peckinpah: Good to see Fuji is still updating the X-Pro1. But why no Classic Chrome for us?
Aha. That makes sense. Thanks.
Good to see Fuji is still updating the X-Pro1. But why no Classic Chrome for us?
Dimitris Servis: 1. It says "Submit photos by end of day Friday 11/7 please"2. It seems it is only for Ozyxy
1. I'm in Europe, DPreview is probably asleep now. They'll fix it.2. :-)
I wonder if Paul's Boutique's still there
Duncan Dimanche: You know the fuji sensors are nice in low light but they are never sharp. Even the RAWs are being stripped off noise in order to create an illusion of amazing high ISO performance... it does remind me of Sony's JPGs
It would be nice if those samples shot would be in RAW... But I know that there is little difference in Fuji's raw and JPGs...
I'm trying to like Fuji but I really can't...just look at that girl's portrait... there seems to be not much details....
Cheers and thanks for posting those
Have you used, for instance, a X-Pro1 yourself? How are Fuji sensors never sharp?
calking: Can't wait to hear what all the x-trans sensor haters have to say if/when the BAYER sensor XA-1 comes out at an even lower price than the XM-1.
Oh wait...never mind.
"no VF ... Waaah!!!""Has plastic parts ... Waaah!!!""Should be cheaper ... Waaah!!!""Made in ... [not Japan] ... Waaah!!!""It's not full frame ... Waaah!!!""no good for shooting sports ... Waaah!!!""It's not a ... [Sony, Oly, Nikon, Canon, Pany, Leica, etc] ... Waaah!!!""no way to convert RAW files (total horsesh*t) ... Waaah!!!""I don't like the colors ... Waaah!!!""Fuji is REALLY going out of business NOW ... Waaah!!!""It's not a FF Sony Nex ... Waaah!!!""I see artifacts at 400x magnification on my electron microscope ... Waaah!!!""It's too big. Too small. Too complex for the blind... Waaah!!!""No in-camera stabilization ... Waaah!!!""Video isn't as good as ..... Waaah!!!""Image quality not as good as full frame Canon 5DM3 / Nikon D800 with prime lenses ... Waaah!!!""just wait for the XMA2s model..."
Yep that's funny. And true :-)