Great summary. Can't wait to see the next 59Mpx from Sony.
DVT80111: Sorry for my ignorant. How does it work at slow speed? Do I have to wait for the camera to finish 4 pictures? What if the object is moving? So will I get a noiseless picture, but blurry image?
Samsung has started producing stacked memory using TSV. It is coming. They may pull it in to stay ahead of the competition. Sony may do same. For small sensor farms like Cannon, this technology will break their business be sure TSV equipment are not cheap.
Mirrorless keeps advancing every year while DSLR is a sitting duck.
Buy it before Sony kill it with a RX-10 Martk II
Bigger sensor = need more light = larger hole.
If you ask for a FF, then don't complain of big ars lenses. Otherwise, stay with APSC.
Hope Trey Ratcliff will ever come back to the 50Mpx FF...hope hope.
No surprise. When I see A6000 has more advanced capabiliy than A7, I know a refresh is coming.
7 axis stabization system coming soon.
Seen nothing good yet, or I need new glass..
Hope they will make one for Fujifilm. They have the same lens wiggling problem.
Wow, 3rd generation already and there is still no direct competition from any OEM. What is the Sony secret sauce or.. patent?
Yarnim: Somewhat late to the party I guess, but guys, a question from a relative newbie.
Just ordered A6000 so waiting for it in the mail, but would it make sense at all to get this and the B&H Zeiss 12&32 lens combo?
One of the strongest aspects of the A6000 is its amazing focus speed, but apparently, neither of those lenses even offer PDAF and their focus mechanism kinda sux with a huge, unpleasant focusing motor noise and slow focusing.
I do get that their optics are pretty good, but not much ahead compared to Sony's SEL1018 for the 12mm zeiss, and the 32mm not very much compared to sigma 30mm.
Any thoughts, advises? TIA!
Does lens have anything to do with PDAF?
What happened? Samsung couldn't copy Sony RX100.
This kind of news made the DSLR like a dinosaur.
ISO 409600 -the ISO scale is way out of date. Next ISO, million, LOL
Zeisschen: It's quite sad to see that many readers here have obviously no idea of what quality Zeiss lenses are in the past and today. I don't know how Zeiss got the reputation for so people to sell (summarized) "fugly overprized German crap", when pretty much the opposite is the truth. These comments can only come from people who never used ANY Zeiss product.I for myself chose the Sony Alpha System ONLY for the ability to use Zeiss autofocus lenses! I'm aware that non of their lenses are "cheap", but for the performance I get I'm always satisfied and I never felt I had been tricked by them and paid too much. All of their lenses are designed to be used wide open and to deliver outstanding contrast and color, not seen in any other lenses you can buy for money today. Every single lens they make has that state of the art performance that we are always asking for, unbelievable how people ignore can ignore that by just looking at a product picture and some numbers.
Zeiss T* 180/2.8 was a horrible lens too. I had to return.
Retro-styling - a sign of a technology in stagnation.
1 of 4 Nexus 5 that I ordered has been shipped.
For just over 50% the price of an iFony 5S, it is a no brainer.
HappyVan: "In what may end up being a more infuriating than entertaining attempt at appealing to photographers, Google has released a video of people using their Nexus 5 smartphones to capture weddings. Since smartphones seem to be the #1 enemy of professional wedding photographers, we thought this was a funny choice for a promotional video."
Actually, this is wrong. Pro wedding photog don't fear smartphones.
Pro wedding photog provide value in a package. Pictures are nicely presented. Video is smartly edited and audio mixed.
Clients hire pro because they depend on the photog capturing the key moments in focus. Does that matter?
If you don't get a wide-zoom, you will end up photograph smartphone people butts.