Michael Ma: Amazing concept. Although, just skimming through these, I think your time would be better invested in something like Lynda.com for online learning. I don't disagree with the importance of a degree and having to go through a system getting one but Professors, although they do certainly possess valuable information that you want and need, don't necessarily make good teachers or presenters. If you've ever taught, a big part of the lesson plan is figuring out how to fill the 50 minutes or 80 minutes, which often results in a lot of endless droning of slides and creative ways to fill time.
Why not a carefully crafted 15 minute lecture that inspires and moves, and a few key takeaway concepts? Some students would complain that they are not getting their money's worth.
That carefully crafted 15 minute lecture may take 40 hours of research, planning, and prep. Instead you can just put 30 slides together and wing it based on your knowledge, and hopefully some of what you say will be absorbed.
I second B CRAW's comments. Higher education should be more than "down-loading course material". Ideally it's an environment a student can escape into, to immerse him/herself in for a while outside of the real world and question, experiment, reflect. The professor doesn't need to be a know-it-all, end-all resource. He/she needs to be an instigator, a provocateur, a coach. Someone who can push the student beyond their comfort zone and status quo.
And to Michael Ma, that's a poor teacher who has to "figure out" how to fill class time. That guy is punching his time card, not education students.
foto guy: Who cares? These and other cameras can shoot a decent pic at quite high ISOs. Do you think you folks could focus on something important for a change? Perhaps photography, for instance.
Photography? I thought this site was about cameras!
Kiril Karaatanasov: DPREVIEW guys do you think many D4s users shoot JPEG? Can you compare RAW files e.g. d4 vs d4s? Also is 5d mk3 and A7 in same league at all? How about 1Dx? Best will be test against A7s which seems to be closest in terms of sensor to D4s
"That's because creating a JPEG in the camera is an engineer's artwork. "
That's why all the best photographers are engineers. Artists suck! I'm not going to take another picture until I can buy a camera engineered to know what I want photos of. How do I know what a good photo is? Ask an engineer!
OceanFroggie: Nice camera wrong mount. If the non canikon also rans produced stunning cameras like this with either the Canon or Nikon mount they would sell more bodies.
I use a Canon professionally because they are the only ones who make a 24mm t+s with no distortion and the only ones who make a 17mm t+s at all. For years now on both counts. And that's only the beginning of what they do well. But what about FEATURES?! My Canon can't makes calls!
gsum: "rare meteorological event" -
It's not rare and it's not meteorological. Couldn't be bothered reading the rest of the article after that.
Sorry, Joriarty; no level-headed rational responders allowed. I don't know how you got in past the guards.
Oh ma GAWD!
And I hear there is a new Canon WTF in the works... And a Nikon LMAO... And a Fuji... oh never mind.
Upcoming poll: Hammer - vs- Screwdriver? Which is the BEST?
Designing photographer-friendly cameras ought to be more "tautological"? Really?
Oh, yeah - and I am one of those "stupid enough". I like to think I'm more than JUST stupid enough...
OK, I'm softening on my anger at Adobe. $10/month isn't so bad - especially now it includes some cloud storage - which is fairly useless still because you can't up-load folders, but I suspect they'll fix that eventually. Dropbox and others charge nearly as much for storage alone.
And I understand that they need to make a return on their investment. PS is the very best and I gotta have it for what I do for my livelihood. They deserve compensation.
I've owned an FM, an FM2 and an FM3a in years past - so I've probably got a target on my back for one of these silly things. But, no thanks. The original FM was a lean, rugged, straight-forward photo-taking instrument. This thing is nostalgia bait for snagging doctors' and bankers' dollars.
I love it. This is a great idea and I hope Canon takes note. I can see this being the future for wide angle lenses that have had to deal with that mirror-flipping space. Maybe the next generation of wide TS lenses can be designed without any distance constraints on that inner-most element and be lighter, brighter, sharper, prettier... And while I'm making requests of Canon, how about put the tripod mount on the lens in such a way that the CAMERA shifts, not the lens? Like an Arca-Swiss R series body...
What I'd really like to see is an objective, head to head comparison between a Capresso Infinity coffee grinder and a tuna sandwich. I've got my own suspicions which is best, but I'd like to see a scientific DxO evaluation before I decide.
DenWil: "iPhone Photographers" as a group should get over themselves and actually buy functional adjustable cameras. Phone cameras are a convenience for spur of the moment needs. They were never and should not be expected to supplant a 2.8 L lens on a DSLR with a FF 24MP sensor. 2.0 on a piece of glass 3mm across is not my idea of mechanical excellence. The obsession over this is comedy.
DenWil, agreed. I don't know why people are so outraged that their PHONE isn't the perfect camera. Yes you may always have the phone with you, but that's because your ultimate priority is "communicating". If your ultimate priority is "photos", you'd carry a camera. I wish my phone had a scuba app because there are a lot of times I'd like to go diving and all I've got with me is a phone - why should I have to get an actual scuba tank?
And those of us who signed up for the "promotional" 9.99/month?
Loyal customers buying their products year after year is not enough for this giant corporation. What they want is a steady, uninterrupted flow of my money into their pockets. They'll get it it, probably, for a while. And then I jump as fast as I can to the next available equal alternative. You gotta know there is somebody out there at this very minute salivating at the opportunity.
OK I am an old dog and struggle with change. I understand from previous posts that LR can sync with my old folder system, and that sounds reassuring. But I edit stuff from my local hard drive and then move everything (in that project) to a relatively slow Drobo for storage. My worry that is moving stuff around in folders will cause LR to freak out and lose track...
Gotta weigh in.
I think it's perfectly fine that a guy is taping a phone to his binoculars and posting the photos to a blog. Why not. My only worry is that there is a strong popular pressure to accept everything as "good enough". It's an extension of the "anti-intelectualism" we've been famous for since Andrew Jackson's time. And it's not just in photography, but in English - you're just being arrogant if you worry about using "your" in the wrong place. Or go to Home Depot and look at the quality of building materials available. These athletes spend a great deal of their time and energy and resources getting to the olympics. I'm happy to see Canon and Nikon rolling out their best for the occasion as well.
This looks fantastic!
I love the ring around the shutter button, the hotshoe, the new mount, the big sensor, the filter threads on the lens, the adapter for EF lenses. Even the look of it is awesome. It's like the best of Sony's NEX-5 WITH Canon lenses! Sure a viewfinder would be nice, but it's more compact without, so all is good.
I don't know why people will bitch and moan about every new everything. I mean I was not happy the G-X (or whatever it is) didn't accept filters, because in my mind, I don't want to always have to fool with a damned lens cap - so I didn't buy one!