Lives in United States Statesville, NC, United States
Works as a retired
Joined on Aug 27, 2005
About me:

Try to get better at this.


Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12
In reply to:

joe6pack: Is it the infamous shake removal tool that removes 'synthetic blur' image?


Or anybody that pirated it also, don't want to leave them out.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2015 at 14:21 UTC
In reply to:

FantasticMrFox: Oh, great - I bought the stand-alone LR 6 (a program that's just two months old!) two days ago and now there's an update that the cloud version will get but I won't. Is that the kind of support I paid €129 for?! Pathetic.

Maybe DPR would mind picking this up for an article.

The Lightroom version usually comes out a little after the PS one.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2015 at 00:12 UTC
In reply to:

RichRMA: The issue is being taken seriously by the mfg? And here I thought a chronic 60% defect rate would be taken lightly.

Is saying it is only 30% supposed to make people feel better?

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 12:55 UTC
On Fujifilm X100T Review (679 comments in total)
In reply to:

bigdaddave: I cannot believe the 'Cons' section doesn't mention the elephant in the room - IT ONLY HAS ONE FOCAL LENGTH

In the days when even a compact camera the size of a pack of cigs has a reasonable zoom this 1950's throwback might appeal to the well-heeled but as an actual tool it's far far too limited

But DP love Fuji so they've overlooked the obvious again

I guess you never go out with just a prime lens to shot for the day. A lot of people do, so this camera fills that need not to have to carry a bigger dslr around. I don't have one, but would love it if I had.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2015 at 10:26 UTC
On article Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm (339 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rod McD: I know this is principally a gear driven site, but I think products like these very exclusive and expensive lenses must lead us to ask whether the gear is more important than who's behind it and what's in front of it. Adams, HCB, Capa - none of them had lenses as good as we have today. Did it matter? An image is more about moment and content than technology.

Well the Leica lens they used weren't exactly mush.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 13:10 UTC
In reply to:

forpetessake: How is Sigma's "try before you buy" any better than buy and return for full refund if not satisfied most vendors offer? In fact it's worse, Sigma offers just one week, while most vendors allow 30 days of use.

Vendors must love people like you.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2014 at 12:19 UTC
On article A travel-sized large-format 4x5 camera? (219 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wim1964: Attractive idea, but (and that's what keeping me from buying/using a filmcamera); very impractical. With larger sensor compact camera's around (and a few nifty post-processing filters) you can get roughly the same effects. Not the same quality perhaps...there are some nice snaps on that flickr-page! :)

Comparing the quality of a large sensor p&s to 4x5 film is like comparing a ford focus to a Ferrari.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 01:39 UTC
On article CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Sony a6000 (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

DaveE1: The perspective along with the tiny hands in those photos had me looking to see if that thing had luggage wheels.

It's small in reality. Check out the specs.

I looked at those pictures and thought the camera was as big as my Fuji Xpro1.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 14:59 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: I think many of you are being unfair to Leica, and to Leica users by extension.

While I personally wouldn't spend several hundred dollars more for a Leica version of a Panasonic camera, there are plenty of people who would. "A few hundred dollars more" is a relative term, based on how much disposable income you have. Some folks have the money for this, even if I don't.

And selling these rebadged Panasonic cameras might be one of the things that helped bring Leica back from the brink of bankruptcy around ten years ago. This might even be why Leica can sell full frame rangefinder cameras today, that many professional photographers swear by.

We as a group of photo enthusiasts are better off having Leica still in business, even if their products are out of our price range.


Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2013 at 23:29 UTC
In reply to:

Heie2: DPR - Please do the correct thing of classifying this as the same category as the Canon T4i. While the K-30 has significantly better IQ and will compare to the K-5 and D7000 for overall IQ, classifying it at those levels will cause it to be improperly scored compared to the T4i - it's main competition.

The kr was discontinued and replaced with the k30.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2012 at 11:48 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: No 1080P30 or 720P60 and has a 30 minute record limit. THAT is s dealbreaker for me.

I never came close to a 30 minute continuous clip myself, so that isn't a big deal for me.

Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 15:07 UTC
In reply to:

johnlovesmaine: will leica join 4/3 group?

If they join 4/3 system it would have to be with another camera, since this one is going to be at least aps-c

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2011 at 23:34 UTC
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12