Although controversial at least these photographs provoke strong feelings & thoughtful discussions. I agree with the poster below, from my professional work alcohol &/or drugs (esp speed and ice) play a big role in DV. They are great "enablers". I hope this spot light on DV helps raise awareness of DV issues - its the kids I really worry about.
Great news on the Fuji x trans sensor support
Canon, the ball is now in your court
Great article could you please review other raw converters and photographic software in a similar way
Ray Sachs: I either own or have owned four of the listed cameras and shot a fair amount with a couple of others. I've been a mirrorless user for a couple of years (including m43 but not limited to it) and this is the first m43 camera that I'd have voted for as camera of the year. It's the first one that convinced large numbers of DSLR users to convert to mirrorless, including a few of my friends who wouldn't have considered it before. It's not as absolutely top-end capable as the highest end DSLRs, but considering all of the trade offs, the innovations in this camera, and how close it finally comes to the best available image quality, I think it's a good choice and represents something of a tipping point for mirrorless in general.
I agree I think we will look back on the OMD as the tipping point in mirrorless acceptance. I think we will be in for exciting times in the next few years as mirrorless improves further and starts replacing pro DSLRs. The first full frame mirrorless that is affordable and has good autofocus will be a game changer like the OMD has been this year.
where is the Fuji xpro 1 support apple? some one is asleep at the wheel
I've not been able to use this camera yet but the images people are producing are stunning. This grip looks like it addresses the concerns people have about holding this camera.
Any improvement in Fuji x-pro 1 support?
Any news on RAW Fuji x-pro 1 support?
any news on fuji xpro 1 support for RAW files? the website still has it as not supported but I am not sure which version of the software this is referring to.
This looks like a fantastic camera. I can't wait to try one. To all the trolls below it is FULL FRAME! There is nothing like this on the market at this cheap price point
any new medium format or 35mm film cameras?
nicolaiecostel: I know I will sound like a bit of an ignorant, but how is Leica still going ? I know that for a company to survive, it must have big sale values, albeit at high prices. I mean, Pentax sells loads more than Leica but it still went bust a few times. Who buys these overpriced allmost-one-offs, in such large quantities so that a company cand afford to pay the personell, invest in R&D and so on ?
Less is more!
D1N0: specs look a little better than the d600 to me 1/8000 more bracketing and wifi and gps.
The canon website says it is only 1/4000 of a second :( max shutter speed.
DStudio: It will be interesting to see how well this price tag works - this was about the max I figured they'd go. After seeing Sony's price for the A99, and thinking about the realities of the value of the dollar to the yen, I realized there was no way they'd be down near the $1500 price some had hoped for. The higher prices in US$ we're seeing for many cameras and lenses are not merely fickle decisions by Japanese camera makers - unfortunately, they reflect the realities of a devalued dollar and an economy that's worse than many Americans want to admit.
But back to the photographic side, it's great to see Nikon make full frame now accessible to a larger audience - it will be interesting to see how the competition prices similar products during the next year.
Imagine what the price would have been in $US at the exchange rate of 5 years ago. The only upside is maybe Nikon will open a factory in the US. Low dollar, large recovering(ish?) economy, should help get prices down for the US market at least.
looks like a great camera. I can't wait to try it out
slncezgsi: I have just read the short review of DP2 Merril from Steve Huff - really pity that the performance (apart from IQ) so bad is. The IQ is really amazing (just keep it under ISO 800). But yes - even for the IQ itself the camera is tempting.
I have a feeling sigma lacks the resources to fully exploit the foveon sensor technology. That is they don't have the cash to design the other technology to make the dp series better all round cameras
mosc: Is anybody else struck by the similarities in light gathering between the RX-100's f4.9 equivalent and the DP1m's f4.2 at 28mm? Except one is physically much smaller, zooms, costs less, etc. I doubt the sensor is better in the Sigma at ISO 1600+ either. Doubt we'll see a multi-shot-and-merged low light mode. In low light, it's out done by a cheaper ZOOM!
Sigmas dp series cameras are specialised cameras which are not designed to be good all round cameras. Clearly an Sony RX100 is a much better all round camera. The sigma is best bought as an extra camera to use along side your other kit and shoot with it in the right conditions
topstuff: 40mm is a lovely length on FF.
Pop that puppy on a 5D series camera ( classic, 2 or 3) and you would have a relatively compact camera with amazing IQ.
Nice to see Canon copying Pentax !!
Cool another film eos user I can't wait to use it on my Élan 7NE and my eos IX APS film SLR!