NZ Scott

NZ Scott

Lives in New Zealand
Works as a Hiker, writer, educator, photographer
Joined on Jul 29, 2011
About me:

Formerly a news reporter for three daily newspapers in New Zealand and later a communications and language specialist based in South Korea and Malaysia. After a 10 year working holiday, during which I backpacked through 75 countries on six continents, I am currently hiking the 3000km Te Araroa trail in my home country, New Zealand.
My latest work of fiction can be viewed here:
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/444160

Comments

Total: 520, showing: 181 – 200
« First‹ Previous89101112Next ›Last »
On Challenge:9602 (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

JerryShots: I'm surprised some posters can breath with out assistance.

Funny, if you ask a Mexican, Costa Rican, Honduran, Salvadorean, Ecuadorian or anyone from almost anywhere, where they are from none will EVER say "I'm an American" because they are all so eager to display National Pride - But say "I am an American" or in this case "American Made" and boy howdy will all those non-Americans jump up to tell you how American they are - LOL
When's the last time you saw an foriegn made consumer product on "The American Market" that didn't have it's Country of Origin proudly displayed? When have you seen a Mexican product labeled as "American Made" or "Made in America"? What you do see is "Henche en Mexico" or "Made in Costa Rica" or "Made in Honduras"...You ever seen a peach with a sticker on it that said "Product of Chile"? If you do, don't eat it because it will suck. If they could put a sticker on all that foriegn fruit that said "Grown in AMERICA" - Don't you think they would???
Eat that.

You're thinking of the USA mate, which is somewhat distinct from "America".

I have Candian friends who consider themselves American but who lament the fact that they cannot say so because people will associate them with the USA.

Posted on Jun 30, 2014 at 07:14 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1980 comments in total)
In reply to:

Beckler8: I'm pleased others here are also talking about 4K video. HD-only can't really be justified on a top-end SLR and especially when 4K TV's are now readily available. Essentially you're forced to decide whether you want higher quality video or stills (i.e. GH4 or D810). Who will be the first to have both? (Not counting Canon 1DC because of 10k price.)

The best cheaper option for 4k is the Panasonic GH4 at around USD $1700.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 14:19 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1980 comments in total)
In reply to:

jaaboucher: The original D800 is a huge pain for daily news shooting. The insane file size and slow frame rate makes sports a pain and slows down the workflow in every part of the newsroom. Thank god Nikon put some thought into what journalists actually need, maybe people will upgrade their D700s.

Actually, most "poor journalist photographers" steer clear of full-frame altogether and shoot APS, M43, digicams or even phone-cams.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 14:08 UTC
On photo Under Attack in the 1:1 aspect ratio: Travel photos challenge (2 comments in total)

Thanks.

Yeah, they were pretty close. Maybe 50 metres (50 yards).

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 05:58 UTC as 1st comment
On Challenge:9750 (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

NZ Scott: I've been to every single one of these places!

Regarding Yukatan. 1) You've spelt it wrong - should be Yucatan. 2) Yucatan is not a man-made wonder. It is a state in Mexico. There are some very nice ruins in Yucatan (e.g., Palenque, Chitzen Itza), but Yucatan itself is not a man-made wonder.

S

I wasn't criticising, just pointing out the mistake. It mentions Chichen Itza now, but didn't before. Maybe you could be a little less quick-draw in your criticism next time.

Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 00:37 UTC
On photo Kaleidoscopic Kleptomaniac Kea in the -Colorful Birds- (Full Colours Only + Border) challenge (4 comments in total)

This is one of the best photos of a kea I've ever seen.

Well done, mate!

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2014 at 10:23 UTC as 3rd comment
On Challenge:9750 (4 comments in total)

I've been to every single one of these places!

Regarding Yukatan. 1) You've spelt it wrong - should be Yucatan. 2) Yucatan is not a man-made wonder. It is a state in Mexico. There are some very nice ruins in Yucatan (e.g., Palenque, Chitzen Itza), but Yucatan itself is not a man-made wonder.

S

Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 03:24 UTC as 1st comment | 3 replies
On Challenge:9602 (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

gerry328: An iPad is US-branded but manufacturing is subcontracted in China, does it qualify?

Conan: Don't forget that there are dozens of countries in America - USA is only one of them.

Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 00:13 UTC

Nice shot. I knocked you down half a point for not writing a proper title.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2014 at 01:37 UTC as 1st comment

That's a beauty, mate. Nice shot.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2014 at 01:34 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On Challenge:9691 (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

NZ Scott: Having been to Rio de Janeiro and Victoria Falls, there is no way I would consider them to be among the world's greatest natural wonders. Still, it should be an interesting challenge.

I think the list given above comes from Wikipedia. Wildbegonia: I agree with you about Iguazu being the world's greatest waterfall - I visited it in 2010, and then last year I visited Victoria Falls. No contest! I think that if I were to compile a "7 Wonders" list from places I've been to I would have Iguazu Falls, Halong Bay and Perito Moreno Glacier on there. But that's just me ...

Posted on May 31, 2014 at 01:28 UTC
On Challenge:9602 (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

c76plus: A product made in any of the 53 countries recognized in America?

c76plus: America comprises the two continents of North America and South America. You can enter photos from any country that is part of those two continents.

Posted on May 31, 2014 at 01:10 UTC
On photo Head-On Of Bee in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (8 comments in total)

Nice shot, bro - I shoot macro myself, and I know how difficult it is to nail these photos.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 09:50 UTC as 6th comment
On photo Bisheh Waterfall in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (3 comments in total)

That's a beauty, mate.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 09:47 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Pallke: This is very useful for morons that protect their costly lenses by filters and deteriorates the optical quality...

Pallke: For a guy who said he was going to sign off several posts ago, you sure do a lot of talking. Theoretically, there is some merit to what you say. In practice, there isn't.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 15:02 UTC
In reply to:

Pallke: This is very useful for morons that protect their costly lenses by filters and deteriorates the optical quality...

0MitchAG: You would think so, wouldn't you? But that is not always the case. I shoot with Micro Four Thirds lenses, and one of the major manufacturers (Panasonic) does not coat its lenses to remove purple flare. A lot of people are using filters on the Panasonics to remove the flare, even using complicated mods on the 7-14, which doesn't normally take filters.

Also, I recently did a sharpness test with one of my Olympus lenses (the 75-300 II) and it was SHARPER with a B+W MCR Nano UV filter attached than it was with the filter removed!

Link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 15:01 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): As someone who's tried to get sea spray off of a multi-coated filter, taking countless lens tissues and eclipse fluid...

...and who's had to try to clean elephant snot (or whatever it is that comes out of an elephant's nose) when it snorts a foot or two from your ultra-wide angle lens, depositing disgusting slime on the front element of a 17-35mm zoom...

I here and now demand that Nikon create a retrofitting service so I can replace the front element of the half-dozen lenses that I use the most.

I shoot a lot in bad weather, worry about the image first and gear last, and swore off UV filters long ago other than when I know I'm going to be in a lens coating risky situation, like shooting in the surf. Whatever fluorine coating adds to the cost of the lens, I'll sign up for, because it would give me back hours of time every year.

I have a friend whose 2 year old recoated one of his lenses with crayons and Sharpie marker who'd probably sign up for the coating too.

I get no artefacts or flare of any kind with the B+W MRC and nano-coated filters, even shooting into the sun - and I've tested them plenty of times.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 14:54 UTC
On Challenge:9691 (10 comments in total)

Having been to Rio de Janeiro and Victoria Falls, there is no way I would consider them to be among the world's greatest natural wonders. Still, it should be an interesting challenge.

Posted on May 25, 2014 at 01:40 UTC as 1st comment | 5 replies
On article Street photography tips with Zack Arias (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

SeeRoy: Street photography in Marrakesh is one thing, they've been saturated with tourism for 50 years or more - you might get a shockingly different reaction if you tried it in Fez.

I've shot street in Marrakesh and Fez. No difference, really.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 01:14 UTC
In reply to:

vroy: This is very useful for morons that wouldn't protect their costly lenses by filters.

I use UV filters on my expensive glass, but not on my kit lenses. A few months ago, a filter saved the front element of a $600 lens. So that's pretty much justified all the coin I've ever spent on filters, and then some. The best thing about filters is that they keep the coatings on your front element pristine - worth it when the time comes to sell.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2014 at 13:26 UTC
Total: 520, showing: 181 – 200
« First‹ Previous89101112Next ›Last »