Tulaev

No. http://www.facebook.com/ulysses.photo/posts/485272984878339?comment_id=4241719&offset=0&total_comments=2

St.Petersburg, Russia. The first photos with my new RX1. About sharpness. This is 100% crop (about 4% of full frame), f/2.0:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51393267

http://www.eoshd.com/content/10248/sony-rx1-review-stills-camera http://www.riflessifotografici.com/english/sony-cyber-shot-rx1-english.html

I have it. RX1 fits with the effort. Not very convenient to insert and remove.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/759988-REG/OP_TECH_USA_7401044_Digital_D_Series_D_Shortie_Black.html

B+H filters are a bit larger than standard.

http://tashley1.zenfolio.com/blog/2013/4/leica-m-240-with-35mm-f1-4-fle---some-observations

Placed 39^th in the challenge. St.Petersburg, Russia

Interestingly, the official CIPA rating for RX1 - 230 shots, for X100s - 330 shots. Is consumption  so greatly increased in AF-C mode?

Maybe that's why he wrote: "Battery life sucks on the X100s, not a big deal, I have two spares on me when I am out." http://www.mikekobal.com/blog/?p=7235

"I have found  that the AF of the new X100s is about 2 times quicker than the X100 in good light (not scientific, just going by feel and memory). It is pretty much instantaneous  - aim, fire, bam!...

I'm going to buy RX1 but not at the prices in our country (about $4000). I am looking for other options. Why not read the reviews?

http://www.ronscheffler.com/techtalk/?page_id=188

Because I haven't bought any of these cameras but I'm going.

FF is still better. ;-)

http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-x100s-versus-rx1-an-unfair-comparison/Inflated ISO again?X100s - ISO200, f/5.6, 1/8   ISO6400 ,f/5.6, 1/250RX1 -  ISO200, f/5.6, 1/13   ISO6400, f/5.6, 1/320And RX1...

I can't say anything about X100s but RX1 is definitely better than this Leica:http://www.focus-numerique.com/test-1634/compact-leica-m-bruit-electronique-12.html http://www.reidreviews.com/

Why? It's shorter, but exit hole is much smaller.