Matt1645f4

Matt1645f4

Lives in United Kingdom Guildford, United Kingdom
Joined on Mar 28, 2011

Comments

Total: 146, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I had this back in august was playing with settings and found dng caputure it works an does improve images but only slightly.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2014 at 18:12 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

iudex: Oh I have just noticed this: max format is 35mm FF. Is it just a typo, or is it really a FF zoom?

Probably a typo :( but fingers crossed till confirmed

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2014 at 22:27 UTC

The only 2 things that would deter me is it's not f4 and the price image quality needs to be brilliant to justify it.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2014 at 22:25 UTC as 48th comment
On Pentax launches K-S1 Sweets Collection article (231 comments in total)

May be Pentax needs to get some crowdfunding (just as Panono did) to get their "Full-Frame camera" into production? Go one Pentax try it and see how much you could raise and at the same time see how many of us Pentaxians want FF.

Just please don't go OTT with the colours, what you've done with the K3 in enough Black, Silver and Titanium is all thats needed ..............

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 09:57 UTC as 50th comment | 2 replies
On Pentax launches K-S1 Sweets Collection article (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jokica: Pentax, give us FF, please! I will pick one in pink, I swear.

I'll grudgingly buy one in Black if thats all you offer......

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 09:50 UTC
On Pentax launches K-S1 Sweets Collection article (231 comments in total)

I dread to think what will happen with a full frame Pentax camera. Makes me seriously consider swapping to Nikon or Sony

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 07:49 UTC as 55th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

Canon are becoming like the boy who cried wolfe.................

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 11:57 UTC as 495th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

I awoke from my hibernation for this? Wake me when Pentax launch their Full-frame cameria..........

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 11:55 UTC as 498th comment | 1 reply
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

Having searched other sites and looked at the website it comes from my money is on a new Canon user only Flickr style image sharing site.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 14:15 UTC as 734th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)
In reply to:

DPhotoWriter: Canon buys Samsung and releases the Canon Galaxy S6 starting tomorrow! The S6 features 10-step optical stabilization, 100x optical zoom lens with flat lens design, APS-C sensor, folding display, 16-core processor, 1mm thickness -- all that goodies for $10.

Bet it only comes in white.................

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 09:55 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

Other sites seen to think thers a full frame 45-50 megapixel camera on its way. but after the last time they issued a similar message we ended up with a photo competition...............

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 08:06 UTC as 875th comment
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: Real-world samples (beta) article (268 comments in total)

Are the 23 i had it all DPR staff?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 17:52 UTC as 104th comment
On Photokina 2014: Ricoh stand report article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: Whatever happened to the MX-1? Is it still in production?

I always for the MX would of made a great name for a Mirrolass APSC camera which could use the lovely limited range of primes as well as the rest of the Pentax range. hmmmm just image a retro styled MX with digi view finder built into the hump.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 12:45 UTC
On Photokina 2014: Ricoh stand report article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: Whatever happened to the MX-1? Is it still in production?

Thought it was discontinued a few months back, was announced very quietly.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 19:34 UTC
On Sigma announces dp1 Quattro article (200 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: As much as I like Sigma, they need to drop this Quattro-design fiasco A-S-A-P before they surpass the SD1 original release-price fiasco. WHAT ON EARTH did the designers think when creating the Quattro??? IT IS ugly, IT IS grossly not ergonomic, IT IS not compact in any conceivable way!!! There is nothing positive to this design at all. Sigma wake up...

It's worst than the Pentax K0-1 design disaster by Marc Newson. My wife is Left Handed and she cannot get on with this camera atleast with a more traditional design it is more user friendly.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 14, 2014 at 12:40 UTC
In reply to:

Matt1645f4: If its the Monkeys image, what's to stop others using images taken by the Mars rover for example the hardware is NASA's but the image is captured by the Rover (yes the rover can be made to take a photo remotely but it sends back many of its own). The same can be said for each operator that directs the rover to photo various objects. is it theirs?

It's a theoretical point

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2014 at 09:42 UTC
In reply to:

Michael J Davis: I agree entirely with chillgreg!
I think of the number of creative photos I've taken 'by accident' - does that mean that I'm to be deprived of the copyright of those?

And what about that silly 'camera toss' craze a few years back - they were intended to be taken, but not under the control of the equipment owner.

This is a very dangerous precedent.

I'm not dis agreeing with you at all. It just an observation of the comments others are making that who ever took the photo owns it. It's clearly the Photographers image the process and set up he put in place to achieve this is his and not the monkeys.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 21:40 UTC
In reply to:

Matt1645f4: If he went out there with the intention of allowing the Monkey to use his equipment and see what the results would be would he still be the copyright owner?

I would of thought yes. As it would of been his creative intention that lead to the images capture. And i can't see much difference in this argument that would deny him his copyright.

This does question the right of copyright. If i was to go and make a Photograph of another photo would this entitle me to the copyright, as i would of created a new and unique image?

I don't disagree, my point is about the creative process and does the point of creation determines ownership or the creative set up and development not contribute at all.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 21:33 UTC
In reply to:

KrisAK: Headline from The Telegraph (UK news):

"Wikimedia votes to decide who owns monkey selfie."

Cast your vote today. Humans only.

Having read the article it seems to me that the the person who uploaded it a second time is using the differences of international copyright Law to validate his upload. However having already removed the photo once, hasn't Wikimedia set a precedent?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 14:53 UTC

If its the Monkeys image, what's to stop others using images taken by the Mars rover for example the hardware is NASA's but the image is captured by the Rover (yes the rover can be made to take a photo remotely but it sends back many of its own). The same can be said for each operator that directs the rover to photo various objects. is it theirs?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 14:36 UTC as 318th comment | 3 replies
Total: 146, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »