EricWN

EricWN

Joined on Feb 19, 2009

Comments

Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

RogerMuss: Seems crazy that all this magnificent craftsmanship that is built to last decades will be obsoleted in a year or so when the next sensor turns up. If Leica made a camera with a sensor module that could be replaced then I'd invest in the system.

Sure, Red might have one, but that's an even more rare and more specialised product to begin with, not your typical Full Frame stills camera - do correct me if I'm wrong.
The Ricoh idea was nice but in the end not the same as you bundle sensor and optics forever.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 09:25 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

RogerMuss: Seems crazy that all this magnificent craftsmanship that is built to last decades will be obsoleted in a year or so when the next sensor turns up. If Leica made a camera with a sensor module that could be replaced then I'd invest in the system.

@Fri
Yup, I am aware of the old wish to be able to just swap the sensor, I'm just pointing out that this hasn't made it to mass market anywhere else - so we cannot expect a niche manufacturer like Leica to make a technical leap across the field and provide a high tech solution where all others have failed/passed before.
On the other hand that doesn't mean that you can't enjoy a Leica for many years today, it's exactly like any other digital camera or computer: you buy it now and at some stage there is better performing stuff out there.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 06:58 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

seeblue: Although I often find a good smartphone to be a great substitute for a camera, I doubt this good camera makes a great substitute for a smartphone.

For the size and battery-life alone, I wager NO ONE will (or will manage to) use this as their single smartphone. Thus the single device argument falls flat. This is a large sensor compact camera trying to look and act like a smartphone. In the end, it’s an expensive, moderately powered device, with average handling and speed, designed for a handful of pixel-peeping RAW and resolution enthusiasts.

The smartphone which will come closest to conquering photography will come from Apple or Samsung; not from a camera maker. Apparently they’re taking their time. In a few years we’ll look back at the CM1 as a kludge.

@Papi - wow, what a low class statement, shame on you. I have in no way hinted at anything you claim. I am not discussing what is first on the market. I am simply looking at well thought out products. Looking at Samsung's watches and Apple's watches tells me all I need to know in that regard. One will be a well thought out product, and sell in millions, one won't. And sure, Casio had a digital watch before, just so to stop your next claim of copying.
How can you even seriously believe that screen size is an invention? That's just the way components develop and the market currently has a demand for bigger phones than before. Again, the best one will most likely sell the most, so just look at the most successful product. If you think the iPhone is only successful because it has a bigger screen, then let's meet again in a year and see how successful it has been then. Whatever else you speculate about you should better keep to yourself, nobody else will want that level of discussion.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 06:38 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

RogerMuss: Seems crazy that all this magnificent craftsmanship that is built to last decades will be obsoleted in a year or so when the next sensor turns up. If Leica made a camera with a sensor module that could be replaced then I'd invest in the system.

That would be the first digital M Leica that would not find a buyer on the used market then.
Seriously, while I appreciate the idea, no other Full Frame camera maker (not even the ones with much bigger budgets and very expensive DSLR offerings) have exchangeable sensor modules.
This looks like a very nice update to the existing Monochrome line to me, nice camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 06:29 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

R Stacy: Brilliant concept, though already showing signs of 2014 aging specs. Bring the screen, ram and storage up to modern spec and I'd strongly consider it. I don't care about 4k video, years off practical use yet.

Funny that some Samsung fanboys use this one again for some anti-Apple blabla. Totally uncalled for.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2015 at 08:09 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

seeblue: Although I often find a good smartphone to be a great substitute for a camera, I doubt this good camera makes a great substitute for a smartphone.

For the size and battery-life alone, I wager NO ONE will (or will manage to) use this as their single smartphone. Thus the single device argument falls flat. This is a large sensor compact camera trying to look and act like a smartphone. In the end, it’s an expensive, moderately powered device, with average handling and speed, designed for a handful of pixel-peeping RAW and resolution enthusiasts.

The smartphone which will come closest to conquering photography will come from Apple or Samsung; not from a camera maker. Apparently they’re taking their time. In a few years we’ll look back at the CM1 as a kludge.

What Papi means to say is Samsung will fear that Apple has some idea in that regard and will try what it can to do its usual low-class first to market product and hope somebody will like it.
As usual then, Apple will come up with a solution that its customers can actually use.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2015 at 08:06 UTC
In reply to:

photo perzon: Translation: Panasonic soon at $ 799

Translation: troll.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 07:40 UTC
In reply to:

bigdaddave: Yuck, rich man's plaything gets an upgrade

Thank you for demonstrating your envy.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 07:39 UTC
On DPReview recommends: Best smartphone cameras post (359 comments in total)
In reply to:

rramjit: Ridiculous review or comparison to omit the Note 4, unless it's because falls in the Phablet category. The Note 4 is the God of selfies. I regularly leave IPhone users gaping at my wide angle selfie.

Ya, antares obviously gets the new "trend". ;)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 30, 2015 at 16:23 UTC
On DPReview recommends: Best smartphone cameras post (359 comments in total)
In reply to:

rramjit: Ridiculous review or comparison to omit the Note 4, unless it's because falls in the Phablet category. The Note 4 is the God of selfies. I regularly leave IPhone users gaping at my wide angle selfie.

Oh, a device especially good for selfies.
Because that's what the world needs, more people shooting completely uninteresting close up images of their faces partially obstructing points of interest.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 30, 2015 at 14:31 UTC
On DPReview recommends: Best smartphone cameras post (359 comments in total)
In reply to:

Toccata47: This article either turns a blind eye or worse, reflects ignorance of phone photography to such a degree that one must question the authors authority on the subject.

There are an array of sites that have this subject well covered. If dpr can't be an authority in this space it should get out rather than erode brand confidence.

One vote for closing down Connect alongside gear shop.

Any actual real criticism you can provide in a constructive manner other than saying: me no like, like elsewhere better?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 30, 2015 at 14:28 UTC
In reply to:

drummercam: Market release, late 2015. DPR review thereof, late 2017 . . . as part of a "round-up." It's Pentax.

Terrible, these free services that are offered to you, right?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 02:04 UTC
On 3,200MP LSST camera gets construction approval article (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

petemod: By the year 2022 my phone will have 3.2 gigapixels.

Carrying a phone in 2022 will be so retro!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 07:33 UTC
In reply to:

Rick_Hunter: Oh for God's sake... why do they keep making these stupid gizmos like a phone was meant to be a proper camera? And who would be so stupid to use his phone's bluetooth for this thing, draining battery juice and/or precluding the use of more useful bluetooth stuff like a in-car handsfree or a headset? This is beyond me...

I'm not convinced that it's going to drain much battery. Bluetooth accessories have improved quite a bit over the years.
I also don't see why you can't pair with more than one accessory if needed. Lots of people use multiple things like Bluetooth earphones, car kits etc with the same device.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2015 at 22:55 UTC
In reply to:

Timmbits: Samsung's 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 with OIS is looking pretty good right now...

And Mike FL, again your comments do not make sense in this conversation. Just stay on topic, which is this lens and not what you read somewhere that somebody else used.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 16:10 UTC
In reply to:

Timmbits: Samsung's 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 with OIS is looking pretty good right now...

The artificial rage about so called trolling with the Parkinson comment is so far of the topic. Just don't call people trolls if their opinion differs and move on.
We don't all run after you to try to fix your "Apple-Xerox" rip-of theory, even if it's a tired old cliche.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 16:07 UTC
In reply to:

munro harrap: Nice, possibly well-made. Are its electrical circuits using proper tin/lead solder, or will it stop working like all the others do?

Come on it is 2015 and I think it is about time that photographers equipment became again as long-lived and reliable as it was before the EU and others decided to RoHS everything we spend money on, forcing us to repurchase over and over again. My kids are in their teens now, but in their lifetime they will have to replace their DSLRs and lenses 7 or 8 times unless something is done, killing the planet and exhausting natural resources in the process, not to mention the west becoming utterly dependent on those of China and Taiwan and Japan in the most unhealthy way.

Completely irrelevant EU bashing added to a lens hands-on. Btw with things like much extended consumer laws in many EU countries consumers are much better protected against manufacturers than in other regions. But that's really not the topic here.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 10:09 UTC
In reply to:

Sangster: This should be the kit lens packaged with the XT-1

Because every enthusiast wants to run around with a big f 2.8 zoom on vacation. Right.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 10:05 UTC
In reply to:

Timmbits: Samsung's 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 with OIS is looking pretty good right now...

Great, buy one then. Like all Fuji glass for their current cameras, this will be a very nice lens too.
Mike FL, I have no idea what you want to express here, not a single sentence of your post makes sense to me.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 10:02 UTC
On Leica M9 users report sensor corrosion issue article (378 comments in total)
In reply to:

boarderphreak: Always fun to watch the Leica bashers crawl out of the woodwork. Because you know, this has *never* happened to any other manufacturer. Sh*t happens. The real test is how the respective company deals with it. And deal with it they will (check back tomorrow).

I just hope they cover this issue for a couple more years or offer affected users some other fair solution. Covering a manufacturing defect / known issue with this visibility for three years is not good enough in my opinion.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 08:28 UTC
Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »