX cameras do not skimp on other shooting features such as face detection, electronic levels and optional viewfinders.

I don't care too much about a touch screen or any other of these 'fancy' features; as long as the camera can be operated by buttons it's fine with me.
What I DO care much about is image quality (in fact that's what it is ALL about).

Earlier tests with X-Pro and XE-1 show that the APS-C sensor in the X-series delivers superior image quality compared to all other brands (including Oly, Panasonic and Sony), even better IQ than many reflex systems.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2013 at 10:08 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Preview preview (75 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jorginho: And to me here is the dilemma which I think will come with all APS-c mirrorless camera's and zooms: this is getting really big. It is heavier than my 100-300 mm zoom for my m43 cam and it is about the same size. It is only slightly faster.
The Fuji most likely is an excellent lens and the XE1 as a cam is a step up in IQ over any m43 cam out there.

Personally, I think like this: that lens is forever, that body is exchangable. And m43 sensors will get there soon enough. Also, the Sony sensor in it still has very good IQ, better than any Canon APS-c for example. So I go for the clear size and weight advantage.

Very good to sdee Fuji delivering constantly with their lenses for APS-c. As I said: I have little doubt this one will be very very good and for those who prefer APS-c mirrorless, Fuji seems to be the system you want to get.

...and you might as well DELETE the last sentence...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 11:14 UTC
On Fujifilm X-E1 preview extended article (113 comments in total)
In reply to:

rusticus: without a "window" on the front of the camera is ugly - the classic style is broken. . .

ok, then DON't buy it! I buy a camera for the pictures it delivers...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 08:17 UTC
On Fujifilm X-E1 preview extended article (113 comments in total)
In reply to:

grafli: I'm ipressed with the high ISO capabilities! This stuff wasn't possible even 2 Years ago. (It has better IQ than my EOS 7D)

...well being better than the 7D isn't such an achievement (I own one myself)...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 08:16 UTC
On Adobe Photoshop CS6 for Photographers article (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paradigm Changer: There's something broken with the hues on the cover. Not pretty at all.

...thanks for mentioning this most important point about the book...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 12:54 UTC
On Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM Preview preview (129 comments in total)

I find this an awkward new Canon lens; I own the 24-105 F/4 L lens myself and find it very good, at least I have a very sharp copy. The current price of this 24-105 is now around 900 Euro.

So, why spend 600 euro more on a lens that has a much shorter range (24-70) but the same speed? Just because it has a Macro feature that you use every now and then? If you're really into macro, you will buy a dedicated Macro lens.

This lens sounds superfluous to me already from the beginning seen the rest of the Canon lens line-up and the range it offers... And this price is really rediculous! Much too expensive just like all other Canon lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 12:36 UTC as 51st comment | 5 replies
On PT3C0310 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Image is super sharp, IQ great, but composition of this sample couldn't be worse. My grandma could do better... Sorry DPR...

But then this has nothing to do with the camera of course.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:59 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

Image is super sharp, IQ great, but composition of this sample couldn't be worse. My grandma could do better... Sorry DPR...

But then this has nothing to do with the camera of course.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:59 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mazevision: LOT of noise for ISO 4000, front eye out of focus (was it intentional?), WB a bit purple (to my eye). Bad example IMO.

True, bad example; difficult to judge a camera from bad pictures...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:56 UTC
On PT3C0431-ACRprocessed photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mazevision: LOT of noise for ISO 4000, front eye out of focus (was it intentional?), WB a bit purple (to my eye). Bad example IMO.

True, bad example; difficult to judge a camera from bad pictures...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:56 UTC
On PT3C0081 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: Skin color is not the strongest point of this camera.

No, skin tone is not excellent since this is a mixed light situation (window to the left, fluorescent light from the right) ; not a single camera can produce natural skin tone under these circumstances.

Price is way too high though.. who will buy it? For some this is 2 months salaries!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:54 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: Skin color is not the strongest point of this camera.

No, skin tone is not excellent since this is a mixed light situation (window to the left, fluorescent light from the right) ; not a single camera can produce natural skin tone under these circumstances.

Price is way too high though.. who will buy it? For some this is 2 months salaries!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:54 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stollen1234: skin tione are natural..but ist me or what..looks like the skin is not sharp at all

Sharpness is excellent, but DOF is shallow due to F1.4. Look at the hairs on the underlip! C'mon give the Canon engineers a break.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:53 UTC
On PT3C0081 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stollen1234: skin tione are natural..but ist me or what..looks like the skin is not sharp at all

Sharpness is excellent, but DOF is shallow due to F1.4. Look at the hairs on the underlip! C'mon give the Canon engineers a break.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 18:53 UTC
Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »