motobloat

Or maybe the metering just isn't 100% perfect all the time.  In my X100S review , I noted that the camera does screw up the metering occasionally - what I would call "total metering failures" like...

Agree with both.  Film is fine, but lets face facts - digital is here to stay and it gets better every year.  Meanwhile, more and more films are discontinued, fewer and fewer film cameras are...

I have the older Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS.  The new lens has a focus limiter, can be attached to Sigma's new USB lens dock, and has a different finish, but optically it is the same design as the old...

I arrived at this conclusion by reading the DPR X-Pro1 review (and some other reviews out there) and comparing out-of-camera JPGs with RAW files.  I didn't do it with my own camera and LR4.4, and I...

The answer is no.  It is the same as the old case except for the battery door flap.  It barely fits over the push-on lens cap, just like the old case.

Yeah he is way off.  If the Nikon D4, Canon 1DX, Nikon D800, and Canon 5DIII all can't autofocus down below -2EV, and there are only two cameras out today that can autofocus down to -3EV (Canon 6D...

This, or because the actual transmission (in T-stops) of the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is actually f/1.8.  Which works out to f/3.5 when you add two stops to it. The real question is - why are you using a...

I quite liked the photos on your website.  Good work.  I think you've got a good eye for landscapes.

Glad that they are updating the firmware. Hopefully they will continue to improve the X100s' functionality and flexibility.

I outlined most of the issues I had with my X100s in my full review...

Yes I've got all their blogs on my Google Reader.  (Well, I did until they shut down Google Reader, then I moved to Feedly). Well, first off, I never said I had a "hard time with flash" and I...

Fair comments here, and some good points made.  Thanks!  :-)

Thanks; yes despite the fact that I had a long list of both pros AND cons, I stand by my "Overall Conclusion" section.

Agreed.  We'd all love to focus accurately 100% of the time, that would sure be nice ;-)  To be fair, the camera DOES get it right at least 90% of the time.  Maybe more, depending on what light...

Really?  How do you tell the difference???  They all look the same to me. I guess someone is breaking Portland's "chickens are OK but no roosters" law.

DXOmark posted their review today: DXOmark full...

I take it you liked my review? :-D  I'm glad you found it entertaining. The image you posted is using "Dynamic Range 400", which limits your base ISO to 800, and no lower. I wonder why you selected...

And a few more from my second stopover in Portland Nice results in soft overcast lighting. Basically a single-frame HDR, done by underexposing about 2 stops to get the sky, then lifting the...

Use with off-camera flash You can read David Hobby's review (and his follow up articles ) if you want to know more. It works, it's cool, but with a 35mm-equivalent field of view, I don't know how...

So-called "Street" photography (i.e. walking around and taking pictures, but urban ooo...) Well, here is where the X100s really shines - travel and street photography. With a moderately wide-angle...

Image Quality There's not much to say here - this is the camera's strongest point. High-resolution, good noise control (perhaps because you can't turn it off), good colors and dynamic range, nice...