Juck: I'm a fan of the M1 & M3,, with all their faults,,,, but this seems like the answer to a question that noone is stupid-enough to ask. Baffling.
What are you babbling about?
I'm a fan of the M1 & M3,, with all their faults,,,, but this seems like the answer to a question that noone is stupid-enough to ask. Baffling.
fnannini: Canon is not only dead, it's been buried too.
lol,, been hearing that twaddle for 30+ years.
mikey fried: Just so happens that I was a 'soccer dad' for the first time at the weekend, using a new FZ1000. This is shot from the touchline, handheld, SOOC. The stabilization, focus speed and tracking were impressive. I also shot some in '4K photo mode' which is effectively 30 frames per second at fast shutter speed with the view to extracting your choice of image afterwards. Amazing. Obviously not up there with pro equipment but I'm sure if I had shot RAW and not been distracted by a 5 year old and puppy at the same time I could have doen a lot better than this!
No offence, but that shot is rubbish.
Nice,, but USB 2?
SETI: Noisy, soft... even my 1st version of OM-D E-M5 produce much better pictures. IMHO
mpgxsvcd: Canon’s new moto:
“Why live in the present when you can live 10 years in the future? We make reality implausible.”
steelhead3: Everyone knows the 7DII has no problems with focusing...just read the Canon Forum
Swing and a miss.
slippedcurve623: Now if Canon updated their 24mm 1.4, 50mm 1.2, 85mm 1.2, and 135mm f2 to the same level as this lens (particularly in the wide open sharpness and CA control) i think canon will have an winner here and might even make some nikon owners swap systems :-)
These Canon lenses are already far superior to their Nikon equivalents. Derrrr.
justmeMN: In 2016, I suspect that we will see, concurrently, a lower-priced M3, and a higher-priced, fuller-featured, M4.
You would be wrong.
Mitch452: This is why the NX1 doesn't sell, and why I returned mine. Samsung tried to go all out with the hardware, but seriously lagged with the software/firmware.
Stabilization for video should have been there from the get-go, along with everything else they neglected to include until years later.
Canons sell for more because their cameras do what they're stated to do out of the box, and very well at that. Same goes for Sony who seems to be doing well with mirrorless.
The h.265 codec was an incredibly stupid move. Neither Handbrake or Samsung's own converter software could get the videos to play back.
Too many software based features still lacking, and bugs left in for it to be considered a professional camera. The automatic mic leveler doesn't even work.
The NX1 seems to take excellent stills, even in auto. But everything else needs work. Another frustration was Apple not supporting NX1 raw files. If they haven't done so yet, who knows if they will.
Lots of desperate, miserable, hapless NX1 owners pimping and putting their insecurities on display as usual. Howaboutraw should be here soon with his usual outrage,, how very dare you criticize this camera! I will agree that the video on this camera is brilliant,, but the stills AF tracking is comical,, even a t2i with 4 fps will give you more keepers in field sports than this turd will at 15 fps.
Cheng Bao: pretty much an every one got a slice award, no big deal.
You didn't get anything, did you? Mouth.
wassim al malak: Except the 1 f/stop light and DoF between f2.8 and f2 , how can that sigma be compared to tamron 15-30 f2.8 vc ?please correct me in my conclusions , if i'm wrong :1- 15 is very wider than 24 .2- 30 is near the 35 .3- VC can help collect light in some cases .4- the main drawback is the instant 1 f/stop and the DoF and the filter thread at the sigma .
The difference is obvious to anyone with eyes. The Tamron is a toy compared to this thing. You need that extra 9mm? Get the Tamron,,, in every other way the Sigma is superior.
Photoman: Wait till the A7RII is reviewed and watch the second hand market get flooded with Canon 5DS cameras...
I like potatoes!
HowaboutRAW: These aren't the strongest aeroplane pics.
That beta 747 is more interesting. Different series.
And number 1 in this series is basically an opening shot from the original version of the TV show "Hawaii 5-O", circa 1968.
lol,, you are a very small, petty man.
Some of the critical comments here are petty, rude and embarrassing. Not one iota of constructive criticism. Get a life.
tko: I have never wanted a Leica, and indeed laughed at the people who own one. This latest incarnation is as ugly as ever. I wonder if Leica even knows there is such a thing a modern CAD software than can actually generate round corners and shapes that are easy to hold. This looks like a lens on a Crackerjack Box and indeed, they've managed to make it look ugly from every angle.
In today's world, the more you make of something, the cheaper it is and the fewer flaws it has. Low production isn't a good thing.
Damn boy, who took the jam out of your donut?
That's a pretty cool camera right there.