derfla1949

A DSLR-like superzoom with a 1/2.33" sensor.
'nuff said.

Flawed firmware?
Nikon?

Now how can that be???

I used to think gawd makes no mistakes.

Quote: "We will be adding more samples in the coming days. "
That was on July 1st.

More sample images please, as promised.
Or ask Robin Wong for some.

This thread presently isn't up to dpreview standards.

For me, the specs read ok.
The major remaining question is the quality of the lens.
For 500+X bucks it had better be very, very good.

BTW, what makes P6270021 so "perfect" that it made the cut?
The fact that it is sharp nowhere?

Still ISO 1000 and ISO 1600 pics in the gallery.
What for?
Come on,. dpreview, you can do it much better.

What is the point of making sample pictures for a f1.8 lens with ISO 8000 ?????

To me, this is utter nonsense.
A significant part of the images is completely useless for assessing the quality of...

I do not get it.
How can NIKON, for sure a company capable of making excellent cameras produce such a piece of crap?
How can this rip-off (scheme: if it is NIKON, it must be good) still work?

I do not get it.
How can NIKON, for sure a company capable of making excellent cameras produce such a piece of crap?
How can this rip-off (scheme: if it is NIKON, it must be good) still work, and...

I do not get it.
How can NIKON, for sure a company capable of making excellent cameras, produce such a piece of crap?
How can this rip-off (scheme: if it is NIKON, it must be good) still work, and...

To me this lens smells very strongly like a precursor to a soon to be announced mirrorless system.
m43 is going to have serious competition.
This is good news.

Let us hope so.
Every decent lens offering is positive for the m43 system.

Looks like you are jumping to conclusions way to fast.
Let us first see some real test before we attach the "bes P&S" label.
BTW, the price tag is already there ...