BartyLobethal

BartyLobethal

Lives in Australia Adelaide, Australia
Works as a Curdemudgeon
Joined on Apr 21, 2011

Comments

Total: 145, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Marco Bohr investigates 'hipster photography' article (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

Perry Kivolowitz: Meh. Every generation thinks they are cool.

Yeah, but only *mine* actually is...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2013 at 05:03 UTC
In reply to:

Madaboutpix: So beautiful, I agree. Down here on the ground, though, it sometimes seems to have become a considerable challenge to find plastic-wrapper-free wide-angle subjects! Let's work hard to keep this a hospitable, healthy, and aesthetically pleasing planet - we have only this one ...

It isn't just the ground. In a landscape image posted on DPReview recently I counted 13 contrails, making up the bulk of the cloud cover in the scene. Contrails are one contributing factor to a phenomenon referred to as 'global dimming', a decline in the amount of light reaching the surface. This is not just bad for photographers.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2013 at 08:15 UTC
On Ten items you should have in your camera bag article (288 comments in total)
In reply to:

M Lammerse: The list is a good start:
I usually carry also with me (which might be a tip for others)
- aspirin and several sticking plasters
- a note book and pencil (even in the digital age)
- small LED flashlight, using same batteries as my flashes
- sun or spare glasses

Depending on the event:
Presscard (usually connect it to my bag, important to not forget)
tiny folding chair
parts for a folding step ladder
gas mask
folding reflectors
specific flash diffusers
A small yellow (rain)coat/top with reflecting safety striping for in the dark

And I never ever carry my smartphone in my camera bag. I would advice no one to do. In case of loss/theft or confiscation of your camera bag you can contact those who you need to contact.

Your list is a good one, but a gas mask? Do you live somewhere there are frequent riots? Is a lot of your work done in sewers?

And why no Geiger Counter?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2013 at 08:29 UTC
In reply to:

Alec: We got the landscapes with empty dresses. Means some other site got the nudes!!

Yeah, but they are decaying nudes, so we got the better deal.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 03:56 UTC
In reply to:

TomCreek: I'm guessing she's from back east, NY, Vermont maybe...no self-respecting Montana native would have time to produce this self-absored drivel.

I'm surprised a "self-respecting Montana native" would have time to post insular opinions on a photography website.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 00:44 UTC
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: I'm gonna photograph cat poop with different shapes and textures in different environments and perspectives and get famous. The sky is the limit!

Any subject matter can be photographed in interesting ways, and if you were an adventurous photographer you probably could make a name for yourself with your "cat poop" images. But the way you have written your response indicates that you are a 'conventional' thinker who will probably only ever produce 'conventional' images. Safe, boring and like the overwhelming majority of us, destined for obscurity.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 00:37 UTC
In reply to:

Jeff Peterman: Why isn't there an easy to click on link that takes us to the original site? (Or if there is, where is it?)

As for the lake being a "lake of blood" - if so, what about the green lake? I'm pretty certain that the water color is simply from minerals in the water, not "animal products".

The green colour is cyanobacteria feeding on the nitrate-rich waste expelled by the cattle. The bacteria suck all the oxygen from the water, leaving it toxic and dead. "Minerals" have nothing to do with it.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 22:35 UTC
On 5 Reasons why I haven't used my DSLR for months article (591 comments in total)

Good article. I think I have one more 'large' camera left in me. By the time I'm done with that, 'small' cameras will have improved even further. Then I might 'go small'.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 23:55 UTC as 87th comment
In reply to:

Hugo808: It must be rubbish! You just don't like bad news! Review some decent cameras for a change!

Huh! Some attempt! Other than you fail to say about the PRICE of fish!! And RANDOMLY use the HATS LOCK buttern!! I expected better SAtire than this!!! And you spelling is APALLING(ly good, and so not fit-for-purpose). Come on Hugo! Pull your socks up!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2013 at 09:59 UTC
In reply to:

whtchocla7e: Finally, a dual pixel sensor!! Looks like the MP war is over. This brings back fond memories of 4 bit computer graphics. I can't wait to see what this beast can capture with 2 pixels.

Where will it all end? 8 pixels? 16? Madness!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2013 at 00:38 UTC
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Is it just me or is Marissa Mayer insanely cute?

Works for me.

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2013 at 21:09 UTC
In reply to:

Jabs767: Cloud? What's that?

First you have to have reliable internet connection which for me is not possible and this reliance by software manufacturers/developers on such technologies might be alright in the US, but not all parts of the world have the same systems.

It takes a whole day recently to download/update my Mac OS! Not every professional photographer works in big US cities or even the big studios in Australia. They seem to have forgotten a large portion of their market and are concentrating on the 'big' customers.

Adobe already charge nearly twice as much in Australia for their products than they do in the US.

It looks like I will be using Nikon's CNX2 and Capture One Pro more now when Nikon deliver new cameras that ACR won't open the RAW files on.

I went and looked at the US, then the Australian prices for subscription to Photoshop alone, and they are both $19 / month, or AU$240 for Photoshop for a year. You could subscribe for 4 years and still pay less than the boxed version of Photoshop we were being asked to pay previously. We *finally* have something akin to price-parity with our US cousins, so I'm happy about that.

Your comments about the variability of internet connections / speeds across the country are spot on though. I'm good at home, where I have ADSL2+, but when I go to visit family in Broken Hill I will be up sh*t creek in a barbed-wire canoe (without a paddle).

I guess you'll be voting for the party that supports the NBN fibre-to-the-home solution in September?

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 00:24 UTC
On Photographer turns camera on teenage 'freighthoppers' article (189 comments in total)
In reply to:

DenWil: So one person riding the rails illegally photographed others riding the rails illegally. Safer than being a Christian missionary in Iran or N Korea where you go to prison when you're caught.

Also less destructive than attempting to replace one lot of counter-productive dogma with another.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2013 at 01:07 UTC
In reply to:

BartyLobethal: These are all welcome changes, particularly the improvements to the Healing Brush and the addition of radial gradients.

If the upgrade is US$99, then I guess I'll be asked to pay AU$150 or AU$200 so that Adobe can provide me with their "bespoke customer experience". This is what they called it at the recent federal senate enquiry, we consumers simply know it as the Australia Tax. Will have to keep my eye out for specials, or work out how to implement the 'VPN workaround' recommended by Choice.

BaldCol, what you're apparently missing here is that we have to pay more for exactly the same product. It's not so much the price Adobe are charging, but the higher price Adobe are charging Australians. The senate enquiry found that Aussies were paying up to $1000 more for Photoshop than folk in the U.S. Our dollar has been consistently over parity with the US$ for some years, and this market-specific surcharge is simply greedy gouging. Bespoke customer experience my butt-hole.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 09:58 UTC

These are all welcome changes, particularly the improvements to the Healing Brush and the addition of radial gradients.

If the upgrade is US$99, then I guess I'll be asked to pay AU$150 or AU$200 so that Adobe can provide me with their "bespoke customer experience". This is what they called it at the recent federal senate enquiry, we consumers simply know it as the Australia Tax. Will have to keep my eye out for specials, or work out how to implement the 'VPN workaround' recommended by Choice.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2013 at 21:39 UTC as 56th comment | 5 replies

Will the Laotian workers be paid a fair wage, work under fair terms and conditions and be treated with respect?

Frankly, I don't want $50 off my next camera if someone else has to go through life like a battery hen because of it (assuming Nikon won't simply pocket the difference).

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 08:47 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

lmtfa: They had to because of the swarm of enviro nuts pushing their bs globule warming on us.

Back to Laos. You can can train anyone to sit in a production line to assemble parts. Difference between doing it in the West vs East is the stinking UNIONS.

"Globule" warming? I'll bet your major problem with the concept is your lack of ability to conceptualise...anything.

Surrounded by 'enviro nuts' and 'stinking unionists'? Suicide's probably your best bet. Ciao.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 08:43 UTC
On Nikon issues service advisory on D600's dust issue article (240 comments in total)

Even allowing for the fact that 'noise' gets amplified on the interwebs, this issue has made me reluctant to purchase a D600. There is very little useful information in this advisory, although simple acknowledgement of the problem is welcome. I would like Nikon to put a number on it. If they could say, "20% of customers have experienced this issue" or whatever the actual number is, that would at least let us know the scale of the gamble. Even at 20% (I'm just making this number up) I would be more rather than less inclined to go ahead and get one. The main dissuader has been Nikon's silence, and simply not knowing.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 23, 2013 at 00:19 UTC as 72nd comment | 2 replies
On Nikon issues service advisory on D600's dust issue article (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

daciangroza: I do architectural photography mostly at f/8-f/11 with a D600 and even though oil spots are visible in the top left corner when shooting a white wall, I have never had a problem with them in real photos.

I'll send the camera in sometime for cleaning and I'm curious if they'll show up again. My guess is that they won't. From what I read the shutter splutters oil on the sensor when the camera is new and stops after the excess oil is off the mechanisms. I don't worry too much about it, I found imperfections in all my gear. Nothing is flawless, unfortunately.

It seems that Nikon's loss is Copper Hill's gain.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 23, 2013 at 00:12 UTC
On Nikon D600 Hands-on Preview preview (713 comments in total)
In reply to:

avbee: "can't adjust aperture during movie recording." that's a big problem... As I know, that D600 has to turn off the Live view to change aperture. How about use viewfinder instead of Live view? Can we adjust aperture with Live view off and use the viewfinder?

The mirror has to be up to take an image (for both stills and video), so you're not going to see anything through the viewfinder.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2012 at 21:40 UTC
Total: 145, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »