karlchwe: I don't want undiscriminatingly positive reviews, but this camera receives demerits because it has TOO MANY controls; they may "intimidate upgraders (EVEN THOUGH YOU CAN SAFELY IGNORE MOST BUTTONS..." (emphasis added.) Hard to see the logic there. Is it a problem just because the camera is priced like an entry-level DSLR? Would increasing the price solve the scary-controls issue?
DPR: please offer a response to karlchwe's post!
Slarpy: Seems like constantly writing to, and erasing from, a flash card would shorten its life tremendously.
Quite possibly the funniest thread I have read in 10 years...
JakeB: That is one ugly camera.
And yes, it does matter to me.
Those who have no eye for design have no business using cameras in the first place.
sykkys: I agree with you! I like the angularity a lot. Hate the look of the GH4. Wish JakeB could tell me which camera design he prefers!
Why is this not offered as body only!
lxcellent: Can someone please explain the 28mm lens choice by Leica? It seems so counter to what they have done in the past. I would expect a 35mm or even a 50mm. In fact, isn't easier to design an optically perfect 50mm than 28mm? It seems like Leica could have gone with a 50mm and one could add a screw on adapter to make it wider or more tele. (Which I realize is sacrilege for Leica.) What am I missing folks? The 28mm seems so unusual.
True painter. The only problem is that you need to be able to compose like this and I am not sure I have the skills to do this. I usually think about a shot, choose a lens, then take the photo. Now I have to think about a shot, take the photo while ignoring what I am seeing, then take the photo, then remember what I had in mind when taking the photo. The problem is that I usually shoot with a normal lens, so I would need to do some serious mind training.
I'm not sure I'm ever going to be convinced. After all cropping a 28 mm angle of view to a 50 mm crop factor is not the same as using a 50 mm lens in the first place. Noses look large relative to the whole face. To me, 50mm is the most versatile focal length. I did grow up with a Pentax K1000 with a 50mm f/2.0. I was trained to see the world that way.
Can someone please explain the 28mm lens choice by Leica? It seems so counter to what they have done in the past. I would expect a 35mm or even a 50mm. In fact, isn't easier to design an optically perfect 50mm than 28mm? It seems like Leica could have gone with a 50mm and one could add a screw on adapter to make it wider or more tele. (Which I realize is sacrilege for Leica.) What am I missing folks? The 28mm seems so unusual.
arhmatic: While video is secondary and probably sees little use, it's still unacceptable to see it falling so far behind every other camera out there.
I see that the video mode scored the lowest in this review. Needs a major step up for for X-T2
It's a "mutually exclusive" issue. If you want the great quality images from an X-Trans sensor, then you cannot have great video. It's that simple. Bummer.
Funny how Olivia is a beautiful woman who could clearly be the model and yet she is the photographer. I am sure that people think of me in that way when I am behind the camera...Not!
PascallacsaP: Looks great, as we have come to know from Fuji. For me, however, AF speed is going to be the decisive factor.
@BorisAkuninIn response to your post above, of course you are welcome to ask for me to be banned. However, if you figure out how to do it, might you let me know how you got it done as that is what I asked in my original message. Thanks and have a good evening.
I hope I don't get banned asking for this, but is there a way that I can ask to have yabokkie banned? He/she really is not constructively adding to the discussion. Just seems hell-bent on being negative about the Fuji-X system. Problem is, it leads to me doing exactly what I am doing now - getting distracted and off topic. Shoot.
Provia_fan: I can't understand the complaints about "retro" dials. I think the problem stems from the over simplification of designs over the years and the fact that people just want instant results, instant everything. In the old days you had to learn a given camera not expect the camera "to learn you". External controls are great and give you immediate control over features, instead of having to borrow into menus when you should be concentrating in picture taking. This is one of the reasons why I still love my Minolta 7D so much. Everything you need is one button or one click away, which is so much more logical. You learn the camera, you learn the buttons and you learn how many clicks for your exposure compensation, WB, etc and off you go. Not having to take you eye off the viewfinderto go into menus is a major bonus.
Caerolle: Indeed, you can be deliberate with any camera, but the 1D bodies don't put you in the mood to slow down. Let me put it this way: The Fuji bodies make it feel like I am more in control. It's like driving a manual instead of an automatic. There is no doubt that the automatics these days are far better than manuals at many things, but there is nothing that connects you to the car and the road like a manual transmission. Of course, I still get to the destination, but it is WAY more fun to use a manual transmission to get there. Not always convenient, but fun. This is how I feel about the X series. I feel more connected, I do slow down more, and my images are better. I could do this with my Canons, but those rigs don't encourage me to do so like my X-E1. Ahh...maybe it's all horse poop...
You do a different type of photography with the X series cameras and lenses. It's not about speed. It's about deliberation and creating a photo, not taking a shot. If I want a snapshot, I use my iPhone, if I want to shoot action, I use my Canon 1D series bodies. If I want to compose a shot that will reflect what I am thinking and seeing as an artists, then I use my X-E1. The dials are not about speed. It's about the process of crafting the photo with a tool that invites you to slow down and be creative and deliberative. By bringing me back to my film days with my Pentax K1000, LX, and 67, the Fuji cameras allow me to experience the photo making process all over again. A joy I had forgotten that I was missing.
lxcellent: Anyone else think this thing looks over-engineered. This is not the classic looking clean lines of Nikon manual bodies of the past. Too bad.
I do buy cameras based on looks. Of course that is not the only criterion, but I cannot imagine that anyone who is into image making does NOT buy based on looks to some degree. Aesthetics is our bread and butter.
Anyone else think this thing looks over-engineered. This is not the classic looking clean lines of Nikon manual bodies of the past. Too bad.
This is an ugly camera. I know that you should not judge a book by its cover, but why not make it look more like the classic rangefinder like they did in the LX1. Shoot. Follow Fuji's lead on this.
...and yes, the way a tool looks DOES make a difference!
So where is it? I am chomping at the bit. I am writing from the east coast of the US where it is 8:46 AM on the 25th. Anybody have it yet?
Sorry...for the X-E1.
Ganondorf: What the hell does un-damped mean??
It lacks the smooth (slight resistance) focusing rotation that we used to get when using manual focusing lenses in the the 1970s...
Chekr: @photo nuts
The fact is that kayone was not correct in his assertion. You being a sheep, jumped on the bandwagon and are now criticizing the author for something that he did actually get right.
You can apologize at any time.
I really urge you to apologize yourself, Chekr. Please. Your ill-conceived comments are embarrassing for humanity. I know that this sounds mean, but your comments are so baseless and rude that I don't know how else to respond.
lxcellent: If you are interested, I reviewed this camera over the weekend and posted my review here:
Given the drop in price of the X-Pro1, you also might want to read my review of that camera here:
Just changed it. Sorry 'bout that, bud.