I am not sure I would buy anything with a prominent Lowepro logo on the front. Visible as a camera bag about a hundred yards away. F.
This will be a good lens, although I will get the PL 1.4 What I would like to see is a Panasonic 17.5 1.7, or a 12mm 1.7.F.
FrankS009: Is this camera as good as a Panasonic G7? The latter is not mentioned in the review. Not a "peer" like the Sony or Fuji mirrorless cameras mentioned? Same price.F.
You are right. I think they have edited the review.F.
Is this camera as good as a Panasonic G7? The latter is not mentioned in the review. Not a "peer" like the Sony or Fuji mirrorless cameras mentioned? Same price.F.
Very difficult to draw conclusions - so many variables, including raw converter, lenses used, not to mention eyesight, etc. But so many dramatic judgments and strong statements by opinionated readers. I find the comments more "interesting" than the images.
Looks like a nice bag but expensive. I would rather buy a lens.
FrankS009: Not as heavy as I had feared - 474g.
You are right.F.
Not as heavy as I had feared - 474g.
The RX100 is not that light. It is heavier than a Panasonic GM1 with a 12-32mm lens (and a much bigger sensor) , and only 100g less than a GX7.
Right. Am off to buy a lottery ticket.
Diogo Lopes: DSC-RX100 II - $599DxO ONE - $599
Iphone6 (129 g) + DxO ONE(108g) = 237g (in your hand)DSC-RX100 II - 281g (1 hand operation)
Cost to fix broken lightning connector (on the camera and/or phone) ????
Cost to add an adapter when Apple change its mind??
No thanks...Flop of the year!
*it's funny how DP tried hard...
You have to add the cost of the iPhone to the DxO 1 if you want the combination.
Forgive me if I have repeated a preceding post. This might be an interesting product, but only for those who have Apple phones etc.
A lovely camera but not light. Still, a lens is included in the weight. I guess it depends how often one shoots at 28mm.F.
Another camera body to have to carry in my bag, along with the colour version. F.
ddtwenty: So much anticipation for in-body imagestabilizaer.
You would think from some comments that Panasonic cameras have no stabilization at all. Its in the lenses. F.
FrankS009: Hope to purchase this camera in the next year. What is not to like?
How does it fit in the hand?
Their preview was cryptic to say the least. They describe the grip as "weird" whatever that means. I too am looking forward to trying it.
Hope to purchase this camera in the next year. What is not to like?
In terms of "convergence" I don't see how this is a more revolutionary product than the Panasonic GH4. And the GH4 shoots RAW still images, and still image can be produced from its 4K footage.
Is it the shape that says convergence to the author?
I would hate to have to the journalist who has to lug 2 lbs around to every event.
Is it the best bang for the buck for companies? We shall see it if sells.
regordyoll: Why a 1" sensor when a Sony A7 has a full frame sensor or a Sony A6000 has an APS-C sensor? I'd like to understand the reason. Thanks!
The GH$ has a larger sensor and is much lighter.F.
I would buy this camera in a minute if I could afford it. Not cheap in Canada.F.