Deeso

Deeso

Joined on Feb 7, 2012

Comments

Total: 56, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)
In reply to:

mosc: Don't film Nikons go 1/8000s like the D4 this thing's guts are supposedly from?

Processing and sensor... no D4 shutter it seems

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 14:47 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review preview (507 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo nuts: I don't understand. This is the best camera in its class, but only received the silver award. Why? Sure, it has its flaws but there's nothing better in its class (similar size and weight).

Perhaps because of the price bump

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2013 at 08:29 UTC
On Canon videos showcase 70D's innovative AF system article (145 comments in total)
In reply to:

Deeso: So this innovation is more useful to videographers than photographers...

Thanks for make it clear :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 19:23 UTC
On Canon videos showcase 70D's innovative AF system article (145 comments in total)

So this innovation is more useful to videographers than photographers...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 05:42 UTC as 29th comment | 5 replies
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Preview article (107 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: G5 is very well and new... already GH-3 was lauched. ... now G 6... why hurry ?

Not just panasonic but all the producers really.

Except for the Canon 450-500-550-600-650D... :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 22:09 UTC
On Nikon posts sample images and video from Coolpix A article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael_13: Great sharpness and no visible noise, but one thing bothers me:

Skin colors. Especially lips look very artificial to me.
So far I've only known this problem from Panasonic.

That happens when you take pictures of pale redheads in winter :V

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 22:12 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 Hands-On Preview article (311 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: The movie button is relegated to the top front beside the shutter button and is alarmingly smaller and difficult to operate.

It was perfect on the D7000.

Why change things around just to say it's an upgrade?

In this case, ERGONOMICALLY, it is not. It's now more difficult to make movies with this thing. The LV button and Movie button are miles apart...

.

Indeed. We rather have an ISO button where the movie recording is now.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 16:16 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 Hands-On Preview article (311 comments in total)
In reply to:

chillgreg: Ren Kockwell:

" it won't make much, if any, visible difference at less than 6-foot (2-meter) wide print sizes, and only if you use the very finest NIKKOR lenses and technique."

" Readers tell me that their Sigma 105 Macros don't work on the D7100."

" It's pretty much the same as 2010's D7000,"

" There's also an inexplicably silly 1.3x crop mode"

" Only the 15 central sensors can see horizontal lines ('cross type'), the rest only see vertical lines, just like the single focus sensor of the Nikon SP of 1956."

" The extra resolution means nothing in actual shooting"

" The D7100 and D700 are pretty much the same."

" If you've found the time and expense I incur to share all this for free... "

What a f#@$ing tosser.

Greg

Ken is master of contradiction he judges de camera at the start of the article then he ends

"The D7100 is so new that no one's seen a production model yet. Seeing how the D7000 is the best DX camera Nikon's ever made (I own one myself), I'll presume that the D7100 is more of the same great thing."

So basically you can dump the rest

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 16:02 UTC
In reply to:

marike6: Nikon pulled out all the stops on this update. I'm sure some will still desire a D400, but it's hard to imagine a nicer DX camera specs wise.

Weather sealing, no OLPF, AF to f8 means my using TCs with my 70-200 f4 VR. Nice.

IQ should exceed the already superb D5200 and if video quality is as good as the that camera, it's going to be a monster all-around DX shooter.

Looks like my other body is getting a baby brother.

You are right. There's always certain envy on fanboys when their brand fail to deliver a 100% perfect product. But hey. I'd be perfectly fine with the D7100, I'm not a sports journalist anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 13:53 UTC
In reply to:

marike6: Nikon pulled out all the stops on this update. I'm sure some will still desire a D400, but it's hard to imagine a nicer DX camera specs wise.

Weather sealing, no OLPF, AF to f8 means my using TCs with my 70-200 f4 VR. Nice.

IQ should exceed the already superb D5200 and if video quality is as good as the that camera, it's going to be a monster all-around DX shooter.

Looks like my other body is getting a baby brother.

While it's quite safe to assume that the D7100 is a killer camera for landscapes, portraits and city shooting, with 6fps and a relatively small buffer is hard to see it as a full replacement for the d300s. Sports shooters still have to look for "deprecated" models like the D300-D700 because the only model able to shoot over 8fps maintaining focus accuracy (D4) is way too expensive unless your news agency pays for it.

A D400 is still necessary for nikon even its is classified as niche product because Canon will unveil rather soon a 7DmkII which will be a speed demon. Very likely a "baby 1DX"

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 12:16 UTC

Now that there's a truly compact zoom the NEX series is starting to find the right balance.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 20, 2013 at 07:26 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

Hinder: Is the human eye even capable of discerning between 1080 and 4X?

In a 85'' for sure. And by the way. Can you discern between what's on your HDTV and what's around it?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 08:40 UTC
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: The big question is - Do we really need 4k and 8k resolution at home ??

It depends on the size of your screen. Of course for wall sized displays (hence this 85'' set) it might be useful. Hardly for 40'' or smaller displays which can settle with 2K or 1080p..

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 08:37 UTC
In reply to:

TheEye: People still watch tv?

I don't know. Do you watch movies, or concerts? It doesn't has to be broadcast, you know...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 07:38 UTC

Wasn't the commercial name of the stacked CMOS desing "EXMOR RS"?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 06:57 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply

Funny how these cameras get bashed while Point and Shots of similar size and price get praised.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 08:34 UTC as 17th comment | 5 replies

I wonder how well the new sensor performs

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 07:23 UTC as 20th comment

A really compelling product. Fuji is taking some risks (X-Trans RAW support is still a work in progress) but thankfully they are pushing the market beyond the Canikon dominance. Those will still lead the market for a good while but I hope Fuji's brave stand makes them push some more innovation in the enthusiast range.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 22:43 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Deeso: Very interesting little camera, except for those who want the DOF control only a bigger sensor can bring.

I'm just stating that's the only thing that prevents me to get that camera because I find the rest of the feature set really appealing. For the same price there's some cheap m4/3 and APS-C mirrorless cameras that could fill the bill in regards of DOF (you don't have to go for FF)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 22:23 UTC

Really hard to see any relevant improvement over previous generations.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 22:00 UTC as 4th comment
Total: 56, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »