montoniphotography: what Zack make is documentary and cityscape, but not street photography.
If you mean with street the "I have big balls and hold someone my camera in his face eric kim style", then you are right. that stuff is much better.but I would like to know your difference between documentary in the streets and street photography too
one good so,ution to start with, is to. uy a profile for yoir camera! cost you about 10 bucks and the results are great
tecnoworld: Very nice bokeh and nice IQ. But I still prefer my 85mm f1.4 as a focal lenght on APS-C. Of course this 56mm is smaller, which is nice on mirrorless cams.
in fact, the 56 mm lense is not smaller or significant smaller than the 85 f1.8 what would give a similar picture. it might be a nice lense, but with all these super fast lenses, we are facing very heavy and pricy lenses. finally we end ob with the same size like a dslr in worst case, but for a much higher price
Retzius: The sensor in the Leica T is the same sensor that was in the Leica X-Vario which is the same sensor that was in the Leica X2
now THATS innovation... er, I mean, the "essence of photography"
revenant, you are explaining every new camera. for that you don't have to buy that one
Graham Gibson: So many haters here who bash this thing purely on cost. I wonder how many of them paid a premium for an Apple computer or iPhone over some cheaper alternative? I don't see much difference. Surely there's some level of enjoyment to be had from the design and ergonomics.
compare the apple user with the m240 users, that would be right. but that thing is a joke
ambercool: I might have to get this new iCamera!
howaboutraw, of course it has a touch screen!
jnd: Only USB 2.0, 1/4000, 1/180 flash sync, 30fps video, too large, small grip, not full frame, only 16Mpix, and of course, too expensive!
What did I miss, guys? :)
who cares about USB, I have never used the USB connection. just buy a card reader, done!
HeyItsJoel: Question about Fuji lenses:
1. Is the Fuji 56mm f/1.2 a REAL "f/1.2" in comparison to their FF lens counterpart (i.e.: Canon 50mm f1.2)? I mean, does it give the same effects a typical f/1.2 lens would give like a dreamy bokeh, shallow DOF, etc...
2. Is the 23mm f/1.4 a REAL "f/1.4"?
I'm inquiring because Fuji is asking a premium price for those lenses and I'll glad pay it, if the playing fields are equal.
of course is the lense a f1.2 or f1.4 whatever lense you are talking about. and in most cases the bokeh is quite good. regarding the dof, learn the differences in sensor size and you can answer your question on yoir own. f stop is alsway fstop but will not give you thes ame dof on different sensor sizes!
I follow her for years on tumblr and I really love her work
Terry Breedlove: Fuji nor Sony have anything even close to this.
that is the reason why I bought a sony and would buy a fuji but would neber buy this nikon. because nikon has nothing like fuji and sony!
RichRMA: Isn't time for USB-3 to make it at least to the pro camera ranks?
who cares about usb? I use dlsr since 2001 and I always used a card reader. so I don't care about any usb protocol in a camera.
I have a problem with that application, the results are looking very crappy
Nukunukoo: Df does show marginally better noise performance at the upper ISOs, especially when compared to the D610. No real advantage though, except for legacy lens and those who love lotsa knobs.
did you scale down the otheresults to 16 mpix?
the problem I habe with PN is the color. with capture one the colors does look much better
Paco 316: This camera has better IQ than the Original 5D. ISO 25600 cleans up pretty well with the black slider in Lightroom 4. Good for small print and web viewing.
I don't expect good high ISO, I already KNOW this camera delivers at high ISO, thank you very much.
I saw the same in a comparison with m 5D files. And everybody is happy with the results from my 5D, so the omd should do it's job fine