the-dude-75

the problem I habe with PN is the color. with capture one the colors does look much better

I used FF for a long time, as Aps-c and now mft. nobody can tell which camera I used by watching my pictures! if you mean with 3D the difference in DOF, then yes you are right, but then we talk...

great pictures and great colors, what is your way of PP?

the colors in your example are far off from reality. so amazing colors?? where are they?

sorry, you have no clue what you are talking about these photos could have been done with any camera, even with the worse AF

For 149$ that is not really a question, of course ii is worth. It works great together with Aperture, I like it, espacially for that amount of money  http://www.eike-loge.com/category/blog/

the thread opener was talking about a 550d and cheap optics, that is a complete other story than a 6d with a 50 mm  1.2 lense.  and a 550d with a 50 mm 1.4 will not give you any advantages in case...

why should I want huge SLR lenses on a csc? that does not make sense at all

yes, no problem!

I'm now for 1 year in the mft range, coming from FF canon systems. And I have to say, I still love it. I do everything with OM-D now, from weddings to concerts. Also in lowlight situations like...

very well done, but it is not the camera that did these great pictures

you want a retro looking camera, take the om-d and not the gh3.

inside the EU he doesn't have to deal,with custom, just buying in germany is finebut I see no problems getting these lenses in austria too, amazon has the 45 one in stock

Great picture, I would crop the dark part then it would be imho better