Arn: I wonder if they will give Lightroom 5 the "Camera Shake Reduction" feature to remove camera shake motion blur, or they will keep it restricted to only Photoshop CC, to rip photographers off? This, if ANY feature is relevant for photographers and would be appropriate for Lightroom.
I think they said not for LR5.
So just try to hold the camera steady or up the shutter speed.
I'm not feeling much love for Adobe around here. Where's the love ?
For my own interest I took a brief googly into the "you sat on your ass" defense -- aka laches defense -- in the Copyright infringement context. Keep in mind Copyright infringement has a statute of limitations.
What I find is, we don't need no stinkin' Laches when there's a statute of limitations.
At least in some Circuits.
The Circuits split on whether they allow it as a defense to infringement. Some don't (4th Circuit) . Some do (9th Circuit).
This photographer sued in the 6th and the 6th appears to split the baby, they will in (very) rare cases allow the defense but only so far as to preclude an injunction, you still can get money damages.
This guys bigger problem is apparently not registering before infringement occurred.
Also, this isn't exactly new news : http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50890656
tkpenalty: Its good adobe dropped the prices for this; its nothing more than ACR repackaged...
My vote so far for most bizarre comment but it's still very early. I almost gave it to the doesn't work with LR3 files but I figured that's just reading comprehension.
"copyright laws are so 20 century haha"
Why don't you use that line at your deposition. Ha ha.
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review