If these filters are coated, the hardness of the glass or crystal is irrelevant -- it is the hardness of the coating that matters. Marketing fluff!
I get a kick when I see "Kodak" or "Zeiss Vario Sonnar" (hint: Sony lenses) or any other of the myriad of 20th-century brand names which have been licensed to Asian manufacturers, and then reviewers who assume there is some inherent product quality simply because the name has been licensed.
qwertyasdf: Voted...The Best High-end Compact Camera of 2014, which I've never owned or used.
@Prossi, I gather from your post that you are neither a scientist nor a historian. History is replete with examples of disastrous errors that were made due to faulty data. And skewed "polls" to bolster pre-determined agendas is stock-in-trade in political "science". The stakes are trivial here -- but data is often meaningless, and more bad data is definitely worse than less.
I agree -- meaningless data. Self-selected voters making choices when the vast majority of them have never even picked up most of the cameras in the lineup. Another excuse to advertise that you can buy these cameras on Amazon. DPR is sliding more and more towards advertising+chat.
Hasselblad: Hassle + blah = Bad.
justmeMN: Olympus just announced more financial losses for the Imaging division.
I guess they are going to cut costs by selling empty tubes, rather than actual lenses. :-)
An engineering sample is a functional unit that is built manually to verify the design. Pre-production units are built in small quantities, but using the manufacturing process, to verify that. An empty tube with an uncoated front element is neither an engineering sample nor a pre-production sample. Sloppy journalism.
What is a "Pride Parade"? Is it different from a Gay Pride parade or any other type of parade?
Why the "Please state the circumstances of your stay there."? (Stated twice in the rules!).
How do I enter a photo for consideration if I have not won a challenge?
What is a "large 1 inch-type sensor"? Is that different from a regular 1-inch type sensor? DPReview news coverage looks more and more like advertising.
barryhk: I think I understand this article.
Just thinking how is this related to the "exporsure" and "brightness" settings in Lightroom... I wonder in Lightroom, they are basically the same thing. i.e. increase exposure actually increase the amplification....
Am I wrong?
ETTR is always "possible"; it is a method for setting the exposure. And amplification of the signal using the analog amplifier before digitizing and recording the image (i.e. adjusting the ISO) often has a very different result from adjusting the "brightness" (a very fuzzy term) in post-processing. Among other differences, ISO gain is linear across the dynamic range of the image, whereas the various sliders that control "brightness" are intentionally non-linear. Another difference is that the noise characteristics are very different; the analog amplifier noise is essentially flat at a given ISO setting, whereas the round-off noise that is added by the digital manipulations in post-processing is significant for weak signals (shadows) and essentially zero for high signals (highlights). Lumping these very different adjustments into one "brightening" is causing some confusion among many of the readers, as evidenced by the questions.
The term "brightening" as it is used in this article is confusing and rather misleading, as it lumps together an adjustment that is made before the exposure is recorded (ISO), and adjustments that are made after the exposure is recorded (PP sliders). The difference is crucial for a variety of reasons related to both the technique and esthetics of proper recording+post-processing.
Can I use the new small flash on my G5?
Chris Noble: A full-frame vs. u43 comparison is silly. Far more useful and relevant would be a GH4 vs. Olympus E-M1 comparison.
Well, I read the more recent comments and I stand corrected.
A full-frame vs. u43 comparison is silly. Far more useful and relevant would be a GH4 vs. Olympus E-M1 comparison.
Good for you DPR for reviewing the cameras built into cellphones! Something that should be of keen interest to every avid photographer.
Interesting advertisement. We prefer impartial and comparative reviews.
Excellent idea! But please change the white-on dark & tiny font, it is very hard to read. I suggest dark on white, and a colored key outline. Thanks!
This may be obvious to most, but you don't need to generate all your profiles before that big trip to unusual lighting conditions. Take a ColorChecker target with you and shoot it against important or complicated backgrounds when you think you might need it. You can generate profiles as needed when you return, and then use them for the money shots.
bobbarber: OOC jpegs are processed, all of them.
You missed the point about what the software does. Did you read the article?