jcmarfilph

Lives in United States Boston, United States
Joined on Jan 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 608, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Eye-Fi Mobi Wi-Fi SD card review (107 comments in total)

Still thinkin why the background is that fruit and not robot or no phone promotion at all but just the card itself.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2014 at 00:35 UTC as 11th comment
On photo Balluminaria in the YOUR BEST PHOTO taken with a SUPERZOOM Fixed Lens camera. challenge (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stevie Boy Blue: I like this image. Whilst I sympathise that some questionable voting may be going on (which is something I’m attempting to look into), it appears to be occurring only in a minority of cases.

Maybe, just maybe, some of those responsible for giving low votes here recognise this image from other challenges. Although there’s arguably nothing wrong with entering the same pic multiple times, I can see you’ve now used this (or a very similar) photo on five occasions.

Whilst you and I may feel it’s fine to do so, there’s an idea that some voters don’t like to see repeats and such people could be inclined to give low votes to specific shots just on that basis. Of the four challenges in which you’ve entered this image beforehand, you’ve taken 2 x 5th and 2 x 3rd spots, so 4th position here is something I wouldn’t be disappointed about. Well done.

That's a lame reason to give a photo with 0.5 or 1.0 vote. My photo did not win a challenge from the past. My best guess is someone doesn't like my photo to win or they are simply stupid voters.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 00:54 UTC
On photo Balluminaria in the YOUR BEST PHOTO taken with a SUPERZOOM Fixed Lens camera. challenge (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stevie Boy Blue: I like this image. Whilst I sympathise that some questionable voting may be going on (which is something I’m attempting to look into), it appears to be occurring only in a minority of cases.

Maybe, just maybe, some of those responsible for giving low votes here recognise this image from other challenges. Although there’s arguably nothing wrong with entering the same pic multiple times, I can see you’ve now used this (or a very similar) photo on five occasions.

Whilst you and I may feel it’s fine to do so, there’s an idea that some voters don’t like to see repeats and such people could be inclined to give low votes to specific shots just on that basis. Of the four challenges in which you’ve entered this image beforehand, you’ve taken 2 x 5th and 2 x 3rd spots, so 4th position here is something I wouldn’t be disappointed about. Well done.

There is no rule that you MUST not submit your photo from previous challenges and I don't see a reason why you must not because this photo is my best photo. I've been in this festival once and only once. If you don't like the photo then don't vote. I am not saying I could have won this challenge. I just don't like that some will give you the lowest vote to pull you down. I even gave 1.5 as the lowest vote in this challenge, 3x higher than the lowest vote my entry received here. Branding or personal history, you should take it aside and vote appropriately or don't vote at all.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 13:06 UTC
On Challenge:9198 (15 comments in total)

Great challenge but once again somebody got spanked by idiot voters. You don't vote the brand but the photo. You don't look at the exif and vote your favorite camera. You don't give 0.5 vote to pull down someone. It has been a great pleasure joining your challenges Stevie. This will be my last as I feel voting system is still full of magic.

Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 00:51 UTC as 1st comment | 3 replies
On photo Balluminaria in the YOUR BEST PHOTO taken with a SUPERZOOM Fixed Lens camera. challenge (8 comments in total)

My entry don't deserve 0.5 votes. I hope you are happy you stupid voters.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 00:13 UTC as 4th comment
On photo P1010542 in the YOUR BEST PHOTO taken with a SUPERZOOM Fixed Lens camera. challenge (4 comments in total)

Congrats! To those stupid voters who gave 0.5 to my entry, happy?

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 00:10 UTC as 4th comment
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)

MP is not enough considering the sensor size. 20MP should be fine with this one to allow cropping of distant subject.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 10:52 UTC as 122nd comment | 2 replies

Moto-slow and dark lens physically and technically. We are doomed Sony!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 10:34 UTC as 8th comment

If you want to be serious in photographic business, build a real camera that doesn't need lousy accesories. Why would I waste money on a phone cam with mediocre sensor and capabilities and spend hundred+ to make it half-decent camera.

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 01:59 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

John Miles: FZ50 rating (-3) http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52339583

A dedicated front wheel would allow instantaneous EV adjustment whilst the right thumb assisted in steadying the camera. A hot shoe for standard accessories does not appear to be present. The screen does not look to articulate to allow waist height composition.

The first Non Fuji 2/3" sensored superzoom camera of this generation. This camera has enormous potential, with broadly speaking double the typical superzoom sensor area. An excellent contender for the superzoom enthusiasts cash; a fitting "camera bag in a camera" release.

John, have you tried shooting with X-S1 or HS50? It will change your perception about what is best.

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 00:11 UTC
In reply to:

kimchiflower: Has anyone tried to shoot 1200mm at f/5.6 on a small sensor?

It cannot be pleasant.

How about f/6.5 from SX50 or f/5.9 from FZ70 at 1200mm EFL?

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 14:57 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: An F2.9-6.5 lens is not bright. Especially not with these tiny sensor cameras.

It is f/2.8 - f/5.6 and it is brighter than FZ70 or SX50 FWIW. Mid FL will go somewhere around f/4.x cross your fingers...

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 14:56 UTC

Even a 50$ P&S can trounce iPhone5s so I am not sure why even bother with that phone?

G16, X20, P7800 and many more pocketable premium cam will match or trounce Nokia 1020 and put the iPhone 5s back to children's toy bin.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 12:57 UTC as 77th comment | 5 replies
On article App turns your smartphone into a 3D scanner (6 comments in total)

Way better and more useful than instacrap photos and plastic filters for smartphone.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2013 at 02:10 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Lightstrap is a ring flash for your iPhone (9 comments in total)

Lets see, I will bring this ring flash, macro lens, telephoto lens, tripod, WA lens and many more plastic accessories.

Good Lord, I might as well bring a backpack for my iPhony's useless accessories.

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:28 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On article Is Instagram getting into the printing game? (5 comments in total)

What you are going to print a squared photo with horrible IQ and filters on a wood straight from your smartphone? =D

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 11:49 UTC as 3rd comment
Total: 608, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »