hippo84

For those to think that lenses will be big: there was a leak of Zeiss 35/2.8 manual. This lens is much more compact than APS-C 24/1.8...

Canon wasn't able to make pellicle mirror usable. Sony does it.

In menu You can choose AF speed, FAST for stills and ACCURATE for video. And don't forget, Sony has fast AF not only in video, but in LiveView too.

I have both A77 and A99. A99 in AF-D is faster and more accurate. Besides this A99 has AF-Range, which helps to reduce time needed for focusing.

Yes, it does, but Sony has 2 kit lens. 18-55 doesn't have silent motor. 16-50 SSM is a kit lens special for video.

Yes, it does, but Sony has 2 kit lens. 18-55 doesn't have silent motor. 16-50 SSM is a kit lens special for video. Comparing 40/2.8 and 18-55/3.5-5.6 would be not very fair, wouldn't it?

Did they broke that 70D? Didn't they just shoot video, so everyone could decide, which camera is better?

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Olympus/PEN-EPM1 - Olympus is not very honest in marking ISO. For example, ISO12800 set on EPM1 is only ISO7693. That's why we see...

1st and 2nd and 5th ))

Don't forget, it costs $399! Even SL1 body costs $649! For SL1 price You can get A3000 kit + Sigma 60/2.8 for the price of SL1 Body.

Don't forget, it costs $399! Even SL1 body costs $649! For SL1 body price You can get A3000 kit + Sigma 60/2.8.

limited lens selection? 16 lenses from Sony+Zeiss Touit+Sigma+compatibility with Canon/Nikon/m42 using adapters.... Crappy EOS-M has limited lens selection, Nikon 1 and Fuji X have limited lens...

Canon does the same with EOS-M ))

Smartphone generation will be happy )) DSLR dinosaurs will go mad before making the 1st shot ))

Juck - I'm not m4/3 shooter and I don't have any reasons to make Canon look worse than 4/3 or any other system. I have rich experience in shooting different cameras, that's why I say what I say ))

[URL=http://www.radikal.ru][IMG]http://s019.radikal.ru/i620/1306/60/772f5cf01eb6.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

http://s019.radikal.ru/i620/1306/60/772f5cf01eb6.jpg

Pana 12-35/2.8 vs 24-105/4: http://s019.radikal.ru/i620/1306/60/772f5cf01eb6.jpg

About "24-105/4 beats in in every possible way " - can You prove it, or You just want it to be so?

Pana 12-35/2.8 collects more light. Don't mix up quantity of light light with DoF.