supeyugin1

supeyugin1

Lives in United States Santa Clara, CA, United States
Joined on Mar 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 251, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (188 comments in total)

The smartphones are moving to the right direction I think, with such phones like Galaxy Note 4, S6, K zoom, LG G4, HTC One M9, and CM1.
CM1 seems to be a good phone, but some things I don't like:
1. 28mm equivalent lens is too wide.
2. non-removable battery
3. no OIS
4. no Xenon flash
5. 1" sensor is too big for a phone.
Ideally I'd like to have a phone as follows:
1. 1/1.7" - 2/3" sensor size
2. 30-35mm fixed focal f/2.0 or faster lens, or 24-1XX zoom similar to the ones on Canon S120 or Fuji XQ2.
3. Xenon flash
4. OIS
5. removable battery.

I currently own Samsung Galaxy K zoom and I'm very pleased with it, the quality of the photos is much better than my previous phone Galaxy Note 3, which was not bad as well, but the sensor size is a bit small at 1/2.3", and the zoom is bit too long (24-240mm). All other features are present on this phone. I hope that the next iteration will reach my expectations.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2015 at 05:48 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (188 comments in total)
In reply to:

seeblue: Although I often find a good smartphone to be a great substitute for a camera, I doubt this good camera makes a great substitute for a smartphone.

For the size and battery-life alone, I wager NO ONE will (or will manage to) use this as their single smartphone. Thus the single device argument falls flat. This is a large sensor compact camera trying to look and act like a smartphone. In the end, it’s an expensive, moderately powered device, with average handling and speed, designed for a handful of pixel-peeping RAW and resolution enthusiasts.

The smartphone which will come closest to conquering photography will come from Apple or Samsung; not from a camera maker. Apparently they’re taking their time. In a few years we’ll look back at the CM1 as a kludge.

I use Galaxy K zoom as my only smartphone, and I'm pretty happy with it. I has OIS, removable battery, xenon flash, and 24-240 zoom lens, which is pretty good for a phone. The only downsize is that the sensor size is a bit small at 1/2.3", which is not bad compared to other smartphones, but I'd prefer 1/1.7" or larger. I don't think that I'd like to have more that 2/3" sensor size on a phone.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2015 at 04:51 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Sony is a good sensor manufacturer, they should stick with it, and exit camera and lens manufacturing, as they are not good at it. They already ruined all the Minolta stuff they bought. Their lenses are only good for smartphones, they should stick with this market.

I was talking about 06 lens, not 07, and about RX100 mkI.

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 05:53 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Sony is a good sensor manufacturer, they should stick with it, and exit camera and lens manufacturing, as they are not good at it. They already ruined all the Minolta stuff they bought. Their lenses are only good for smartphones, they should stick with this market.

Q7 is much better than RX100 past 70mm with 06 lens, not to mention that Pentax ergonomics is superior to any other camera I tried so far. Sony sucks in this respect and by far.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 07:14 UTC
In reply to:

Iuri Cezar: I would like to see another approaching ... like a LX200, a GH5 or a FZ2000 making/receiving calls !

Not very long ago, smartphones had a less than 3" screen. My first smartphone had a 2.8" screen, and I was happy.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 05:56 UTC
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: Beautiful images from the DPR team!!!

I would have to get into it further, but I think this camera is perfect for people like me who need to post high-quality images to social media outlets during events and conferences where wi-fi is either non-existent or prohibitively expensive (such as at big business hotels where it can be a few hundred dollars a day for high-speed access).

For instance, I was shooting an event last week and the client wanted me to post photos to Facebook right then but no wi-fi for miles. So I put away my D810, f/1.4 lenses and speedlights and shot with my iPhone. She was overjoyed with the results because I was able to post a small gallery on Facebook via LTE within a couple of minutes.

So before you get too critical of this camera, remember that a lot of people make their living doing social media and this seems like a great tool for those people.

Why don't you take G4 enabled camera with you, like Samsung Galaxy NX, or Wifi enabled camera + use your cell as a hotspot?

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 05:53 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Sony is a good sensor manufacturer, they should stick with it, and exit camera and lens manufacturing, as they are not good at it. They already ruined all the Minolta stuff they bought. Their lenses are only good for smartphones, they should stick with this market.

I never tried A7 and will never try, I don't need FF, APS-C is good enough. I don't have any legacy lenses.
Sony lenses are only good if they have CZ lable on them, but then the price goes up significantly. The rest of Sony lenses are either made by Tamron, or Minolta legacy designs.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 14:44 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Sony is a good sensor manufacturer, they should stick with it, and exit camera and lens manufacturing, as they are not good at it. They already ruined all the Minolta stuff they bought. Their lenses are only good for smartphones, they should stick with this market.

Bwahahaha! I own Sony RX100, but I prefer using Pentax Q7 instead of Sony. It's so much more fun!

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 04:47 UTC

Sony is a good sensor manufacturer, they should stick with it, and exit camera and lens manufacturing, as they are not good at it. They already ruined all the Minolta stuff they bought. Their lenses are only good for smartphones, they should stick with this market.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 04:28 UTC as 12th comment | 12 replies
On LG G4 puts focus on the camera post (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

SergioBR: Ok , let´s wait the next Samsung Galaxy K Zoom (Hope 1' sensor, RAW mode etc). Nice job LG ! All the cameraphones must show their weapons now !

I just got K zoom recently, and it clearly beats my previous phone (Note 3). On the other hand there is a similar to G4 phone from Samsung, which is Note 4. The lens is a bit slower than G4, but it has removable battery and SD slot as well.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 03:36 UTC
On LG G4 puts focus on the camera post (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photato: This G4 can easily be one of the best Smartphone Camera currently. It Checks all the Specs that a Pro or Enthusiast photographer may want.
Apparently it has the same Sony Sensor as the Galaxy S6 but with an even larger Aperture at f1.8 and better 3 Axis OIS (the S6 has two)
But probably a more important Spec is the dedicated WB sensor which helps with great accurate color, something that can be seen at any image size.
The Quantum Display with its Wide Gamut and high resolution rounds the whole package.
I don't care about the Leather Cover though, it looks tacky and ultimately doesn't protect the Screen, I'd rather get the Plastic version and cover it with a protective TPU case that wraps the Screen Bezel.
Oh and Removable Battery and SD card !
I don't think there is nothing LG left out here.
If so I'd like to know :)
I hope the DPR staff here can see the value of this and make a review of this tech marvel.

I think the best smartphone camera is still Samsung Galaxy K zoom. I just got one few days ago, and so far it's the best camera on a phone I ever had, my previous phone is Note 3, which had a pretty decent camera, but not up to K zoom standards.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2015 at 21:50 UTC
On Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 article (441 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Alison should take care of her nail polish, it's peeling off!

Yeah, I'm wondering what's gonna come after peeling nail polish? I'm scared!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 21:47 UTC
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (340 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: You also forgot Pentax Q 15-45/2.8, it's an equivalent of 69-207 on Pentax Q7. The weight is 90g/3.17oz and the length is 56mm. The quality is excellent, and the price is only $300. I've got it as a part of a bundle, so it's cost was $200 for me.

There is Blur Control feature on Q-series cameras. Achieves similar effect, and it's really cool.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 19:28 UTC
On Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 article (441 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Alison should take care of her nail polish, it's peeling off!

It looks unprofessional for the DPR staff.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 17:02 UTC
In reply to:

nir-vana: A journalist should ask the tough questions and not just let Canon representative make an online advertisement. The man talks extensively about video but the changes are minor, late and not substantial. No articulated screen, no 4K, low end 4:2:0, no focus peaking, no advanced codec, no WiFi, no touch focus, no word about full sensor readout or line skipping. All of that make it inferior to the latest MILCs of Panasonic, Sony and other mirrorless brands, or even to Panasonic latest compacts.
It seems like Canon still believe that their only rival is Nikon.

Why do insist on DSLR? DSLR is passe. You can't shoot good video with DSLR. DSLR is lagging behind. Yes, if you sleep five years, you will die. Try not to work for 5 years, then come back to market and try to find a job. Good luck.
Yes, Samsung has some quality glass on par with Canon's L glass.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 17:00 UTC
On Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 article (441 comments in total)

Alison should take care of her nail polish, it's peeling off!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 02:48 UTC as 30th comment | 5 replies
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (340 comments in total)

You also forgot Pentax Q 15-45/2.8, it's an equivalent of 69-207 on Pentax Q7. The weight is 90g/3.17oz and the length is 56mm. The quality is excellent, and the price is only $300. I've got it as a part of a bundle, so it's cost was $200 for me.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 23:52 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
On Canon PowerShot G7 X First Impressions Review preview (947 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: A new king of pocketable compacts! Canon finally dethroned Sony. And it's cheaper too! Good job, Canon.

Well, at least Canon doesn't need to stick Zeiss or Leica name on their lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 23:15 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G7 X First Impressions Review preview (947 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: A new king of pocketable compacts! Canon finally dethroned Sony. And it's cheaper too! Good job, Canon.

I have mkI, and I wouldn't say it's exceptional up to Zeiss standards.
I also have an R1 with "Zeiss", which is good, but not exceptional.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 18:36 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G7 X First Impressions Review preview (947 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: A new king of pocketable compacts! Canon finally dethroned Sony. And it's cheaper too! Good job, Canon.

Zeiss just sticks their name on those. As well as Leica-Panasonic.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 23:16 UTC
Total: 251, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »