hippo84

Geren W Mortensen Jr - only cameras of 1st generation of SLT (A33 and A55) don't have that setting.

"Zeiss getting thrown out by a Sigma with the new 35mm" - source? DXO results are opposite.

"Zeiss getting thrown out by a Sigma with the new 35mm" - source? DXO results are opposite.
About viewfinder - You have an opportunity to choose OVF or tilting EVF.

"Zeiss getting thrown out by a Sigma with the new 35mm" - source? DXO results are opposite.
About viewfinder - You have an opportunity to choose OVF or tilting EVF. Not cheap, but this camera...

Don't forget, that optical IS reduces max.aperture.

Zeiss is 1.4, not 1.8

the reason - Go buy Fuji X-Pro1+35/1.4 for almost the same price.

R Butleк - Sorry, I was reading and translating the article not very attentively.

R Butler - Sorry, I was reading and translating the article not very attentively.

http://optics.org/news/2/2/25

Chet Meyerson Mine too ))

Where to go? Nikon still doesn't show us D400 successor. Pentax? Sony?

photo nuts RX100 in the 1st page of most sold P&S cameras in Amazon. Canon G1X (and other competitors) is nowhere near ))

With no IBIS all Canon and Nikon DSLR-s with lenses without stabilisation are good only for daylight )))))))

You haven't seen any picture taken with this lens. How can You tell about improvements? Sony lens is much more compact and doesn't look like plastic toy as opposed to Sigma.

wakaba - Why not to compare NEX with Nikon 1? ))

Is it so necessary to have large aperture on wide-angle lens? Taking into account, that it will be bigger and cost more...

16/2.8 is much cheeper. Hope higher cost means higher quality ))

Nice looking pancake. Well done Sony )

SETI: Я тоже не увидел в пресс-релизе ни слова про сменные объективы. Более того, наличие возможности менять объектив означало бы, что Полароид решил присоединиться к какой-то из существующих...