KonstantinosK: I found myself spending more time reading about this than the D7200. Hmmm...
The thing is 1 metre is using the camera at half power so that may give dividends. The problem is I get more detail cropping my 55-210 lens on my Sony A3000 than I do with my Fuji HS50 at 1 metre and the combination is lighter. The Fuji is not known as the sharpest cookie in the tin so this new crazy camera will probably will get more detail and be good at least for bird identification at long range.Probably the images at not going to be the sort people will want to pore over with their electron microscopes in to the depths of the night, so that takes a lot of people here out of the market.
Master Yoda: Ridiculous . . .
You do not exactly explain yourself well Master Yoda. This camera can probably be a bit of fun to play which of course in the humourless, competitive world of DPR will probably not go down too well.
tonywong: Not ripping into Mr. Burrard-Lucas but I guess everyone will want their share of the drone photos before it gets commonplace and/or regulated. Since he spent a year in the area he likely exercised due diligence and caution regarding the welfare of his subjects but other photographers may not.
I am conflicted about the use of drone photography in wildlife photos. In the crush to get the closest and newest photos and perspectives that no one else has gotten yet, will the animals now be surrounded by a cloud of flying drones and wheeled remote buggies during an animal encounter?
It is bad enough to see multiple rows of jeeps surrounding a lion hunt in eastern Africa, but now everyone will have to contend with photoshopping out the remote cameras popping in and out of their photos.
I think that there may have to be a policy once these devices become commonplace and common courtesy is forgotten, and the animals will be constantly harassed by these devices.
The funny thing is that I lived in Africa for 3 years 61 years ago and most people drove around the game reserves in ordinary cars like Morris Minors.I find it hilarious watching all these intrepid explorers in their 4x4 SUV's.
Richard Franiec: The EOS M community has shown a good dose of support for original M (including myself), despite the scrutiny of the reviewers. That camera was a first stab Canon made regarding MILC segment. Not the best they could do, of course, but (unfortunately) in line with the ultra conservative and paranoid approach to every new product they release. New high MP cameras and M3 are the perfect examples of the scheme, it seems. Give it some but not all they can, and take some back.Exclusion of US market for M3 saddens me. I hope that Canon is not holding the grudge against the US M enthusiasts, following the harsh reception of the reviewers of original M and will reconsider availability of this camera in all markets.
The exclusion of the US by more than one manufacturer may be as a result of price resistance in the US. You are so used to getting everything ultra cheap so it may not be economic to supply in the US unless large scales of sales can be guaranteed.
I suppose everything imaginable is going to be available at some point (except a compact Canon with an EVF that is, let us not go too much in to the realms of fantasy).
Liberator: It is impress to have F2.8 in this compact caliber. Nice to have as spare but I still would go with my E-M5 using Pro 12-40 lens.
@electrophotoAn f2.8 lens is an f2.8 lens whatever sensor is behind it. f2.8 at 64.3mm does not sound too bad to me. Better than a lot of ILC lenses especially for a zoom.1" sensor cameras with this sort of reach have a price and a size to match. Horses for courses. None of these cameras are working any miracles in optics.
WetCoast: 1" sensor, please. No more 2/3", 1/1.7" or 1/2.3"... :)
But I was countering the conspiracy idea that they are hiding the sensor size by saying the information is actually on the camera. You only need to know the size of a full frame sensor and the much stated relative focal length and you have it all. Also working on actual focal lengths is more informative as it tells you how much of the sensor is being used as for example the LX100 which has a 4/3 sensor but is not using all of it as is not 2x crop.
@BarnETBut 1/1.7" does not really mean anything per se unless you are in to ancient television tube sizes and it seems a lot easier to divide 6 by 28 which does not even need a computer and gives you an actual usable indication of size relative to 35mm.
Olympus are not making a good job of hiding the sensor size as per Francis Carver as they print the actual focal length on the lens and dividing this number by the 28mm declared field of view gives 0.214 which says the diagonal measurement of this sensor is near enough 1/5 of that of a full frame sensor.
chlamchowder: At least batteries with poor contact are more manageable than ones that like to explode.
So you are saying that batteries that do not make contact are OK because if they do nothing at all this makes the camera safe. This does seem a do nothing and you can do no wrong philosophy. Surely it is just as safe not to buy the camera at all and this will save a lot of money without any loss of functionality.
Grumpyrocker: There's an advisory on the Canon UK site about this too.
My S120 has occasionally shown the "charge the battery" notice even with a full battery. So I suppose I should have it looked at.
@Richard Franiec.Seems a big deal if cameras are being released with long standing design problems constantly repeated in each iteration.You have to wonder if the boilers are still lit in the Canon organisation or are they just are rolling forward purely on inertia?
MPA1: Why is an insolvent company producing new products?
I suppose the choice advocated here by MPA1 and audijam is to fire everybody and close down the company straight away to save the investors unnecessary costs. This is not a lot of help to existing users of the kit either. I love these internet opinions based purely on the headline banner 'insolvent' without any thought or study in to the detailed situation or consequences or even what the word means.
tabloid: Real world..Personally as a full time professional photographer i would never go back to a SLR….its morrorless all the way for me.
I dont do sports, or fast moving objects….I photograph people.
Just a couple of reasons why mirror less is great : Focusing via the mirror/pentaprtism in a SLR doesn't mean that its in focus on the film/sensor plane.For me a digital SLR (with mirror) can't be used for view-back in bright sunlight.(please don't say put a hood on it).
SLR (with mirror): Constant overheating in video mode.
Ive set my Sony A65 so that when i take a picture, the image stays in my viewfinder for about 4 seconds so that i can see if what I've taken is acceptable, or if the person has blinked. Great for group shots, where one person has always blinked.Can do videos via the viewfinder. Can play back videos and stills via the viewfinder….great stuff.I could go on, but i won't, as people who own mirror less cameras know exactly what I'm talking about.
Your Sony A65 has a mirror and dedicated focusing sensors. This is not the sort camera being discussed here. I doubt if Samsung are going to go the SLT route.
The odd thing is with my NEX system I much prefer to use the 55-210 lens on my dslr shaped and sized A3000 which is inferior to the NEX6 in nearly every respect. This is because it is so much more balanced and pleasant to hold and compensates for the basic evf and focusing speed.I would think people before switching should try out the and make sure for longer focal lengths they enjoy the beer can on a credit card feel of mirrorless or I suspect in the case of full frame ale keg on a paperback experience.
Merel: It's amazing that most of top rated camera's (of course at higher price) do not include GPS. Almost everybody shoots extremely high amount of pictures during vacations, at locations often far away from home.
Eventually we all end up with those unavoidable questions" Darling where was this picture taken ? And this one ? Where was that again? "
So why is this GPS feature so neglected ? The DMC-GM5 (and others) would have been so much nicer camera in my list ! For that price, most people would expect GPS to be a standard feature or at least an option. Everybody might have it's own reasons, but on the subject I guess anybody will agree.
When showing your best pictures, what is the most common question you will get to answer ? .... " Waaow ! WHERE was this ? "
My Panasonic TZ60 with its GPS is great for holidays. I always carry a spare battery so battery life has never been an issue. It is really great to be able to look at the map in Lightroom and see all the travels of the holiday outlined.
Just been outside with my now fairly venerable Garmin 60CSx and this got a lock within 45 seconds. It has not has had any contact with anything but the satellites for years. Probably would take longer if the location is switched and it always helps if you tell it that it is a new location.My Nokia Lumia 1020 massively outperforms it though getting locks in trains where the Garmin gives up plus with Windows you can download the maps so no problem abroad with roaming charges. Probably it is helped by using the phone transmitters but the technology has moved ahead.
Why is the lack of built in flash a particular problem meriting a con with the Samsung NX3000 but not with the Olympus E-PL7?
photog4u: Nikon makes some pretty good stuff. And Canon,yes. But Sony is on FIRE! Fast AF with reliable tracking, well implemented focus peaking with magnification, legacy glass, smoking good EVF, FULL FRAME and now with FIVE AXIS IS! All for under $2k! "Despite the emergence of mirrorless cameras, the market is still dominated by conventional DSLRs" I doubt very much if you will be able extol that statement for very much longer.
Interesting that this is a discussion on consumer cameras and you are talking about a $2K camera. The big problem with mirrorless is that it costs a lot of money to get a model with a viewfinder. Putting an EVF in to a mirrorless seems to be a lot more expensive than the mirror OVF system.Entry level DSLR is just more affordable than mirrorless unless you are prepared to drop the viewfinder and of course DSLR comes with a vast affordable lens supply. I cannot see in these still struggling economic times a big rush in to a luxury goods sector which is where mirrorless is at the moment.
Greynerd: It is a pity that Casio have given up on the West with their cameras. It would be nice if at some time in the future if we could actually make such affordable high tech consumer products ourselves in the future but I cannot see this happening. The fact we cannot get away from these old imperial multiple number base measurement systems gives a hint why we struggle in the UK and the US for that matter.
@photoshackNot easy to buy in the West as far as I am aware. If you know an easy way to buy them in UK please tell. There just seems to be a trend starting where that the Far East have local markets for their products and are starting to find sufficient sales within their own markets and leaving us out. I do not think it is just labour costs as so much production is automated now. Not sure this system where we can live on credit to buy these luxury goods supplied from abroad will continue for ever. We may actually need to make stuff ourselves though we do lecture the Far East on these forums on how to do it.
It is a pity that Casio have given up on the West with their cameras. It would be nice if at some time in the future if we could actually make such affordable high tech consumer products ourselves in the future but I cannot see this happening. The fact we cannot get away from these old imperial multiple number base measurement systems gives a hint why we struggle in the UK and the US for that matter.