Sothoth

Sothoth

Joined on Nov 24, 2012

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4

So the take home message is that you shouldn't put a filter on a lens that protrudes without checking for proper clearance?. Isn't that obvious? And who among us isn't aware that the tolerance on lens filters for distance from filter glass to thread isn't consistent among filter manufacturers and isn't therefore something you should make assumptions about when deciding if the lens and filter will contact when putting it on? Sounds to me like the guy who wrote the article has his ignorance to blame and not Canon or whomever made the filter.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2013 at 08:00 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On DPReview Recommends: Top 5 Compact Cameras article (554 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sothoth: This is a horrible review. A $249-649 price range? All shoot RAW but one? The FZ200 is a "compact?" Where is the LX7, S100, and a few others? Where are the image samples? I think this is a waste.

Hmm. Not sure stating an opinion on a forum makes anyone a troll, but I certainly respect opinions contrary to my own. It's indeed my opinion that this "round up" leaves a lot to be desired. Regardless of the classification of a camera as "compact" it seems hard to imagine most users thinking of that one as compact. Also, stating in the text why you are comparing things with such a wide range of price and functionality doesn't get anyone off the hook for a bad round up, it makes we wish they had gone into more depth for each category. It's my strong and humble opinion that the round up is fairly useless to me.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 25, 2012 at 17:21 UTC
On DPReview Recommends: Top 5 Compact Cameras article (554 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sothoth: This is a horrible review. A $249-649 price range? All shoot RAW but one? The FZ200 is a "compact?" Where is the LX7, S100, and a few others? Where are the image samples? I think this is a waste.

@Neo, I'm not sure I get your point.
@Kerry - I didn't dismiss it. I looked at all the cameras they recommend and researched them a bit. Nothing wrong with any of them but surely not fitting of DPRs usual high standards.

If it were me I'd divide the review into three categories to compare the compact zoom in the $300 price range separate from the high end compacts that shoot raw and have reasonably good optics (G15, LX7, etc) and had a category for fixed lens that aren't so compact. I'd have shown sample images and compared ergonomics and controls, and described what it's like to use each for a week or two, rather than superficial "here's the best" when the pool is too broad to really be useful as a comparison.

Just seems lacking to me.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 25, 2012 at 05:40 UTC
On DPReview Recommends: Top 5 Compact Cameras article (554 comments in total)

This is a horrible review. A $249-649 price range? All shoot RAW but one? The FZ200 is a "compact?" Where is the LX7, S100, and a few others? Where are the image samples? I think this is a waste.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2012 at 23:48 UTC as 94th comment | 9 replies
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4