I love this!! ,, simply because it makes all you armchair Ansel Adams' so very angry. lol ,, noone is making you use it,,, go home.
John _ Finn: Impressive specs but very few photographers require that level of functionality in a flash unit. I'll stick to YongNuos - they deliver all that I need for a fraction of the cost.
You knew that already, noone else cares.
loitokitok: What some of you guys with your oh so sarcastically crafted comments conveniently seem to forget is that nobody, not even Leica, is forcing you to buy this product. Take it or leave it and move on.
But I certainly applaud them for giving you a subject on which to practice your wit.
So only folk who buy a product are allowed an opinion? You are a tool.
MikeF4Black: So, as I understand, Leica sent over one young high potential, he was given a tour of the factory, skirting the R&D department, and then sent on a bar brawl?
Swing and a miss.
That selfie stick didn't make me want to push them off that cliff at all.
Juck: As someone pointed out on thedigitalpicture site,,, the exif on provided samples pics prove the samples have been extensively, almost comically, photoshopped.
Androole,,, real the exif again nimrod,,, you do know how to read it right?
As someone pointed out on thedigitalpicture site,,, the exif on provided samples pics prove the samples have been extensively, almost comically, photoshopped.
jthommo101: I had this lens but sold it; it was simply not as sharp at 400mm as the venerable 400/5.6. Not up to the mark for serious birding, I'm afraid.
You mean a prime is sharper than a zoom? Whoa,, I need to sit down.
Pritzl: $1100 for an f1.8 telephoto zoom? Seriously? If it's anything like the 18-35 I will be sorely tempted.
Me too,,, that's my new courtside basketball lens right there.
Boss of Sony: Canon 100-400L IS or 400 f5.6L on APS-C would offer same focal length, similar performance for half the price.
100-400L II murders this for sharpness and color if the samples are anything to go on.
aris14: Something tells me that Drone manufacturers will be obliged to integrate in their software in the near future something cute that will make all drone' s data available to ...whom it may concern.
Keep wearing that foil helmet, nutcake.
Juck: I'm a fan of the M1 & M3,, with all their faults,,,, but this seems like the answer to a question that noone is stupid-enough to ask. Baffling.
What are you babbling about?
I'm a fan of the M1 & M3,, with all their faults,,,, but this seems like the answer to a question that noone is stupid-enough to ask. Baffling.
fnannini: Canon is not only dead, it's been buried too.
lol,, been hearing that twaddle for 30+ years.
mikey fried: Just so happens that I was a 'soccer dad' for the first time at the weekend, using a new FZ1000. This is shot from the touchline, handheld, SOOC. The stabilization, focus speed and tracking were impressive. I also shot some in '4K photo mode' which is effectively 30 frames per second at fast shutter speed with the view to extracting your choice of image afterwards. Amazing. Obviously not up there with pro equipment but I'm sure if I had shot RAW and not been distracted by a 5 year old and puppy at the same time I could have doen a lot better than this!
No offence, but that shot is rubbish.
Nice,, but USB 2?
SETI: Noisy, soft... even my 1st version of OM-D E-M5 produce much better pictures. IMHO
mpgxsvcd: Canon’s new moto:
“Why live in the present when you can live 10 years in the future? We make reality implausible.”
steelhead3: Everyone knows the 7DII has no problems with focusing...just read the Canon Forum