Six year old cameraSome other bits and pieces
JanMatthys: I have to give props to Sony for pushing the envelope, while Canikon execs are busy pumping out more rethread D-SLR's
Apparently you think Sony's the only company doing R&D!
And what's a Canikon?
pew pew: prob the new RX1 will use this sensor
thx1138: This is interesting, as the Canon lens group has been asking Canon for years to develop a curved sensor to simplify lens design. Another case of woulda coulda shoulda Canon.
Forgive my scepticism, but what is the basis of this claim?
"the Canon lens group has been asking Canon for years to develop a curved sensor to simplify lens design"
"Lenstag maintains a database of a user’s lens, camera body and accessory serial numbers and then trolls the web looking for photos..."
rdscibilia: The opposite of popular is not dull.
Leave it to a PhD candidate to miss the real point.
Did he say that?
forpetessake: This camera needs a bigger sensor with at least 20MP resolution, good interchangeable lenses, they need to do a serious work on the body to make it ergonomic and convenient to use, they also need to add a good EVF and tilting LCD and all other conventional features. Oh, by the way, they can drop that light-field silliness and make use of some good Sony sensor. Then people will probably start buying the camera as long as it's priced competitively.
Actually, Eric, it can be both.
Ulfric M Douglas: Design is cool, reminds me of an early Sony where the body tilted independent of the lens. Was it R1?
If only there was a website dedicated to reviewing digital cameras, where you could find that information...
rfclark: One reason this didn't crash and burn like a lot of our early military test rockets is that this rocket is built with private money!The engineers made sure they knew what they were doing before they lit the fuse!
Or perhaps it didn't crash and burn because of all the early blue-sky experiments and lessons learned on government money?
Menneisyys: I've very thoroughly tested it on my (factory; no rooting) Nexus 7 2013 and found out the following:
- the new panorama support is GREAT, particularly if you enable maximum resolution (the default is high-res). Up until now, Google's implementation was a joke - far-far inferior to either Apple's one on the iPhone 4S+ or Samsung's implementation in their Android handsets. Even Nokia's WP (but not Symbian) implementation has been significantly better.
- blurring worked just GREAT in my tests. While some people did complain about it being slow(ish), I haven't noticed speed problems on my N7, which, while "only" having a 5 Mpixel sensor, has a, compared to the SD800, significantly slower CPU.
What's wrong? Most importantly, all manual modes have been removed, which is a BIG-BIG minus. There's no
- scene selection- manual WB and ISO setting- timer
The first two is particularly painful as, with the new Camera app, you in no way can force the system to shoot at high shutter speeds.
It builds a depth map from multiple images, and applies blur to each pixel in proportion to its longitudinal distance from the focal point. You can dynamically place the focal point anywhere you like in the photo.
km25: They will not review this camera. The Pros that use it could careless. It must just fell great....like my old F2s with Md11 motor drive. It was not only a camera, it was nearly a weapon.
Careless pros use this camera?
ThePhilips: I wonder why there are no tablets with matte screen?
The glare and reflections are really really annoying. After trying several tablets for the casual tasks (web, video) for couple of days, I have simply given up on the whole "tablet" idea.
If you want a matte screen on a tablet then you can buy a matte screen protector.
Timbukto: The sensor is not even the biggest insult. Its the fact that Canon purposely is using this entry level camera to clear out existing inventory of its OLD kit lens when the sharper and far superior AF STM version is already released.
I actually find this more repulsive...nickle and diming the blue collared consumer or starting enthusiast is a bigger offense to me than Nikon milking the old and rich with the DF or 58. Nikon is doing awesome with entry level. The new collapsible kit lens looks almost good enough for the 24MP sensors. The 18-140 super zoom is looking good too, and the sensors and AF on an entire slew of Nikon entry level is now indisputably just better lately.
Insulting? Repulsive? So much emotion over an inanimate object.
You've seen the street price of the 1x00D series, right?
Unleashed! Better watch out.
AbrasiveReducer: I hope Roger will do a dictionary of cliches as well, starting with "built like a tank". Is there any photo equipment that isn't built like a tank? Didn't think so.
I've got a water tank that's made of plastic.
One that really gets me, although it's not exclusively photography related – but which appears quite often on these gear-oriented forums – is "pull the trigger on" in the context of purchasing something. Ugh.
Is it really too difficult to say "buy"?
IchiroCameraGuy: I looked at this Note 3 when picking new phone a few weeks back...didn't seem enough of a difference between this and LG Optimus G Pro for the Sammy to be 3x the price.
If camera quality is at the top of the list then Nokia's best seems the choice.
I didn't expect to have to explain this!
Convert the example to Fahrenheit. Now the comparison is 86°F vs 50°F. Did it suddenly become only 1.72 times as hot? Remember; the conditions haven't changed, only the system of measurement has. Celsius and Fahrenheit are not absolute scales (they are relative; their absolute counterparts are the Kelvin and Rankine scales), and neither are subsidised phone prices.
Three times the price? Surely you jest.
Unless you've been comparing subsidised prices, which is a bit like claiming that 30°C is three times as hot as 10°C.