Juck

Juck

Joined on Mar 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 301, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ncsakany: Good for him. Lots of sour grapes by wannabe photogs in this thread.

No kidding,,, listen to all these clowns,, like they could do better "if they had the right equipment". lol.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 21:44 UTC
In reply to:

mickcivic: These comments bring to mind my favorite photography joke: "How many photographers does it take to shoot a picture? A thousand: One to shoot the picture, 999 to say 'I could have done it better.'"

Adroitly put.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 21:43 UTC
In reply to:

justinwonnacott: Who bought this? I do not believe this is legitimate, no collector or museum could be six and a half million dollars mis informed. I smell buulshit or an inflated exaggerated public relations story here. The photo is dramatic and unremarkable, maybe it is a deal with ikea for posters?

You're kidding, right?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 21:42 UTC
On Leica M9 users report sensor corrosion issue article (379 comments in total)

I'm not laughing.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2014 at 23:33 UTC as 100th comment | 1 reply
On Sony Alpha 7 II real-world sample gallery posted article (244 comments in total)
In reply to:

worldcup1982: Got to love the same old same old every time a camera is released. How about the cameras expectations? The camera looks at the photos taken by the photographer and says: JEH, WHY WERE YOU WHINNING SO MUCH? go take some photography classes before ever touch me again...

You are a moron.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 03:30 UTC
On Real-world test: Going pro with the Samsung NX1 article (368 comments in total)
In reply to:

Spectro: Cameras tested in Seattle's late fall and winter outdoor are at a disadvantage. The sun just don't shine much, mostly cloudy days. Colors are not going to pop. It doesn't stop from me taking photos in Seattle though.

What a lovely story.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 27, 2014 at 00:25 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

andymuns: All i can say is have look at this.... http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-7D-Mark-II-versus-Pentax-K-3-versus-Nikon-D7100___977_914_865
A $1800 camera should have a better sensor then Canon Eos 7d Mark II has...

Go home. That means less than nothing.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 03:56 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: What an awesome camera, but only for photographers.

Adroitly put.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 03:55 UTC
In reply to:

Rockaw: Good job,Sony. By the time Canikon gets their heads out of the sand, most of the market may have completely moved to Sony, Panasonic, and Olympus.

lol, been hearing that twaddle for 20+ years. Not happening.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 15:59 UTC
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (398 comments in total)

Leica Fanboy nonsense. End.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 06:57 UTC as 103rd comment
On Sea Mirror in the Done With Reflective Surface challenge (9 comments in total)

Remarkable shot considering you were using a manual lens at F/5 ,, I couldn't do that,,, bravo!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 04:06 UTC as 7th comment
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (501 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: She thinks 7D's shutter is loud, but 1Dx's is not? She thinks 7D's high ISO performance is not good enough, how big does she print them? She thinks 7D's AF was slow and cluncky, has she used other APSC sensor bodies? 7D's AF unit was the best and is still one of the best in APSC bodies (bested by MarkII now), though slow and less precise compared to 1D bodies.
She needs to tell her reference point when she says "bad", "slow" or "noisy".
She is a very young pro, I need to wait for others who have been in this sector longer and used 10s of bodies.

@wiggles ,,, Sorry sweetie,,, men are speaking. Just because the High ISO performance sucked less than other APS-C bodies in 2009,, doesn't,,,, mean,,,, it,,,,, didn't,,, still ,,,, suck. Complicated stuff I know.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 07:28 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (501 comments in total)

Lots of pointless debate going on here. If you want to shoot sport on an APS-C body,,, the 7D and now 7D II (and of course their native lenses) are the only players in the game. please,, PLEASE,, someone,, tell me you can shoot a football game better on a A6000 ,,, or some toy Pentax.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 07:06 UTC as 90th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (501 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: She thinks 7D's shutter is loud, but 1Dx's is not? She thinks 7D's high ISO performance is not good enough, how big does she print them? She thinks 7D's AF was slow and cluncky, has she used other APSC sensor bodies? 7D's AF unit was the best and is still one of the best in APSC bodies (bested by MarkII now), though slow and less precise compared to 1D bodies.
She needs to tell her reference point when she says "bad", "slow" or "noisy".
She is a very young pro, I need to wait for others who have been in this sector longer and used 10s of bodies.

Not sure what universe you live in, chunky, but in this one, the 7D's high ISO performance performance was comical,, even in 2009.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 07:02 UTC
On Canon introduces new $78K 50-1000mm cine lens article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

David McGaughey: Yawn. Yet another mediocre variable aperture mega zoom.

McGormless ,,, you actually made me laugh out loud, poor boy.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2014 at 02:46 UTC

Very nice,, let's hope he doesn't end up in an ISIS video.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 13, 2014 at 04:58 UTC as 37th comment | 2 replies
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (340 comments in total)
In reply to:

Juck: The Canon 70-200 F/4 non-IS deserves a mention here,,,, one of the sharpest zooms out there,,, lightweight at 705g and 'only' $700.

LOL

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 05:42 UTC
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (340 comments in total)
In reply to:

Juck: The Canon 70-200 F/4 non-IS deserves a mention here,,,, one of the sharpest zooms out there,,, lightweight at 705g and 'only' $700.

So it doesn't deserve a mensh because you don't have the skills to handle an F4 lens that doesn't have IS? That's pretty funny.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 04:43 UTC
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (340 comments in total)

The Canon 70-200 F/4 non-IS deserves a mention here,,,, one of the sharpest zooms out there,,, lightweight at 705g and 'only' $700.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 19:55 UTC as 23rd comment | 5 replies
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (343 comments in total)
In reply to:

waxwaine: Pentax design and make cameras usually from scratch, for serving the concept of the moment(setup, optic, construction, etc) , while Canon and Nikon must do it based on thrir pro products(d4s, 5Ds) because buyers of their entry level dslrs commonly know nothing or a few of photography, yhen they only know what it´s seen on TV or events. Low canikon models are like new cheap compact Mercedes or BMWs; for people that can ´t afford a real premiun car, but they want one instead Toyota or Nissan offers a better option for the same price.

That's the stupidest thing I've heard all day, and I was just on a NASCAR forum.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 06:53 UTC
Total: 301, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »