molnarcs

I have some examples here shot at or over ISO 6400:
http://z7photo.com/2013/04/vol-de-nuit-night-flight-in-saigon/

The girl kissing the dog is ISO 10159, and this is ISO...

I don't get this "problem:"
"Even more confusing - and as we've seen on previous Nikons - is that with Auto ISO disabled, adjusting exposure compensation changes scene brightness in the onscreen...

I haven't noticed any amp glow above ISO 6400 on my d800 (not the E version). I have probably well over a hundred ISO 10159 (Hi .7). Pretty amazing that you can get away with such high ISOs...

I haven't noticed any amp glow above ISO 6400 on my d800 (not the E version). I have probably well over a hundred ISO 10159 (Hi .7) photos. Pretty amazing that you can get away with such high ISOs...

Even the d5100 beats the 600D handily, but only if you shoot RAW. If you shoot JPEGs, the difference would be negligible, and some prefer Canon's JPEG "look" (though you may change the default look...

Nikon's consumer grade lenses tend to be a little bit better than Canon's but the difference is negligible. If you buy the d5200, I'd suggest buy body only and if budget is an issue, go for the...

It depends on what you mean "equal." I don't have the EM-5 but it's worse than my d7000 (albeit slightly, according to reviews I've read, which is pretty damn good for the smaller sensor!). Pixel...

It depends on what you mean "equal." I don't have the EM-5 but it's worse than my d7000 (albeit slightly, according to reviews I've read, which is pretty damn good for the smaller sensor!). Pixel...

It depends on what you mean "equal." I don't have the EM-5 but it's worse than my d7000 (albeit slightly, according to reviews I've read, which is pretty damn good for the smaller sensor!). Pixel...

And the close focusing distance - the Nikon is 1m while the tamron is 1.4 - there are several fields where this matters (in my case, product photography).