shutterdragon

shutterdragon

Lives in United States United States
Works as a Entertainment
Joined on Apr 4, 2012

Comments

Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Love it, thank you, Fuji! The only thing you left out is the ability to develop RAW into TIFF in-camera. Why JPEG only?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2013 at 16:57 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies

I'm glad see that Nikon is back! Nikon used to make a lot of specialized products, such as Medical Nikkor, Noct Nikkor, whatever Nikkor, etc., for small markets with specialized needs. If you think this lens is expensive, then you're obviously not the intended consumer for this product. For those who actually require this lens, I know you are happy that Nikon even makes this lens. Any small production, specialized products would be relatively expensive.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 19:27 UTC as 21st comment
In reply to:

shutterdragon: I paid $1,700 for a brand new Noct f1.2 about 20 years ago when it was still in production. Been very happy with the results and I'm glad I made the decision to buy this lens since nothing else comes close to what Noct is designed to excel at. $1,700 was as much as my monthly salary at the time, by the way. If this new 58mm can perform as well as Noct, it's a great buy actually.

Hi SnapHappy32,

I have never used it on a DX body so I can't comment based on experience, but the Noct Nikkor does have light fall off toward the edges when used wide open. For this reason, you may get better results with a DX body, although I consider light fall off to be a character.

For concerts and events, I personally would not invest in a used Noct Nikkor since just about the only advantage of Noct over the regular 50mm f1.2 is the lack of coma flare. Coma flare is most visible when shooting point light sources that are small, e.g. city lights from distance, stars, etc. If you're close to the stage, coma flare would probably not be a problem.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 19:02 UTC

I paid $1,700 for a brand new Noct f1.2 about 20 years ago when it was still in production. Been very happy with the results and I'm glad I made the decision to buy this lens since nothing else comes close to what Noct is designed to excel at. $1,700 was as much as my monthly salary at the time, by the way. If this new 58mm can perform as well as Noct, it's a great buy actually.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 13:53 UTC as 31st comment | 2 replies

Finally!

I tried and the output result is mixed. While I like the color rendering on Aperture better than Lighroom, the detail suffers from color noise and other artifacts when viewed at the pixel level.

Adobe took many months to get it right, so I hope Apple keeps improving the algorithm. I think I'll hold on to Lightroom a little longer.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 18:03 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

I'm sure this feature is being developed in response to some needs, but it better not malfunction.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2013 at 04:12 UTC as 41st comment
On Leica M-Monochrom preview (449 comments in total)

What's the practical benefit of this B&W sensor if you're viewing the images on a color monitor with RGB dots? Isn't that kind of pointless?

Leica should go as far as making a super high res monochrome monitor to go with this camera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2013 at 14:38 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On Adobe releases Lightroom 4.4 and Adobe Camera Raw 7.4 article (50 comments in total)

Awesome news for those who use LR and X-Trans based cameras! But when is Adobe going to support the XF lenses?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2013 at 04:37 UTC as 27th comment | 8 replies

Better optics and AF - after 12 years and twice as expensive these are nothing to brag about. But the biggest issue I have with this lens is that the zoom ring is actually farther away from the mount than the focus ring, which is inconsistent with other Nikkor lenses that I own. This will mess me up. When I'm shooting, I want my gears to be invisible. Having to remember to grab the right ring is distracting. Consistent UI is important!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 15:26 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

padoods: wouldve preferred a 35mm equivalent lens

Ditto. Would have been a nice street shooter if it had a 35mm eqv. lens. The silver model does remind of the Contax TVS series which I loved, btw.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 04:46 UTC
On Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested article (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

shutterdragon: Welcome improvements! I still want Fuji to support in-camera TIFF.

Yes, I love how Fuji does colors. It's unfortunate that "Fuji color" is only limited to JPEG; where I live fog is very common and as everyone probably already know JPEGs result in a lot of banding when shooting fogs.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 02:04 UTC
On Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested article (137 comments in total)

Welcome improvements! I still want Fuji to support in-camera TIFF.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 01:35 UTC as 62nd comment | 7 replies

Curious if it has XF lens profiles.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 01:33 UTC as 26th comment | 4 replies
On Capture One Fujifilm X-Trans Raw support tested article (211 comments in total)
In reply to:

shutterdragon: Hmm, I'm not too impressed, unfortunately. If Fujifilm would only support in-camera TIFF....

The reason why I want TIFF is simple - I want Fuji color uncompressed. Even if X-Trans RAW is fully supported by the third party, I still want TIFF because I can't always better that Fuji blue and Fuji green when I develop RAW files. A dream scenario would be to have options for Provia/Velvia/Astia/Pro-Neg color options when developing RAW, but I guess that's too much to ask :)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2013 at 01:09 UTC
On Capture One Fujifilm X-Trans Raw support tested article (211 comments in total)

Hmm, I'm not too impressed, unfortunately. If Fujifilm would only support in-camera TIFF....

Direct link | Posted on Jan 14, 2013 at 15:29 UTC as 61st comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Jaryl: Why nothing for Fuji X-Pro 1? Is it later or never?

I have 500,000+ images on Aperture, but if Apple doesn't support the X-Trans by the end of the year I will ditch Aperture and go Lightroom.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 04:44 UTC

I love how Provia/Astia colors look, but there's currently no way to apply these color profiles during RAW processing. Too bad I can get these colors only on JPEG - I was really, really hoping Fujifilm would add a TIFF option. Maybe for v3.0?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2012 at 22:30 UTC as 9th comment

Awesome.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 11, 2012 at 02:05 UTC as 55th comment
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)

I bought the X-Pro1 with the 3 initial lenses a month ago.  The whole system is still lighter than the Nikon D3S body alone, which is still my main system for serious landscape and portrait photography.  

I had always dreamt of a Contax G2 Digital, and the X-Pro1 is dream come true for me.  The X-Pro1 closely resembles the G2 in many respects, and if you liked the G2, you will like the X-Pro1.  The AF speed is totally adequate and precise, and I feel that many negative comments around its AF performance are understandable but overblown.  Again, if you find the AF performance of the G2 to be adequate, you will feel the same for the X-Pro1.

Regarding its IQ, I've fell in love with its fantastic JPEG outputs - it's the first camera that I don't mind shooting in JPEG.  The image parameters are highly customizable too, which is great.  I shoot in Astia mode with shadow doen turned down a notch.

I do agree that the X-Pro1 is not yet a mature product, but I'm sure Fujifilm will continue to evolve it.  I'm already looking forward to the X-Pro2 and the new lenses they have on their roadmap!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2012 at 17:49 UTC as 39th comment

Nice lineup! I will be buying the 14mm and 23mm prime lenses for sure. I would also like to see two additional prime lenses - 10mm and 135mm (15mm and 200mm equiv). Now, that would complete my X-mount collection! The X system is my casual fun camera so I'm not considering zoom lenses. Nice job, Fujifilm!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2012 at 03:30 UTC as 42nd comment
Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »