djrocks66: The 7D2 is for a sports or wildlife shooter on a budget. Enough with the DR talk. We all know how much better the Sony sensors are for that. Compare the D7100 buffer with the 7D2. Compare the AF and tracking, I dare you. :)
Not sure I understand. I am saying that the 7D2 has unmatched AF and tracking. It is one of the biggest selling points in my opinion. I have used both a d7000 and d7100 and they do not compare.
The 7D2 is for a sports or wildlife shooter on a budget. Enough with the DR talk. We all know how much better the Sony sensors are for that. Compare the D7100 buffer with the 7D2. Compare the AF and tracking, I dare you. :)
Not sure what you are talking about. I think this image is fine. I have an X-T1 and the 56mm and while I can get a similar shot I don't think it is noticeably better. Maybe my eyes are bad?
Johannes Zander: DXOmark applies to all cameras except Canon and especially this model.
Did I got that right from you canonistas!
" prossi " If you base your inferiority on sensor alone, and that being Dynamic Range for getting detail out of shadows, you would be right. But other then that it is in no way inferior and I would challenge anyone to find a better focusing and tracking cropped sensor camera with the lens choice you have here with Canon. The build and performance of this camera is amazing and the image quality for Wildlife Shooting and Sports hi ISO is great. As much as I love my little mirror less cameras you can just not get this performance yet. If you don't believe then go rent this camera with a Canon 400mm 5.6 and try it out for yourself. Come back and comment on how grossly inferior it is.
djrocks66: I played with this camera at Photoplus NYC. I was excited by the specs but disappointed in the handling and build. It felt like a cheap camera in my hands. Sorry if this offends anyone. I really wanted to like it but it is not for me. I hope who ever orders this camera actually tries it first. The capabilities of it sure do surpass the big guy's offerings but specs alone do not make a camera.
These are good times for photography. Can't really go wrong with any camera. Pick a system and go take pictures. :) All the competition is good for manufactures. It keeps them moving forward.
It had the 50-150 on it. Like I said, I wanted to like it but it just did not feel good in my hands. I actually bought the 7D2 the other day and while it does not compete specs wise it feels so much better and handles like a dream. The AF is unbelievable. I will be watching the reviews of the NX1. I'm sure it will make some very happy.
I played with this camera at Photoplus NYC. I was excited by the specs but disappointed in the handling and build. It felt like a cheap camera in my hands. Sorry if this offends anyone. I really wanted to like it but it is not for me. I hope who ever orders this camera actually tries it first. The capabilities of it sure do surpass the big guy's offerings but specs alone do not make a camera.
fakuryu: If this lens is as good as the Pentax DA* 50-135 f2.8 but has a faster AF, Fuji useers will be in for a treat! I love the IQ of the DA* on my K5II but that AF because of the SDM is a let down.
I thought the lens was that good except for the slowness.
I had that Pentax lens and a K5. You are right. To me that DA* 50-135mm had the best image quality of any lens I used. The only downfall was that AF motor. Now that I have an X-T1 I was hoping that the Fuji lens would be like the DA* but with faster Af.
JaimeA: Please do not post any comments until we get a full review of the Fuji X-E2. How long can we wait??? The camera appeared months ago and has been on sale since. No excuses please.
I guess he is talking about a full review not a round up review. Looking for a nice big number at the end.
It is a shame how Nikon handled this whole situation. This should have been done a long time ago with a recall. I don't think this will hurt their sales though as the majority of Nikon DSLR's sold are of the D3000 and D5000 series. Most people that buy those cameras don't even come to these forums or are unaware of the D600 problem.
This will be my next camera. :) I've been waiting for this since the Olympus E-P1 was announced. Fuji is doing everything right.
Love the Fro and his show. This is a great video for those that are trying to learn flash photography.
Peter Bendheim: The EOS-M in it's current form with the firmware upgrade is a surprisingly nice little camera to use. It's really small with the pancake lens, absolutely solid build that is all magnesium alloy, a tempered glass LCD and pretty good image quality. I like it's ergonomic simplicity, it's easy to use, the lenses are metal bodied, and the IQ is great. The pancake lens is razor sharp, for example. Really as good as anyone could wish for. It would be nice if it had a viewfinder that one could attach. It's also a refreshing design break from all the fake retro, fake leather, Leica look a-likes, and other gimmicks.Hate it as much as you like, folks, especially those of you that have never tried it, but it occupies a deserved place in my camera bag along with the bigger and flashier gear, and has produced images I am very happy with and that form part of my portfolio. I'm sure Canon will eventually produce a more pro model, but this camera isn't half as bad as most of you would like it to be.
I agree with that. I picked up the M with the 22mm real cheap when the price dropped some time ago and it is a nice little camera. If it had focus peaking ( Not Magic Lantern ), a built in flash ( even a small one just for fill), and the ability to turn off the touch screen completely it would be almost perfect for me. I keep enabling the touch screen by accident and it drives me nuts. :)
Paul_B Midlands UK: Big splash Sony - 2000 comments in a day, whereas poor old Pentax K3 150 comments in 5 days, they must be mortified. In this formula if I come back in a week Sony will be at 10,000 ... well probably not ule geeks will all be bored by then and ripping apart the next newbie bit of kit.
I'd still rather have a K3.
HelloToe: Wake me up when they've got a nice, small collapsible zoom like Sony's or Panasonic's...
I wouldn't call the Sony's 16-50 PZ Horrid. It is quite good for what it is. I use it all the time and I am used to using some of Canons finest glass.
GPW: Nikon where is my D400???
They will never make a D400. Move on! :)
zos xavius: What's up with these BSI sensors they are using on these compacts? The MX-1 and Q7 both look great at base ISO and 100% and these all look like water colors. Same goes for their X-5, which is probably the lowest IQ I've seen from a superzoom in some time. I realize these are just OEM cameras that are rebranded, but still. You'd think they could put out sensors that at least give good results at base ISO.
What happens to the XZ-1 Jpeg engine? It was horrible. I guess not being able to turn off NR didn't help. Great raw camera though.
Digitall: From the initial bunch, and generally speaking X100S is the king. Hard to beat.
Who is putting an X100s in their pocket? I have an X20 and wouldn't want it in my pocket. Too big.
Jimmy jang Boo: The NEX-5N has the same IQ but beats both of these cameras in low light/high ISO performance and overall performance by a good margin.
Nah, I had the NEX 6 and the low light / high iso is not better. Sorry.