Yes the clouds are nice, but I'm not a fan of the composition, and even less of the unrealistic colors and saturation.
Olgierd: These are spectacular! Love the water and amount of detail in the macro shot.
Would you care to share your technique for the last photo (one with starry sky)?
Once again fantastic work.
One more thing: the light on the horizon is light pollution, not - as many believe - the setting sun.
Thank you, Olgierd. The last photo (the ruined building under the Mily Way) was taken with a Tokina 11-16 mm lens. 30 sec exposure, f2.8, ISO 3200, manual focus, and of course careful RAW processing. I lit the foreground by swinging a LED light for a few seconds.
mini23: Come on DPR guys - I'm not a native English speaker but even I know approximately how to use apostrophes - what is sensor's supposed to mean?
...this software modifies the sensor's operation...means as much as...this software modifies the sensor is operation...
In this case,"sensor's" means "of the sensor". mini23, you should learn basic English before erroneously criticizing others. (Also, what you propose - "this software modifies the sensor is operation" - is totally gibberish.)
Than again, having looked at this image some more, I have to say that these phone photos are good for screen viewing only. The lack of detail makes this one look painting-like.
Beautiful! Indeed, good timing and location matter much-much more than the camera.
Thank you, Simon. Unfortunately no-one seems to read these user-created articles...
Small point: the title is wrong.
"Sigma to start shipping USB dock IN May"or"Sigma to ship USB dock FROM May"
marike6: When shooting "minutes from your home" means dramatic cliffs in Loop Head, Ireland, then yes, I suppose you don't need to travel to far and exotic lands for find interesting subjects. If you live near the Long Island Sound in NY, or some New England town, say New London, CT, I'd say the work of making compelling landscapes "in your own backyard" gets dramatically more difficult.
Where the author lives looks like paradise for a landscape photographer, you could literally shoot the same scene in different seasons, with different light, treatments, and focal lengths, and you'd never run out compelling things to shoot.
Beautiful images, and interesting article. Bravo, and thanks very much.
Again: are you sure that there are no great landscape photo opportunities within, say, 50 miles of a New England town? Places you can get to within an hour by car?
nawknai: This is like a rich guy suggesting that poor people just earn more money.
I grew up in the 'burbs.
I live in the city now, so I can try some street photography, but landscape photography is on hold until my next vacation.
I disagree. I live in a city (Budapest). But if you can afford a car and a few hours' traveling, you can take photos like the following. These are all within 100 km of Budapest. You just have to take some time and effort to explore your region. You can even do that on the Internet (photo communities help). And online weather reports help a lot. My photos below may not be great but they illustrate my point.http://www.pbase.com/laja30/image/148132528http://www.pbase.com/laja30/image/148228766http://www.pbase.com/laja30/image/148093772
To me, this is the best of the challenge. I love the simple composition coupled with the dramatic clouds. Congratulations.
cosmo13: So where is the mast with the camera? I see nothing attached to the Rover extending out of the frame to the camera position. In other words there is nothing going from where the camera must be to the Rover.
Exactly. What connected the camera with the rover? How was this taken?
I think this is Photoshop work. Neither the tongue nor the insect would be this sharp at 1/125 sec.
Let's face it> most panorma photos are boring. But this... this is a different world altogether. Incredible perspective, colours, composition. Congratulations.
This took my breath away at first, but after a better look, it's clear that this is Photoshop work. Both the lightning and the unmoving clouds - as noted by another commenter.
Baah, sorry but this is horrible. I don't know what you did to that photo but the terrible noise makes it look as it was taken with a compact camera. After some simple post-processing, my 7D produces better night images.
645D: Nikon is kicking Canon's butt in all directions:-) Keep going, Nikon!!!
I don't know what you mean. Look at the blue clock in the lower right corner. Both at 1600 and 3200, the Canon 600D image is much cleaner, and at least as detailed.
Most of you seem spoiled brats to me. You have no idea how lucky you are if you can even consider buying such a camera, whether by Nikor or Canon. A very small percentage of the world's enthusiast photographers can afford to dish out three thousand dollars for a camera body only, plus at least as much for good lenses. Be grateful for your good fortune - it may not last forever.
Yes you captured a great moment, but the lack of detail and sharpness makes this photo good for web viewing only.