noiseless

noiseless

Lives in South Africa Pretoria, South Africa
Works as a Construction Manager
Joined on Dec 10, 2005

Comments

Total: 118, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On European Bee eaters in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (2 comments in total)

Thank you Ruth. Win, lose or draw, your challenges are always a pleasure. Thank you for being a Host.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2014 at 18:58 UTC as 1st comment
On A Hot Mess in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (4 comments in total)

Beautiful Capture of this Egrets feather expression. Well Done!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 16:35 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On no name bfif in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

RuthC: Your little beauty here is a Heliotrope moth, (Utetheisa pulchelloides). Ruth :-)

Its not in my South Africa butterfly book but Much appreciated. My mystery search is over. Thank you again.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 16:33 UTC
On Behind these hazel eyes... in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (1 comment in total)

Pretty capture and very nice light.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 16:30 UTC as 1st comment
On STRIKING A POSE in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (2 comments in total)

Well done beautiful capture.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 02:59 UTC as 1st comment
On So Close Yet So Far in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (1 comment in total)

Pretty Capture. Well Done!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 03:14 UTC as 1st comment
On Harris's Hawk in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (1 comment in total)

Pretty Capture. Well Done!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 03:13 UTC as 1st comment

It was fun but I am done making changes. Thank you.
By RuthC
I preferred your previous background, since it enhanced the whiteness of the butterfly. Just my thoughts.
By noiseless (This minute)
Thank you for thoughts. I'll revert back to my original background as I have the same observation.
By santamonica812
I guess I had a different reaction than several others. For a "colorful" challenge, I thought the prior background was excellent. You have now muted those colors, which does emphasize the main subject. But the trade-off for this is losing the colorful element.
It's an artistic and editorial decision. Not one I would have made...I did like those colors.
By noiseless
I also enjoyed the original background colours. Thank you for the comment.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 1, 2014 at 11:48 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

RuthC: I preferred your previous background, since it enhanced the whiteness of the butterfly. Just my thoughts.

Thank you for thoughts. I'll back as I have the same observation.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 1, 2014 at 11:32 UTC
In reply to:

babalu: Very beautiful capture . It is doubtless extremely difficult to catch them aloft in such perfect display of wings and extremities. Have you tried to add some contrast to see if it would add more attention to detail and thus get it even more separated from the background ?

Yes I have worked the contrast to its limits without compromising a dark back ground. The original submission has more contrast quality. Thank you for the comment.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 23:23 UTC
In reply to:

santamonica812: I guess I had a different reaction than several others. For a "colorful" challenge, I thought the prior background was excellent. You have now muted those colors, which does emphasize the main subject. But the trade-off for this is losing the colorful element.

It's an artistic and editorial decision. Not one I would have made...I did like those colors.

I also enjoyed the original background colours. Thank you for the comment.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 23:21 UTC

I would like to take one more background vote. Cal may be correct. It appears to me the peripheral detail is more defined. Please let me know. Thank you.
By RuthC (1 hour ago)
I really like this butterfly capture. It's surprisingly difficult to photograph them in flight, as they tend to flutter around in illogical directions. I guess they don't want to be caught by predators, hence their haphazard flights. This is a beautiful photo, and I like the background which I think enhances the whiteness, and textured detail of the butterfly.
By bettyhilda (8 hours ago)
Well caught! I like the background and the sharpness of the butterfly at that distance. There is enough white for me in the picture. I really can't see how you could improve it.
By santamonica812 (8 hours ago)
I really like close-up butterfly photos, and--not surprisingly--I like this one as well. I've never been able to get any shot like this, so I am impressed at the technical skills you've shown.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 13:30 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

santamonica812: I really like close-up butterfly photos, and--not surprisingly--I like this one as well. I've never been able to get any shot like this, so I am impressed at the technical skills you've shown.

On my computer screen, the 2 wings closest to the viewer have a green-yellow cast, while the farther wings look true white. Was this your intent? If so, that's fine; it's an interesting contrast of colors and a perfectly legitimate artistic choice. (There's enough white in the 2 other wings to satisfy this challenge, IMO.)

If it was not your intent, then you might need to color-correct on the two closer wings, so that all 4 look white. Totally up to you, and to your own editorial judgment.

I wish we got butterflies in my part of the state. :-(

This is a wonderful comment and I want to thank you.
Most of my butterfly in flight captures were attempted in Indonesia. South Africa BFIF are far and few so I concentrate on birds.
The species is a Belenois aurota and on the hind wing is slightly tinged with yellow according to Wikipedia. I am not a butterfly addict only enjoy stop action opportunities.
What I really enjoy from these captures is as much eye detail as possible.
Again thank you for all the comments. They have helped me to try and get in line with the challenge subject.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 05:24 UTC
In reply to:

bettyhilda: Well caught! I like the background and the sharpness of the butterfly at that distance. There is enough white for me in the picture. I really can't see how you could improve it.

Much appreciated and I will keep this one in the challenge.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 05:00 UTC

By santamonica812 (1 hour ago)
This is now a very dramatic composition and the branches add a nice dimension. Since the sky/background is blue/gray, I'm still not sure if there is any white element in your photo.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 02:44 UTC as 5th comment

Good point. Let me see if I can fish something else out of my files "with a lot of white in the subject or the background". Appreciate the comment.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 02:01 UTC as 1st comment

By MarioSS
Nice capture and very sharp. I personally would recompose this picture by cropping the upper and left part but just by a tad. Also, the sky is blue but the challenge requirements is that it must be a lot of white. This can be fix by changing at post-process the white balance or by adding a warming filter.
By bettyhilda Oh this is nice. I would remove the twig coming out from under the left wing as it is distracting
By RuthC
Great bird capture, with stunning colours, but.... it looks too crowded within this frame, as though there is nowhere for it to fly. Could you reduce the amount of cropping, so the bird has more space to be seen?
Thank you for the comments.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2013 at 23:30 UTC as 3rd comment

Decided to use this capture to hopefully support the comments. Had to over expose a little for better white background and no masking was used though lightroom 5 seem to work better than dpp.
By RuthC (8 hours ago)
Great bird capture, with stunning colours, but.... it looks too crowded within this frame, as though there is nowhere for it to fly. Could you reduce the amount of cropping, so the bird has more space to be seen?
LIKE1
REPLY
Flag as inappropriate
By noiseless (26 min ago)
I could throw the tail in and remove some of the boxy capture. Would probably loose whatever detail I managed at ISO 5000. Let me take a look at the other photos but I would rather not lose my slot in this challenge. Thank you for the comment.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2013 at 22:00 UTC as 5th comment

I like the entry. The subjects colour and back ground meet the challenge's requirements and is a pleasant capture to my eye.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2013 at 21:21 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

santamonica812: It's a lovely image of a bird. But it looks on my screen as though it's been masked (reasonably well, but not perfectly) and copied onto a white background, in order to fit into the challenge.

If you are going to mask, I think this image might need a slightly finer touch (especially on the rear of the upper feathers.

The bird itself is fantastic--super colorful and perfect for the challenge (other than my above-mentioned concern)

I can appreciate your mask comment and strangely as it may seem have also received similar in my other Dp challenges. Please see (http://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=763230). Nothing fancy and straight out of Canon using DPP post exposure, noise reduction, sharpening and contrast adjustments. I don't quite understand the mask function on my recently purchased Adobe light room 5 and would probably not spend the time figuring out as I really don't like to waste post review fixing a poor capture.
The wing tips were outside the profile f5.6 and >20m capture distance plane but I thought the eye and beak would satisfy the image.
Thanks again for the comment and I may continue to consider using this photo for the challenge though I am thinking about RuthC's comment.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2013 at 21:15 UTC
Total: 118, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »