Steve Sanacore: How do you prevent light from getting behind the filters? It looks wide open on top and on the bottom of the holder. I've used the Lee filter holders for years and had to tape off the top and bottom to prevent flare from behind. But this is a much larger area to block.
So Bohus, YOU designed the technology? I can confirm this.
Lishuai Edgelights are OEM'ed as Flapjacks I believe.
Fotodiox is a US branding of an Asian product.
kryten61: Pentax is not a sports camera, so why would you? The big advantage Canon and Nikon have over the Mirrorless camera's is focus tracking for sports shooter. Pentax would offer no advantage, so that said, An A7 is far more attractive. Any lens is available to you with a Mirrorless camera. These high res sensors are more than is needed for landscape rather than needing pixel shift especially at real world print sizes and outputs, I would rather have the lens choices than Pixel Shift. Sorry, this camera is about brand sentimentality rather than making any sense for a new buyer. I am sure it will handle well, be well made, and feel good to use, but all too late I reckon, Would have been better making a proper mirrorless camera but considering the real tech in the A7RII, Ricoh Pentax would struggle to catch up. This camera will make a few Camera Clubbies happy but cannot see it grabbing a new generation of shooters which is really what Pentax need, to be relevant.
I totally understand pixel shift was using on a Blad 7 years ago. Do you understand it? Please enlighten me how you will use your pixel shift on your next everyday photo shoot, then tell me how many lenses Pentax have that actually are capable of showing much improvement with it? Pixel shift is fine if you have no movement in your landscape, So product shoots mainly? So thanks for making my point for me. Also what Pentax lens design was Tokina using when they made the Pentax 16-50 F2.8 lens for them???
"rather than needing pixel shift especially at real world print sizes" Sure, who needs sharpness and true to life color reproduction. " Ummmmmmmm??? Anyone who has bought a Sony A7RII or D800 I suppose? And they even have a large choice of sharp lenses to use. Oh and they can capture these images in a micro second rather than 4 exposures, This means a wedding shot, a wildlife shot etc etc, Pentax pixel shift.....LOL Great for a desert landscape on a windless day hahahaha awesome.
"Yes yes, Pentax is doomed for the past 15 years now?" used to work for them when they were Pentax, not Ricoh, you know when the were so strong that they thought of Ricoh as a second shelf brand. Compared to how strong they were back then, they are now irrelevant and very much a niche brand. Strong smell of Naphthalene in this forum :-) Samsung had more market share than Pentax and they are pulling out, so what is your definition of "Doomed" (your quote not mine)
Penatx have more lenses? LOL, you mean more lenses made by Tokina for APS=C? "Any K mount or M42 lens is available to the future owner of K1." Thanks for stating the obvious , how is this any comparison for taking ANY lens on the Sony?. "Oh those poor fools buying 50+ Mpx digital MF cameras, if only they knew that 24 Mpx is enough!" What's your point? So how does pixel shift work with anything but an absolutely static image (still life?) Sorry mate but rather just have 42 from an A7RII, Do you think that's not enough?
Pentax is not a sports camera, so why would you? The big advantage Canon and Nikon have over the Mirrorless camera's is focus tracking for sports shooter. Pentax would offer no advantage, so that said, An A7 is far more attractive. Any lens is available to you with a Mirrorless camera. These high res sensors are more than is needed for landscape rather than needing pixel shift especially at real world print sizes and outputs, I would rather have the lens choices than Pixel Shift. Sorry, this camera is about brand sentimentality rather than making any sense for a new buyer. I am sure it will handle well, be well made, and feel good to use, but all too late I reckon, Would have been better making a proper mirrorless camera but considering the real tech in the A7RII, Ricoh Pentax would struggle to catch up. This camera will make a few Camera Clubbies happy but cannot see it grabbing a new generation of shooters which is really what Pentax need, to be relevant.
kryten61: Kickstarter = A way to sell unproven product to a sheep mentality.
Never in history have people lined up to be sold product with zero testing or proof of performance. Can you say LED Light Cube anyone? 1000's sold on kickstarter without even a rated light output! I think Kickstarter web pages remove peoples intelligence through some electronic means and remove their rationality.
Yes mate sheep mentality, personally I would rather touch, test, and read some proof of a products claims. Not into buying a light for example that says, hey I am amazing and I put out light, and I am the best and if you buy me now before I exist you will SAVE MONEY! lol
Way overpriced low output boxes with LED's inside that people bought without one real stat, Nowhere did they tell you how much output they put out in Flash mode. Ended up to be totally underpowered, but "Kickstarter" fever made people ignore common sense or questioning, to sign up an buy. Can someone tell me why when something is on Kickstarter, people forgo normal questioning of real stats?
Kickstarter = A way to sell unproven product to a sheep mentality.
JapanAntoine: Too bad Samsung are stopping their ILC camera business... the NX1 is indeed interesting, but it ends there...
Having managed Camera stores in the past, Salesmen, I have found will tend to be dismissive of products they are not familiar with, even to the point of putting a product down or "Why do you want to see that camera" This translated actually means. Please don't ask me about that camera as I am unsure of demonstrating it.Brand ambassadors in stores is the only way to break it down, get the guys in the store owning and using the gear. THEN the attitude changes. It a circle, I don't know it, I don't want to demo it, the sales are poor, lets not put it on display, so sales are NON existent. Then the store and sales guys will say, poor camera and poor sales. Samsung need to work to fix this, only they can break this down over time.
So I think your anger should be at Jessops? Ask them why they don't stock it?
So in reality, they could be just cutting back in an area that worked on UI, UX etc??? Sony closed one of their main lens factories 5 years ago. They still seem to make lenses and camera's?
Everlast66: I mostly agree with the awards, except maybe the NX1 for Innovation of the year.
Innovation means breaking with the past and coming up with totally new ways to do things, often with the risk to not fit into what people are used to or comfortable with. To push technology forward.
I believe the A7RII and even RX100IV are far more innovative than the NX1. the NX1 has a great new crop format sensor and powerful processor, but all in the good old DSLR form factor. Should I care if I use the NX1 or any of the excellent Canon/Nikon crop sensor DSLRs with the same form factor.
Actually right now I am having huge buyers remorse for owning the camera you accuse me of not owning, the A7RII. Two weeks in and the paint is coming off, must have rubbed up against my NX1!!! Argh, innovative new instant Old Patina paint finish, looks old after just a few uses. I wish Sony had not innovated on that one at my expense.
Good one, so if I add it into my profile that will validate my statement? Thanks for doubting my knowledge. Go and see the camera store review. He estimates the 4K FF output at about a real 2.5 K and I agree with him, Its soft and mushy. And I have verified it with my own A7RII. Thanks for the photography lesson although its not needed I can assure you. Lets be accurate, I wanted FF asthetics in 4K, That is not what is achieved. In Super 35 it res is closer to 4k. Having an output res that is 4K doesn't mean it is achieving this in actual resolution. The 5D was alway rated way below its quotes 1080P in actual resolving output. I am a fan of the Samsung, no doubt, I wanted to be fan of the Sony...But maybe not! One thing is being a fan of something cause it does what it promises, it another thing being a Fan because you invested in a "Team" and you start barracking.
I tell you what I wish Sony had innovated at with the A7RII, Try using something better than blackboard paint on your bodies!!!! One trip out with the A7RII trying really hard to keep it separate of my other gear in case I decide not to keep it, and get home and find the paint on the prism edge rubbed through to the metal. ARGH, This camera is a Alpha effort, from battery to OS to even paint. I had heard this about the new Sony's. A plastic lens hood will win in a fight with the new Sony. Really Unhappy! This from a Premium priced camera that sells for $4K in this country!!!!
JapanAntoine. Can you confirm that this was all of Samsung's whole camera development team? Maybe they have other development in Korea? What camera's was your friend working on? And if this is true, why are these people not talking about it? Have they signed NDA's? . It seems strange to close a whole area and have silence and just friends of friends quoting? I am not saying you are wrong, just would like some more information.
My Alpha 900 had FF sensor stabilising back in 2006 thanks to Minolta/Sony, So is this innovative nearly 10 years latter?
As I said, I have both camera's and the only thing 4K about the A7RII in FF is the number on the Dial. The output is much lower than 4K, It really is only 4K at super 35 and can you explain how this is better than the NX1? Even then the NX1 way out resolves it.
Largest EVF...Innovative? The viewfinder is good but it needs to be because the back screen is crap. You cannot shoot video in daylight on the back screen. It's broken!
Sounds more like a p*ssing competition, I keep hearing the word "Largest" :-)
Anyway, don't suppose it matters, the sony did not win the samsung did and the advantage that I have and that the guys at DPR have is they have extensively used both.
And i am asking you what is innovative about the camera's you have suggested? I own one of them and i don't see it? Is it innovative to have a screen you can't see in daylight to shoot video? or a one hour battery? I could go on.. What has sales got to do with it? Sales success was not a criteria? I assume they judged it on the merits of the camera? I reckon more people have bought their NX1's and kept them than A7RII people who have bought and sold as a percentage?