JosephScha

Actually, I use Photoshop Elements. So this doesn't affect me, exactly. What troubles me most is that Adobe did not listen to its users. I remember they did a poll. I feel certain the results...

I don't see much wrong, other than the motion blur (which you didn't want).   How fast can the exposure be on an EM5?  Almost certainly 1/2000 of a second of faster.  That would eliminate 3/4 of...

Here is my sequence order of prime lens purchases for micro four thirds: 1) 25mm f/1.4

Beautiful picture of strawberries, that's the one I really like.

Remember the 300mm (even if f/2.8) would not have as much reach on you Canon as 300mm on micro four thirds.  It certainly looks like you've made very good use that on m43!  Great shots, with...

Lovely!  The 100-300  (you left out a 0, you wrote 100-30) did very well, probably at max. That extra reach over the 200 really helps.  I couldn't fill the frame with such a small bird without...

Yes I did; the cal result shows 97% of sRGB.  The longer analytical tests said 98%.  It is supposed to be an IPS screen.  I say supposed to be because I expected, you know, 178 degree viewing angle...

Something posted here a few weeks ago made me buy a Spyder4pro display calibrator. I thought my display was pretty close, and it was; but the before/after switch (you know, you can click back and...

Yes, but less than 1/3 stop is a very small difference Yes, but usually that is negligible.

I almost hate to say this.  If you want more depth in good focus, get a camera with a smaller sensor. I'm not sure what DSLR you have, but if it's FF then: APSc - crop factor of 1.5 or 1.6.  So...

A different raw developed version of one of my first 25mm f/1.4 shots. Look at this large, you can see the threads in the tablecloth right under the die.  And look at the totally creamy OOF...

Look at it large, I uploaded original size. I chose f/5.6 to get this much DOF. You get the clear impression of lots of blossoms in the near background, but the group in front is the only one in...

Look at it large, I uploaded original size. I love that f/5.6 gets just this much DOF. You get the clear impression of lots of blossoms in the near background, but the group in front is the only...

Look at it large. Full 4000x3000 image was uploaded.

^--- see 2nd version

^--- see 2nd version of this comment

re: "Olympus and Panasonic only?" Wait, pretty soon we'll be able to answer "and Kodak!"

not sure what you were aiming for, that you think this needs improving.If you wanted every thing in focus, use a smaller aperture. You might remove the plant in the lower left.But I suspect that...

I bought mine from Amazon.com, only because they had it and at that time B&H did not. Otherwise would have ordered from B&H.--js

Very good macro photography. The most interesting thing to me is that you chose to show them in black and white.  Makes me wonder what colors I am missing.