LKJ

As the only person who seems to misunderstand the definition of the forum, that one flew right over your head.  And now you've gone from rationalising poor decisions to simply arguing for the sake...

And now you're just rationalising. I don't think "selling photographic equipment for profit" is quite what DPReview had in mind when they set up a subforum for professional digital photographers...

It's funny how creationists manage to shoehorn their screwball beliefs into completely unrelated discussions.

Does it bother you?

It's near enough. Have you never heard anyone say "ladies and gentlemen"?  That's what reasonable people say when they intend not to be exclusive.

It is?

What's that got to do with this announcement?

GoPro is?

Right you are bobbarber.

Not quite sure whether many people would care much about "being liked" or "not being an arsehole" in the same circumstance though.

What you're seeing is the "sweet spot" myth exploding.

Not theft; copyright infringement.

How dare the photographer defend her rights!

Anticipating and complaining about something that hasn't even happened yet is a bit funny, but it did. You used the plural form of "troll" though, which I think might be incorrect.

Please don't...

The only person talking about it is you.

Mike: Without telling us what their "slower lens" was it's impossible to tell whether you're making a fair comparison. For example a FF DSLR at ISO 6400 with a 50mm at f2.8 will produce an almost...

That headline should say "Olympus's Toshi Terada". The trailing apostrophe is plural possessive only.

"Applying [...] pricing of 2010 models to 2013 models is a..." standard marketing practice for the company.

It surprises you that people might use cameras to take photographs?

...which won a Shonky award last year.