GaryJP

GaryJP

Lives in Hong Kong Hong Kong
Works as a TV Production, Directing, Shooting, Editing
Joined on Mar 11, 2006

Comments

Total: 933, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Valiant Thor: JPEGs show signs of obvious panametric defamulation.

Sorry. You are only allowed to say Canikon suffers from that.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 02:59 UTC
In reply to:

Chris2210: The only time I've ever encountered a similar contract was at an appearance of McFly during a day long festival. They also put a limit of first three songs [not that we wanted to hear more than that even through ear plugs]. As virtually all of us signed 'Adolf Hitler' or 'Mickey Mouse', good luck for their lazy exploitative management team [they didn't bother to check the photocopied 'contracts'] on enforcing those.

Sounds like possibly some confusion, maybe by their PR people. The standard musicians' arrangement for photographers and videographers (I've done it dozens of times) is that you only get the first three songs "in the pit" between the audience and musicians, right up against the stage. And then you get cleared out.

In festivals, there's usually nothing to stop you getting out among the hoi polloi to get your other shots.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 01:15 UTC

So I guess Taylor Swift will be accepting no free award show goodie bags and no longer wearing "loaner" designer gowns on the red carpet. After all, someone worked hard to make them.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 01:10 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

ThatCamFan: Late again canon, Sony just slapped you in the face with new models.

And it does not interest me. Sorry about that. I missed your election as representative for "most people". Sorry about that too.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2015 at 22:03 UTC
In reply to:

ThatCamFan: Late again canon, Sony just slapped you in the face with new models.

With less zoom range. Which is why I won't upgrade my RX100 II

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2015 at 00:44 UTC

I've always just shot progressive on a high shutter speed.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 12:37 UTC as 47th comment

Nice, but 24-70 means I'll stick with my RX100 II.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 10:05 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

UCSB: Without AF micro adjustment, this is just a frustrating waste of money. Anyone that owns any lenses or hopes to buy additional lenses in the future should not consider this camera. The front focusing example in the review is a perfect example of how every single one of your quality lenses will perform on this camera. The only question is just what will be the extent of the front/back focus errors ... one thing is clear at 24 MP, the focusing errors will be plainly visible.

I shoot Olympus OMD EM1 and GH4 with the Zuiko pro zoom lenses, and Canon 5D MkIII. Sorry, but I don't notice any greater focus accuracy on the Olympus or Panasonic.

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2015 at 09:23 UTC
In reply to:

UCSB: Without AF micro adjustment, this is just a frustrating waste of money. Anyone that owns any lenses or hopes to buy additional lenses in the future should not consider this camera. The front focusing example in the review is a perfect example of how every single one of your quality lenses will perform on this camera. The only question is just what will be the extent of the front/back focus errors ... one thing is clear at 24 MP, the focusing errors will be plainly visible.

The same one the Nikon D5500 is living in. "For the record, the Nikon D5500 doesn't support microadjustments either."

People SHOULD consider this camera. They should also check for variability of different models and RTFM which may not even be released yet.

I am not saying their final decision should be positive. Just that I'd need more evidence than a forum post on DPR.

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2015 at 03:33 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS R real world sample gallery posted article (443 comments in total)
In reply to:

DStudio: My first thought was the Sigma 50/1.4 doesn't compliment the camera well. They may measure great, but they don't look great.

But then as I looked at the shots with the Canon lenses, they don't look much better. Not 3D, flat, no life, no character or feeling that you could touch or identify with the objects, or that the images would touch you. I can pixel peep at the detail, and the detail's flat too.

It's not the subject matter or the weather - it's something else - je ne sais quoi.

"It's not the subject matter or the weather - it's something else - je ne sais quoi."

I DO know what.

It's the current obsession with dynamic range above all else.

I find it's even affecting my own work for the worse.

Sometimes you get more snap, more 3D, more life by NOT pulling everything out of the shadows and seeing every detail in the bright areas. But it's hard to get yourself out of the mindset that detail counts more than light or effect. So more and more we prize cameras by how close they look to HDR.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2015 at 00:43 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Sheila Murphy article (60 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aaron801: My kind of photographs. I much prefer this kind of work to so much of the mirrored water, craggy hillside, super-saturated color landscape kinds of stuff that it seems are so common on sites like this. Photo #2 is a particular standout for me... but then again, I'm a sucker for finely detailed B&W, modern architecture and diagonal lines.

It's funny, but it seems to me that the photographers who I tend to admire the most are much more likely to be using compact and mirror-less cameras much more than what seems to be the average (where DSLRs are easily the most popular). There's certainly nothing particularly distinctive about the photographs that these cameras make but the way that they're designed seems to attract a certain kind of photographer...

I rather find the opposite.

While not a huge fan of merely "pretty" landscapes, I sometimes find that even medium and large format cameras result in more considered images.

You seem to be just saying you only shoot with compacts.

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 01:01 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Sheila Murphy article (60 comments in total)

DPReview, please ignore the naysayers.

In the end the equipment is to serve the end of photography, not vice versa, and I for one welcome seeing more emphasis on photography on the site.

Due to the childish and unconstructive techno-nerd brand arguments I spend less and less time here and more on actual photography sites and it would be good to have more reason to come back more often. It is disturbing how some here seem allergic to actual photographs that are not of a test chart.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2015 at 00:31 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (3324 comments in total)
In reply to:

Deardorff: 50 MP - crippled dynamic range. Like buying a pickup truck with short bed to use on the farm. Stupid.

Most professional people in studios, with VERY high quality standards, know how to light for dynamic range. I've been shooting video and stills for years, with much worse dynamic range than we have now, and we always managed.

Like so many brand fanatics here, Deardorff is just exemplifying the Yiddish saying: "He who wants to beat a dog always manages to find a stick."

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2015 at 11:37 UTC
In reply to:

brian1366: Paid $79USD last night to download and install the STANDALONE version of Lightroom 6 Upgrade.
Sure Adobe isn't promoting the standalone version much and they put the link at the bottom of the webpage, but it wasn't that hard to find. A lot of whiners on here.

Is this guy STILL defending Adobe against its customers.? That's some dedication.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 23:32 UTC
In reply to:

Tal Shachar: it's going to be popular like rebadged Sony as Hasselblad. in other words - it's not going to sell.

Still no reason not to buy the Panasonic.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 10:29 UTC
In reply to:

Tal Shachar: it's going to be popular like rebadged Sony as Hasselblad. in other words - it's not going to sell.

Well the Leica rebadged Panasonic doesn't do so bad.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 08:22 UTC
On Interview: Canon's Chuck Westfall on the new XC10 article (347 comments in total)
In reply to:

prossi: Anyone with a functioning brain can tell that canon is just attempting to fragment the market into hyperspecific 'target audiences'. In essence canon is trying to create better customers for themselves rather than better products in the hope of selling more cameras. In some circles that could be considered pure genius if it wasn't for the fact that it's totally crazy.
The ideal canon customer has lots of disposable income, reads neither specs nor reviews, owns most of the canon catalog and 'reaches for' a particular product only under certain laughable circumstance created by canon marketing.

Brand hatred much?

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 06:06 UTC
On Interview: Canon's Chuck Westfall on the new XC10 article (347 comments in total)

I am a pushover for new cameras, but between my Sony AX100 and my GH4 (with Ninja Star), for once the "upgrade" does not look all that tempting.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 06:03 UTC as 20th comment
On Interview: Canon's Chuck Westfall on the new XC10 article (347 comments in total)

I think you meant "complementary".

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 06:00 UTC as 21st comment
In reply to:

Obleix: Why do people want to be in the photos anyway?

Take the damn photo of the scenery as it is... a memory for when you get home to your mindless life.

Anyone who takes selfies is an utter moron..

Yeah, well, I'll stick with the photographers in my list. After all, people have actually HEARD of them. And they actually put their images out there for judgement.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 00:00 UTC
Total: 933, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »