neo_nights

neo_nights

Lives in Brazil Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
Works as a Student
Joined on Oct 10, 2007
About me:

Plan? To take over the world!

Comments

Total: 376, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

RobertZ_si: For photo Vineyards Slovenia (5), type "slovenija vinsko srce" into google pictures...came across ? copy of the copy

Well..... type "Eiffel Tower" and you'll see many copy of the copies. I guess it's just a matter of it being an obvious subject, with that heart-shaped road.

But the photographer had the care to come back later when the lighting was good. So it's not really a matter of subject/framing but also how well you do it.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2015 at 09:04 UTC
In reply to:

Sean65: A beach is a garden?

If you own an island, the beach becomes your garden!
:D

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 15:18 UTC

Photo #9...... wow!!!

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2015 at 02:03 UTC as 76th comment | 2 replies
On article Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Review (88 comments in total)
In reply to:

marc petzold: Any why is that, we'd see a not only very old Galaxy Smartphone review ages later after release - but here onto the main DPR site? It's simply a review for connect dpreview, not the Main site here. Perhaps Lars Rehm was sleeping,
or just Banana at this moment, no offence. ;)

I guess it doesn't go to Connect because it's not a phone...

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 14:19 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Review (88 comments in total)

"The Droid you're looking for?"

OMG, DPREVIEW, WHY DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO MAKE FUNNY COMMENTS ABOUT SAMSUNG? Ur not professional! Ur so Canikon biased!!11!! Y u do this?

And, btw, where's K3 review??

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 21:43 UTC as 37th comment
On article CP+ 2015: Canon shows off prototype 120MP CMOS sensor (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

neo_nights: Sony's working on a stacked sensor. Canon on a stuffed sensor :)

@Zeiss - Sony has ended with that strategy of showing wooden cameras. Didn't quite work well for the A700's successor :p

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 12:09 UTC
On article CP+ 2015: Canon shows off prototype 120MP CMOS sensor (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

neo_nights: Sony's working on a stacked sensor. Canon on a stuffed sensor :)

Still making the best sensors currently?

Don't take my comment seriously. I just couldn't resist that pun :)

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 11:30 UTC
On article CP+ 2015: Canon shows off prototype 120MP CMOS sensor (255 comments in total)

Sony's working on a stacked sensor. Canon on a stuffed sensor :)

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 10:05 UTC as 90th comment | 4 replies

I'm having issues with straight lines. At least in closed environments, like a living room, with couch, tables and doors.

Does it work better in a more open environment, like landscape photography? Any good tips from people who have been using this for longer time?

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 09:52 UTC as 4th comment
On article CP+ 2015: Hands-on with new Pentax K-S2 (171 comments in total)

Geez, where did all that b*tthurt from Pentax fans come from?

And I quite liked this army green! I only wish Pentax had used this KS design for their mirrorless camera...

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 02:38 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

Petroglyph: Is the 25-70 f/2.8 a typo? Maybe it should be 24-70?

Considering Pentax and their weird focal lenghts (like 77mm)..... 25-70 could very well be a thing!

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 01:21 UTC
In reply to:

neo_nights: Is it me or does it have more of a Medium Format look?

It'd be nice to see if Pentax could make a small camera (for fullframe standards of course) like they did with the K5.

@Richard - Yes, it could be small. It could be a "baby MF" look. Still... I'd expect something more in line with the K5/K3.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 01:02 UTC

Is it me or does it have more of a Medium Format look?

It'd be nice to see if Pentax could make a small camera (for fullframe standards of course) like they did with the K5.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 16:35 UTC as 92nd comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: DPR: "Nikon aims for the stars with the D810A, world’s first full-frame astrophotography camera"

Really ?
"The Sony A7s is going to be the next big thing with astrophotography."
http://www.jtwastronomy.com/products/modified_sony_a7s.html

http://petapixel.com/2014/07/30/sony-a7s-astrophotography-review/

I thought that Canon already had made a modified version of one of their fullframes to astrophotography.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 01:01 UTC
In reply to:

Beat Traveller: Nice. But where is the K3 review?

What? ONLY A GOLD AWARD???

You guys are sooooo Canikon biased!

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 23:34 UTC
On article 3,200 megapixel LSST camera gets construction approval (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

jabilson007: Sample image:

http://bit.ly/1kV0UEY

Own! SO WOVEWY!!!

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2015 at 21:15 UTC
In reply to:

dgeugene1: Nothing better than a three-legged horse.

Maybe my monitor is defective, because I can easily see four legs.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2015 at 18:15 UTC
On article UPDATED: Real-world samples: Sony Alpha 7 II in Kauai (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

neo_nights: Let's face it: sensor technology has got to a point where you simply CAN'T decide between cameras based on image quality alone. Unless you pixel peep (which is expected from a gear forum, I know), a picture *well taken* with a Canon 1000D and a Sony A7 is negligible for most people's eyes.

So, while those galleries (by 'galleries' I mean: from all the recent cameras that have been posted on DPR) are nice to give SOME idea about a camera, it can't be the decisive factor.

@HowaboutRAW - Well, there are some posts here ditching the image quality of the A7II.
(TBH, I find them a bit "too digital" for my taste. But that's me pixel peeping. I wouldn't mind getting an A7II if someone wanted to give one to me :D)

@ Rinkos: " i doubt a person is buying a dslr based on that ." You almost answered your initial question with this quote.

Exactly what I said: since image quality has been getting "good enough", people won't (or SHOULDN'T) by a camera based on image quality alone. They'll consider a lot of other things, which would include 'worst case scenarios'.

But there's a catch here: I'd guess that a lot of people would buy a camera expecting a 'worst case scenario' and never actually get into one....

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2015 at 09:28 UTC
On article UPDATED: Real-world samples: Sony Alpha 7 II in Kauai (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: lets pretend for a second these photos are master pieces. Then the comments would probably read
"amazing photographer, he could have shot this with any camera, he waited a week to capture that shot, we want to see real life samples ......"
a knowledgeable photographer or enthusiast should be able to draw a few conclusions from looking at these nice and basic samples :)

Short version for what you said: people are never satisfied.

Or, an alternative way: people are just being... people.
:)

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2015 at 22:20 UTC
On article UPDATED: Real-world samples: Sony Alpha 7 II in Kauai (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

neo_nights: Let's face it: sensor technology has got to a point where you simply CAN'T decide between cameras based on image quality alone. Unless you pixel peep (which is expected from a gear forum, I know), a picture *well taken* with a Canon 1000D and a Sony A7 is negligible for most people's eyes.

So, while those galleries (by 'galleries' I mean: from all the recent cameras that have been posted on DPR) are nice to give SOME idea about a camera, it can't be the decisive factor.

"But higher ISOs and better dynamic range is still easier with FF cameras--even ones compressing raws like this Sony A7II."

No doubt. But then those would fall into the "specifics" of each camera, the different things that would, then, make the 'decisive factor' between camera X, Y or Z. Along with handling, focus speed and accuracy, lenses, support and lots of other things.

That is to say: people shouldn't get too hooked up or excited on those 'real-world galleries' here and start praising/bashing the cameras based on what they see here because that represents so little of a camera's true capacity nowadays.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2015 at 22:18 UTC
Total: 376, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »