FYI, "Sam" isn't a "he" but a she --Samantha, maybe.
NB: **TWO** wasps, but on a tiny nest that insofar as I can see is unable to have yet held any adult (pupa) --the cells simply aren't big enough. This then indicates that these might be sister waps, one joining the other on her nest.
> $1300. What do you get for your money? Well, 'a new dot structure on the leather body trim' and a leather case with 'exclusive carrying strap'.
Wow, once again, Leica proves that they know what really matters in photography --who can doubt it?
burnin: All you need to know about this camera is that the case has a cut-out solely so the Leica label can be seen.
BRAVO for this observation and appropriate remark!!!
It says it all, so blantantly(as if pricing the D-Lux4 nearly double the Pany LX3--and providing a grip only as an option, for more money--didn't make the point equally clearly).
FOR $2500+ with FIXED zoom, I want that zoom to be FAST(-er than 3.5-5.6, common kit-lens for consumer cam.s speed)!
DPR, your comment below
> Canon's answer to the D600, the 20MP 6D, offers a slimmed-down feature set compared to its big brother the 5D Mark II but offers compelling features like built-in GPS and WiFi.
has the wrong model --should (now) be "Mark III", not "II".
And this Nikon guy casually suggesting that the D600 somehow sits nicely between the D800 & D7000 omits the serious hit a DX user w/DX lenses must take in order to be shooting FX!Yes, where IS the wanted "D400" !?
Nit: "Panasonic GF5 specification highlights"should read "... G5 ... ". (to repeat a prior post's similar alert)
Pentax Ricoh is listed as an exhibitor (yea!). [Google]
I'm also interested in what a similar shot would be like: move a little to the right, so that the lamps or perhapsbetter the rightmost edges of the lamp supports are in aline; would this then bring out a line on the left of thelamp posts!?
ps: I presume that aperture was f/5.6 not "56", and a littlesurprised that the shot is as deeply sharp as it is, given that.
Super shot. This is seen in Abstract, but suits even more aptlythe Winter Details challenge. How fortunate we are that youwere w/camera to catch this,thanks,-drofnad
... ........ ............. .. . . . . . . . . . . . s u b l i m e ! !
Wow, 8 seconds! With some filter or ... lighting?
This is a striking composition,and I'm also struck by the duration of exposure.
This image is much like the (color) one shown in theWikipedia entry for the derelict mill -- /slightly/ more tothe left (here), with decent foreground footing, and amore dramatic sky.(And I'm looking and thinking /Wow, a WA shot from the(viewer's) right side will capture a lot of vertical elements ... !/
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review