Devendra

Devendra

Lives in United States AK, United States
Works as a Engineer (SW)
Has a website at http://127.0.0.1
Joined on Jun 23, 2004
About me: View

Comments

Total: 51, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

chlamchowder: The Nikon AF-S 200-400/4 VR II is $6750, and the TC-14E is $500. Together, they would cost $7520.
So, the question is, is the convenience of having the teleconverter built in worth $4480?

a $2.99 ikea umbrella does a great job if there is ever a need to change the lens in rain/snow.
also, why will there ever be a need to change the lens in snow/rain when there is absolutely no improvement in image quality when things are barely visible anyway? as usual some people will make any excuse to justify canon's most absurd design.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 14:25:25 UTC
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: How can I edit my polar bear shots taken in North Pole?

i will be more worried about battery life rather than internet connectivity :/

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 06:11:46 UTC

well, if adobe raw is decent in future adobe elements 14+ (currently @11?), and my nik and topaz plugins are also usable in elements, i don't mind adobe's new move. after all i barely use even 5% of adobe's cs5's full capability, plus elements keeps advancing.

good move for the future adobe.. just a bit too early. im sure people will calm down once they see the value of cloud/subscription 2-3yrs down. with gigs of storage space becoming popular online, it will be a relief of sorts

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 04:38:32 UTC as 425th comment
In reply to:

gl2k: With regard to D800 vs D800E this is hilarious !!
Nice evidence that D800E is the ultimate rip-off for would-be pros. Much reminds me of "Emperors New Clothes".

With stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain.

what bout moire lucas? since you are hell bent on fabric etc, you do know that most medium format cameras do not have AA built in either, yet they are heavily used for indoor fashion photography. by the way there are a million tricks out there in the open on how to remove them - if they ever show up in 0.001% of your shots.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2013 at 15:17:27 UTC
In reply to:

Paul Farace: Nikon made fire control optics for the Imperial Japanese Navy in WWII !!! They were intended to kill my father, my uncles, my cousins, and my neighbors and friends!!!! Yet I don't bear them ill will as a result. The policitally correct (self absorbed) wackos need to get a life... hunting scopes are a fact of life. I don't like hunting... so I don't go hunting! Problem is these leftists and nanny-staters want to IMPOSE their will on EVERYONE!

leave it to a canonite to find problems with any nikon equipment.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2013 at 22:08:25 UTC

this is a steal if true.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 15:23:59 UTC as 102nd comment

hybrid pdaf seems like a good way to go for future ff/fx, but useless in aps-c/dx mode since the af points pretty much cover everything in high af point models?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 05:46:58 UTC as 50th comment
On Photographer's copyright suit lists his subject as defendant news story (101 comments in total)

too bad about the photographer.. but maybe there is a reason why some artists become popular after they die? :)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2013 at 22:31:57 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

expressivecanvas: This looks horrendous... of course, the "Current" imager example looks horrendous too but on the opposite extreme. This is worthy of publishing in DPReview? Gimme a break!

lots of things look horrendous when starting.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2013 at 14:14:02 UTC
On Nikon posts sample images from new D7100 news story (95 comments in total)

nice details

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2013 at 01:39:56 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: This is like 300 hp in Geo Metro...who really needs it? When you people realize it won't make you a better photographer?

looks like you automatically disqualified yourself?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 18:54:25 UTC
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: When can we have a FF body at the price of the D7100.......

tomorrow ! :)
mark my words - just write it on the wall as a reminder!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 06:00:05 UTC
In reply to:

The A-Team: Glad I can get the Canon 17-40L (wider, longer, and faster, better built) for the same price :)

canon trolls supporting each other

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 00:52:24 UTC

time to sell my sigma 300-800mm f5.6 and get this.. not!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 04:30:25 UTC as 43rd comment
On Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional WiFi news story (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Barry Fitzgerald: It's basically a warmed over D5100 which has a poor 0.78x viewfinder, no Auto FP, no wireless flash, no DOF preview. They shoved the questionable AF system from the D7k in there (how you fit 39 dots in a tiny viewfinder is going to be fun) and a 24mp sensor and beefed up the fps a little.

Still no hard buttons for ISO and WB..shame Nikon are really lagging on basic functionality.

Barry, it sounds like a great opportunity for you to manufacture a camera that will make a lot of people happy.. you think

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 14:35:14 UTC
On Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional WiFi news story (392 comments in total)

I loved my D5000 as a backup to my D300. Often time it was the go-to camera for trips and it never failed to disappoint. Worked consistently well despite being refurbished.
The swivel screen is perfect for composing shots and doing the video from unconventional angle.
I sold off both and have a D800E now. This lil camera might be my replacement instead of the D300/D7000 hybrid. Will wait for the hybrid specs to come out before get this one. But either one of them will certainly be my backup camera!

Once again.. GOOD JOB NIKON! Giving spot metering at all AF points, large bracketing D7000 AF etc in a small affordable bundle!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 14:32:43 UTC as 64th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional WiFi news story (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

boulderdashcci: Funny that Nikon's highest end camera from this generation has the lowest megapixel count.

a typical canon user response. you do know that it has more af points than 7d and also 6d, apart from spot metering on all af points, etc etc.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 05:12:05 UTC
On Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional WiFi news story (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

JonSr: D5100 was a D7000 with a few flaw. D5200 sounds like D3200 with a new number. Doesn't sound like an upgrade but a downgrade. That's sad.

JonSr. yes its not for you. you can go back to your cave

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 05:10:02 UTC
In reply to:

Retzius: This doesnt make sense

NIkon - "The 1 system is not a pro camera, it wasnt our goal. Its just a fast high quality point and shoot"

DP - "what is the P7700 for then?"

Nikon - "Its a second camera for pros to scout a location that want manual controls."

DP - "it would be nice if the V1 had that."

Nikon - "It does. We have pros using it for motocross even. You just click it and it always get it"

DP - "really, cuz the focus sucks in low light"

Nikon - "exactly, it has room to improve."

wait huh? this guy has more doublespeak than Orwell's 1984.

just because it is not a pro camera does not mean pro's cannot use it? That is flawed reasoning. In fact the explanation is simple that it is even used by pros to show that it is capable of certain type of photography, while still having some drawbacks.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2012 at 21:52:17 UTC
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Dirk Jasper of Nikon article (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shamael: what makes me laugh is this eternal affordable camera stuff. Even at 1500$ it is only affordable to those who have the money. You can sell anything at any price if you find a sucker who pays that.

Is it not time to speak about a cheaper FX camera, not an affordable one. We are far away form a budget pricing anyway. If you consider that a D600 is a D7000 with FX sensor and that it's development and production costs not more than the first, the price is much too high anyway. All that prices are scaled in a way to protect other models of the brand, but not with any affordable or budget for anyone in view.

Shameel,
Please go ahead and create a sub 500$ FX model in todays market. Make it perform like a D600 and then sell boatloads of it. Whats stopping you from doing that? If you cannot answer that then let people buy what they are prepared to pay for.
Other than that it is just whining.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2012 at 04:02:17 UTC
Total: 51, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »