completelyrandomstuff: That's a lot of money, but Canon and Nikon ask for the same amount. The difference is that Canon/Nikon have image stabilization and Pentax has weather sealing.
But pentax have stabilization in the body, no?
Fredy Ross: I don't trust cloud storage prefer to store on external hard drives.
The nice thing about the cloud is the background immediacy. I save my Lightroom catalogue, and in under a minute I have an offsite backup.
The problem, at least for me, is that my ADSL is about 80KBPS upstream. No way I'm putting RAW files on that.
I've also had problems with specific software. Last time I tried them, Google and MS both used full upload bandwidth and choked my internet with no way to stop them. Dropbox can at least be given hard bandwidth limits, though its adaptive mode doesn't really work.
They also all had some BS that stopped them putting files on my 32GB micro SD card plugged into my phone. They only use the 2GB internal.
They're pretty brain dead software, or they were a year ago. I blame Apple. ;)
The 7D2 seems at home in this company. I don't see much to choose in the raws.
I would choose between current APS cameras for reasons other than image quality:- 7D2 is fast, has big AF area with slick joystick, very solid build, but it's heavy and expensive- D7100 performs quite well if the buffer is enough for you, good price, good flash- K3 has very nice viewfinder and ergonomics at a good price, but Pentax is a bit fringe- A77 II is fast and slick, and cheap, and has an EVF if you like them, but A mount has less support and it looks like this won't improve- A6000 has worse lens selection than DSLRs, and not such a good shooting experience, but it's much better for lugging around when not in use
If you care about the modest difference in sensors between these cameras, I think you should really be looking at full frame.
I've never seen a 493 ppi screen, I thought the "retina" was meant to be all we need.
Is 493ppi useful?
Is it regularly useful?
If it's not regularly useful, would we be better off with more battery life?
This does not look bad. It looks like an APS camera, better than MFT and worse than FF.
In the shot of the farm store truck, you lifted the shadows under the truck to the point that it looks nothing like real light (i.e. far more than I would want to) and nothing broke.
The ISO 3200 bar shot is also way overcooked, and sharpened more than I feel wise for a noisy picture, and it looks about as good as I would expect if I abused my Nex-6 that way.
I would like to put the 3200 and 12800 raws through DXO Prime and see what happens...
helltormentor: @Rishi Sanyal
I am going to upgrade to a full frame camera. Since I am fond of manual focusing, initially, I wanted to go for the Sony A99 with its EVF and manual focus assists but I realized that its high ISO performance was not on par with Nikon FFs. Since you have not included the A99 in your new studio scene, an accurate comparison is not possible. Can you please tell me how many stops does it fall behind its Nikon peers (this D750 for instance)? I think up to 1 stop could be acceptable since it can compensate for it with its IBIS.
" do you not find manual focus a bit cumbersome with the number of steps it takes for you to enlarge the area of interest you want focused? You have to move the AF box around first, then zoom in, then manual focus..."
Oh this is so true. Magnified MF is deadly accurate, but I usually miss the shot.
As for AF... For my street-like purposes, I don't overly care if a camera focuses in 100 or 200 milliseconds, when getting the AF or MF point where you want takes seconds.
I remember the first time I used face detect on a Nex on a group of people: it lit up five white boxes over five faces and I thought "I have achieved Nirvana, now which wheel do I turn to pick the right face?" And it turned out that there was no such control, the camera picks a face, usually the wrong one.
As for lock and compose, this had one person in it when I started: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/80519209/DSC03919.jpg
You should do an editorial on the improving the user interface for focus systems.
Richard Murdey: Impressive samples.
We've clearly reached the point where the technical properties of a full frame sensor are of limited interest. It's more than good enough. If you can't manage to get a satisfactory image out of a camera like the D750, the problem is either with the lens, with what is put in front of the lens, ... or what is occupying the space behind the rear LCD!
I've been on a 15 year project photographing in the British Museum, starting on film. It gets down to -5EV in there. I beg to differ :)
* goes back to comparing A7s and Df high ISO samples *
lacikuss: The camera looks fantastic on the specs sheet however, I used to have a D600, and in the pictures here I see many more highlight blowouts than with my former camera. As a matter of fact most of the clouds are over exposed in the sunny pictures. I asume that these pictures were taken with autoexposure (P mode maybe), then the camera doesn´t expose well.
I also have a 6D and the High ISO performance of this D750 is not as good.
I don't know but maybe is the photographer's fault.
Thank you for "showing your workings" Rishi.
I would have used less processing to equalize the light, and just let the horse/rider look a bit dark against the sky. Your look rings my "this is not real light" bells.
But your version is perfectly reasonable. I imagine that it's something you'd have to do if you were producing pictures for print, rather than a monitor with 2 stops more dynamic range than paper. [I haven't printed in a decade, not sure how it works anymore.]
Anyhow, the extensive processing shows that the file will stand it. Which is nice to know.
I rather like the shot of the bull on the bench. There has been a fashion for statues like that in recent years, and I think it is a good thing.
Would be nice to see it with less DoF, if you happen to visit again.
Peter Gurdes: a more serious approach....
on rumor websites there was talking about a rumor that canon doing something "historical", something canon has not done before.it was said it would be something big, coming at photokina or shortly after that.
rumor did not say it was a new camera.
They're going to make a small white box that plays music, and start an internet store to sell tunes for it.
Some great answers here. :) I especially like:
yzhenkai: EF-S 17-55 F2.8Lgustabod: a Nikon D400Iznogoud: A 2 mega pickles camera with night vision [I really want this. A camera that you can slice up and add to 2 million sandwiches.]dpreview: Wi-Fi-enabled 6x4 inch portable printer
As for something that really would amaze me, that I think is probably impossible... How about tracking AF so good that serious video people who stick to manual focus will use it?
They're gonna make DSLTs with a flipping mirror
mumintroll: Many people arguing that it has 4K video and? How many from you have 4K TV or monitor? Me not and I will not have it anytime soon. Sure 4K is the future but today?
That vimeo file looked awfully flat, then I realized it was in TV levels (16..235) and corrected it for PC. It's still not contrasty enough for my taste, but that's his prerogative.
Anyhow.. this talk of shooting video and picking the decisive moment later intrigues me.
*strokes chin, fondles fluffy white cat*
I think we'd all like to see what a raw converter can do with the 12800 shot...
The set looks reasonable for an APS camera. Based just on those, I don't think I would avoid or prefer this camera because of image quality.
"Allison was quite emitted with this orange E-M10."
Is "emitted" spellcheckereze for "smitten"?
tompabes2: LOL... nice headline! :)
With a headline like that, I thought it was going to be about video rigs.
Joel Benford: As a Nex-6 owner, the LX100 prompted me to check this: http://camerasize.com/compact/#332,569,535.360,493.421,ga,t
There's a rather small size difference between the Panasonic and the Sony A6000. The prices are not fundamentally different either. And there's probably not a huge difference in DoF with the lenses shown. The A6000 has a lens mount, but I have a nagging feeling the LX100 may have better ergonomics.
Yes, indeed. Though having twice the pixels on the A6000 is probably worth something too. Ach, let's wait for the test shots. :)
As a Nex-6 owner, the LX100 prompted me to check this: http://camerasize.com/compact/#332,569,535.360,493.421,ga,t
GPW: If I step up it will be to the Canon 7Dll and screw Nikon!!!
I find the joystick on the 7d2 attractive compared to the controller on the D750. For me, the biggest problem with autofocus cameras is the user interface for focus point selection. If you want to pick an AF point that's 30% in from the left and 25% down from the top, it can take several seconds and many keypresses.
I also like that the 7D2 AF covers more of the frame, though the D750 ain't bad.
10fps... I don't really need it, but I expect some people do.
sjredo: And still, no portrait option after what? 6 years? Damn you Sony.
On a slight tangent...
"35mm isn't a portrait lens in the traditional sense."
Well, not in the dpreview readers traditional sense.
But a few months ago I went to the Taylor Wessing Photo Portrait Prize exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London. The great majority of the 100 or so pictures were shot with standard or slightly wide lenses (on everything from APS SLRs to 10x8 monorails). You could count the 85ish lenses on one hand.
Why? Because they were whole body or upper body environmental portraits, which showed the subject in some way that indicated why they were interesting.
It seems to me 85mm is really "head and shoulders portrait length" -- for a head and shoulders crop, it gives you enough viewing distance to make the nose look smaller and stop hiding the ears behind the cheekbones. For environmental portraits, you use the same distance for the "flattering perspective" but a wider lens to get the context in.