papa natas

papa natas

Joined on Oct 31, 2013

Comments

Total: 628, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Yes, we are using technology as a smoke screen. Typical.
I recall when there was only Ham-radio to get in touch with people on the other side of the globe. The level of communication was high and intelligent; they even helped to those in danger and distress where no phone or telegraph was available. Then came CB, and all went to hell.
***Note to newbies:
Ham-radio is not a radio made out of ham.
Leave the cheese and mustard at home.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 21:40 UTC
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Right on!!
It was a pleasure nevertheless, Claudio.
What I regret is that technology leads us to insult people on the other side of the ocean, instead to broad our horizons with new friends who share our same passions.
By the way, I really love your landscapes.
Take care.
Keep on clicking.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 20:07 UTC
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Yeah,
with you we can never pass level one.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 18:15 UTC

Ha!!
Another superb image taken with a 7 years old little GREAT camera!!
This little fellow is cheap in price compared to today's prices. Then again its quality has nothing to be desired from today's standards. There was also a Minolta with the same shape back in the day.
It goes to prove that creativity follows no trendy consumerism.
Kudos to you, bro!!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 18:03 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Hey Carlo,
There's a synonym in Spanish (Central America) for pirla: PIJA.
Have a look.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 16:38 UTC
In reply to:

beetle0042000: Even a 5 yr old iphone shoots better video than the 1700$$ fuji

You took the words out of my mouth, bro.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 15:25 UTC
In reply to:

Calvin Chann: Doesn't bother me nor will it cause me to cancel my order for a X-Pro2. If I want to shoot video, I'll use my RX10II. The X-Pro2 is for stills.

;;;;;;;;;

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 15:24 UTC

Can't beat my Ipod yet.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 15:22 UTC as 43rd comment
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

In a small, Boonie town like Camporosso, where men are men and goats tremble; your town, the only use for paper they know is to wipe the lower ends of their anatomy after a nature call. I guess you read that word, which no body cares about its meaning, just before ripping it out of the dictionary your family was using for such dark purposes. I congratulate you, because that will be the ONLY educational capsule you got yesterday. Go to Ventimiglia, and have a stroll there. They have sidewalks; an unknown concept in your home town.
**Nothern Italian Milanese word for "dickhead".
Being more a joking insult than offensive, "pirla" may be even considered as affectionate among friends
WE ARE NOT FRIENDS, Carlo

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 15:11 UTC
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Dear
SirSeth, As much as I agree with you I'll have to indulge and digress from "breaking the rules" as you point. Nobody breaks rules anymore; they just overstep on them with invented language expressions by formula of using adjective over qualitative. The other day I was so taken aback when I read this sign over a desk: "We do not accept psychological violence" I had to go out and take a fresh glass of dry water.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 02:15 UTC
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Go to school, enroll on a SEMANTICS & GRAMMAR course.
Meanwhile stop vomiting words with no logic or readable meaning.
Or else, have you ever seen those square things with pages inside filled with words in alphabetical order? They are called DICTIONARIES.
Buy or get one.
And when you come back, I still be thinking that cameras can NEVER be sexy or decent.
They are objects.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 02:03 UTC
On photo Symmetry in port in the Symmetry challenge (8 comments in total)

You are a photographer with a painter's soul.
Beautiful!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2016 at 16:08 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Hey...SPEAK WHITE!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 22:22 UTC
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

de·cent
ˈdēs(ə)nt/
adjective
adjective: decent
Conforming with generally accepted standards of respectable or moral behavior.
That's the REAL origin use of this ADJECTIVE, not a QUALITATIVE.
Got it, moron?
Lis et étudies bien ta grammaire, aborton de merde.
Words have NATURE, NURTURE, USE & FUNCTION.
Like your tongue; it has its NATURAL function, but you can USE it for many other things of deviant nature.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 18:18 UTC
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

How about YOU?
You are offensive to my intelligence by not understanding that I was playing and pointing words used, as you say "figuratively" Well, there should be rules to "figuratively" to control the abuse of "figuratively" when giving human qualities to objects. A camera, an Iphone, a car CANNOT be sexy!! Women are sexy, men also. A camera cannot take "decent" pictures, being that a moral standard for human behavior. Do you get it?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 15:06 UTC

Nano scale...
Does it have to do with Nano-Nano, the expression from planet Ork?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 02:33 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

Funny thing:
When people don't agree or understand what I say, they admit their lower intellectual level by calling me weird.
I've been called weird by many like you, "dude"

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 14:14 UTC
On photo Provence in the Landscape Photo with Strong Leadling Lines challenge (13 comments in total)

I could look at this for hours.
Beautiful!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 04:17 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On photo Fog over Sydney Hargour in the Fog challenge (9 comments in total)

Great mastering of lights & shadows.
All the nine zones are there.
Real, pure Black & White.
Well done!!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 04:16 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

MFiftysomething: They played it safe with the design ...spot the difference; effective but not sexy!

The sensor sounds good but the 16:9 lcd and EVF, no touch screen or IBIS makes it look expensive

A dildo is a sexual object.
An inflatable doll is a sexual object.
Sexual toys.
Women are NOT sexual objects.
They are SEXY BEINGS.
You see where we differ?
Objects can be USED in sexual ways.
How many times does one have to zoom in and out the lens before they call the police?
Now, again...How a camera can be SEXY?
By the way, I revised my vocabulary and I'm not being offensive.
I just answer on the level.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 02:55 UTC
Total: 628, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »