backayonder

backayonder

Lives in Australia South Coast Woop Woop, Australia
Works as a Dreamer
Has a website at http://www.deangale.com
Joined on Jan 10, 2006

Comments

Total: 315, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Looking on the bright side at least there will be no more pointless threads about what lens to take on a vacation to Europe.

All you will need is a lens cap.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 5, 2015 at 12:58 UTC as 37th comment
On Vantage Point: The aviation photography of Jon Pece article (203 comments in total)

Can't help but think that many of you who are here today making a comment are doing so because of these so called killing machines

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2015 at 10:05 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

backayonder: A few months ago I noticed that when I edited a photo in Lightroom 5.7 and then opened it up in CS5 the image was dark so eventually decided to pay $9.99 a month for the latest Lightroom and Photoshop.

Problem solved. Just two cups of coffee a month its a no brainer especially when I think how much I have paid over the years whenever I upgraded Lightroom or Photoshop.

No you do not have to be online yes the software is installed on your PC and yes your work can be saved on your hard drive. I do not store any work on the cloud.

I have just checked on that well known auction site and there is hardly any copies of Photoshop for sale so Adobe have been successful in knocking Pirate copies on the head by going with the Subscription format and Lightroom is so cheap why would you bother with a dodgy copy?

As Photographers we are always updating our gear yet baulk at this subscription model? It is small change compared to the cost of getting our images developed in the old days of film?

$9.99 a month that is how much I pay for The photography package. Large flat white about $5.20 AUD

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 11:43 UTC
In reply to:

backayonder: A few months ago I noticed that when I edited a photo in Lightroom 5.7 and then opened it up in CS5 the image was dark so eventually decided to pay $9.99 a month for the latest Lightroom and Photoshop.

Problem solved. Just two cups of coffee a month its a no brainer especially when I think how much I have paid over the years whenever I upgraded Lightroom or Photoshop.

No you do not have to be online yes the software is installed on your PC and yes your work can be saved on your hard drive. I do not store any work on the cloud.

I have just checked on that well known auction site and there is hardly any copies of Photoshop for sale so Adobe have been successful in knocking Pirate copies on the head by going with the Subscription format and Lightroom is so cheap why would you bother with a dodgy copy?

As Photographers we are always updating our gear yet baulk at this subscription model? It is small change compared to the cost of getting our images developed in the old days of film?

So what is it that you don't like exactly?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 02:13 UTC

A few months ago I noticed that when I edited a photo in Lightroom 5.7 and then opened it up in CS5 the image was dark so eventually decided to pay $9.99 a month for the latest Lightroom and Photoshop.

Problem solved. Just two cups of coffee a month its a no brainer especially when I think how much I have paid over the years whenever I upgraded Lightroom or Photoshop.

No you do not have to be online yes the software is installed on your PC and yes your work can be saved on your hard drive. I do not store any work on the cloud.

I have just checked on that well known auction site and there is hardly any copies of Photoshop for sale so Adobe have been successful in knocking Pirate copies on the head by going with the Subscription format and Lightroom is so cheap why would you bother with a dodgy copy?

As Photographers we are always updating our gear yet baulk at this subscription model? It is small change compared to the cost of getting our images developed in the old days of film?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2015 at 21:45 UTC as 7th comment | 6 replies

Yes of course I would love to own a Leica and just one lens but I have to laugh at your statement in the first image where the camera is sitting in the palm of your hand.

"The red dot sits where the viewfinder should be"

One of the most important things on a camera has been replaced with a RED DOT ! And it will still sell

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 21:08 UTC as 76th comment | 1 reply

So she knows Herman Munster?

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2015 at 21:40 UTC as 129th comment
On Canon drops prices on 31 high-end L lenses article (58 comments in total)

meanwhile in Australia Nikon dealers are advertising a price increase for Nikon lenses

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 20:47 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies
On World Press Photo revokes prize from Giovanni Troilo article (100 comments in total)

Reminds me of a hotel I once stayed in. The plumbing was shocking

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 21:10 UTC as 34th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (3380 comments in total)

Out of interest how many megapixels did my old Canon A1 have when using a roll of Kodachrome?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 05:12 UTC as 352nd comment | 3 replies

Hmmn not gone Full Frame yet but what price a new 5D mk3 before they dissappear?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 04:31 UTC as 65th comment
On Samsung introduces NX500 with NX1's 28MP BSI sensor article (143 comments in total)

Does it have a viewfinder? And if not is the camera useless in bright sunlight ?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 00:59 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

backayonder: I shall hold off on buying the D750 then?

Yes

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 06:10 UTC

I shall hold off on buying the D750 then?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 01:12 UTC as 122nd comment | 2 replies
On Adobe details OS support for next version of Lightroom article (229 comments in total)

Just in time for my new PC upgrade

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 00:48 UTC as 24th comment
On Nikon D750 flare investigated: Why we're not worried article (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

steelhead3: I can't understand why DP would justify their high score for the 750 with explaining that the total recall of a their favorite camera is not justified.

Oh Rishi I feel for you. Do you ever feel like not going to work some days? I hope that DP provide you, Barney and the rest of the staff with a sound proof padded cell where you can go and let off steam. Failing that good coffee.

Keep Smiling

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2015 at 05:48 UTC
In reply to:

backayonder: Camera's evolve but the human eye doesn't.

Yes but they haven't evolved much since the Box Brownie was released

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2015 at 00:54 UTC

Camera's evolve but the human eye doesn't.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 14, 2015 at 04:55 UTC as 89th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

backayonder: Who gets paid the photographer?

Thanks

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2014 at 07:19 UTC
On Real-world test: Nikon D750 at the Museum of Flight article (281 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rikaby: Any news regarding the D810 review or preview?

Why don't you just buy one its only money then you can tell us. Its been out that long what more do you need to know.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2014 at 07:18 UTC
Total: 315, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »